21:4821:48, 28 April 2016diffhist+104
Fascism
I did read the revision summary and there's already a talk going on. I left a message and had no response.
20:3420:34, 28 April 2016diffhist+104
Fascism
I'll tell you only another time, D'Annunzio and his men did not "aggress Slavs" (Fascists, ops, I mean, the Fascist regime did, LATER). They took an Italian-populated land and did not hurt anyone but the International Force, as you can verify yourself.
20:1920:19, 28 April 2016diffhist+148
National Fascist Party
Yeah, I know - claiming Italian-populated lands should be part of Italy was clearly ABSURD on their part! Why do you mix up Imperialism and Irredentism? Why depicting such an objective as imperialistic aims towards the poor Slavs?
20:0920:09, 28 April 2016diffhist+104
Fascism
Omitting facts is an odious sin; deliberately lying is even worse. D'Annunzio and his men did not "aggress" any fucking South Slavs. They took Italian Fiume and that was it, ON THEIR PART. What happened later doesn't fit here.
21:4821:48, 28 April 2016diffhist+104
Fascism
I did read the revision summary and there's already a talk going on. I left a message and had no response.
20:3420:34, 28 April 2016diffhist+104
Fascism
I'll tell you only another time, D'Annunzio and his men did not "aggress Slavs" (Fascists, ops, I mean, the Fascist regime did, LATER). They took an Italian-populated land and did not hurt anyone but the International Force, as you can verify yourself.
20:1920:19, 28 April 2016diffhist+148
National Fascist Party
Yeah, I know - claiming Italian-populated lands should be part of Italy was clearly ABSURD on their part! Why do you mix up Imperialism and Irredentism? Why depicting such an objective as imperialistic aims towards the poor Slavs?
20:0920:09, 28 April 2016diffhist+104
Fascism
Omitting facts is an odious sin; deliberately lying is even worse. D'Annunzio and his men did not "aggress" any fucking South Slavs. They took Italian Fiume and that was it, ON THEIR PART. What happened later doesn't fit here.