For 190.44.158.38
talk
block log
logs
filter log
21 November 2012
- 23:27 23:27, 21 November 2012 diff hist −21 Wonga.com what a dumb place to put a reference, in the middle of a two word phrase. awful, awful style
20 November 2012
- 13:05 13:05, 20 November 2012 diff hist −375 Frankie Dettori →Career: rm advertising
19 November 2012
- 01:44 01:44, 19 November 2012 diff hist +28 Second Intifada →First days of the Intifada: poor writing. why conceal the name of the boy? why use brackets unnecessarily?
- 01:40 01:40, 19 November 2012 diff hist 0 Second Intifada references after facts, not before. It doesn't get any less obvious.
- 01:34 01:34, 19 November 2012 diff hist −22 San Alfonso del Mar →Development: rm pov
17 November 2012
- 17:53 17:53, 17 November 2012 diff hist +8 The Burghers of Calais →Examples
15 November 2012
- 22:37 22:37, 15 November 2012 diff hist +16 Glenn Mulcaire →Footballer: rather than link to an article using an apparently unrelated name, simply give all the necessary facts.
- 22:34 22:34, 15 November 2012 diff hist −1,047 Glenn Mulcaire →Footballer: rm pov, regurgitation of other people's pov, and move references to after the fact instead of before which is obviously a dumb place to put them.
14 November 2012
- 23:38 23:38, 14 November 2012 diff hist −45 AFC Wimbledon rm pov. seriously, if people can't even understand this basic policy, why are they editing?
- 02:46 02:46, 14 November 2012 diff hist −210 Moon (2009 film) →Production: irrelevant
12 November 2012
- 02:47 02:47, 12 November 2012 diff hist −14 Bellinzona →Name and coat of arms: it is one, not both. why put a right thing and a wrong thing, and not just the right thing?
29 October 2012
- 04:34 04:34, 29 October 2012 diff hist −90 2012 Indian Grand Prix in what circumstances do you suppose anyone uses this supposed "formal" name? You have it in the infobox and you should not be forcing advertising into the article. The F1 wikiproject agreed that the full official event name should go in the infobox only
- 04:31 04:31, 29 October 2012 diff hist −63 2011 Indian Grand Prix "rv - because that's what the Project agreed to do", you said, but the project did not agree to this. The project agreed on exactly the opposite. Why make stuff up?
- 04:27 04:27, 29 October 2012 diff hist −52 Imogen Heap →Musical and songwriting style: "singer songwriter" is not a genre, don't put important parts of the sentence in brackets, and rm pov.
- 04:26 04:26, 29 October 2012 diff hist +418 User talk:190.44.158.38 →F1 race leads
27 October 2012
- 17:15 17:15, 27 October 2012 diff hist −63 2011 Indian Grand Prix In fact, an extensive search of the F1 project talk archives reveals that the only relevant discussion ended with someone saying that the full name should only go in the infobox and not in the lead paragraph.
- 17:06 17:06, 27 October 2012 diff hist −36 Bracket →List of types: these terms specifically refer to the left or the right of any type of bracket, and not to this particular type generally.
- 17:04 17:04, 27 October 2012 diff hist −15 Overselling →Solutions: this section is stating the absurdly obvious anyway but it could at least make actual sense.
- 16:59 16:59, 27 October 2012 diff hist −186 Bracket →List of types: bold face is used in particular circumstances only. See MOS.
- 16:46 16:46, 27 October 2012 diff hist −5 Bracket →Parentheses ( ){{Anchor|Parentheses|Parenthesis}}: rm pov
- 16:30 16:30, 27 October 2012 diff hist −312 Overselling →Internet connectivity: a 15 year old source is not appropriate here. Also, rm misused brackets.
- 11:01 11:01, 27 October 2012 diff hist −639 Frequentist probability →Application: in any case, on further reflection, this section does nothing except put up a straw man and then knock it down. Nothing of substance is said. Tag: section blanking
- 10:59 10:59, 27 October 2012 diff hist 0 Frequentist probability →Application: References AFTER facts, NOT before. This is OBVIOUS.
- 10:58 10:58, 27 October 2012 diff hist −31 Frequentist probability →Etymology: putting references before the facts being cited is dumb, and the meaning of the reference to Harold Jeffrys is not clear.
26 October 2012
- 03:51 03:51, 26 October 2012 diff hist 0 Carol Barnes →Later life and death: do not link text to an article about something different.
- 03:50 03:50, 26 October 2012 diff hist +13 Carol Barnes →Personal life: horrific ambiguities. Dennis MacShane did not die in a skydiving accident, and James Barnes was not a magistrate.
- 03:22 03:22, 26 October 2012 diff hist −20 Bill Hicks →Cancer diagnosis and death: cite the source, don't regurgitate it.
25 October 2012
- 16:14 16:14, 25 October 2012 diff hist −6 Dan Wheldon Not needed. See MOS.
- 16:12 16:12, 25 October 2012 diff hist −44 2011 Indian Grand Prix Starting an article off with two names for the same thing is dumb. If you people seriously believe that there is a "formal name" for grands prix, which I suppose you imagine the posh people use when they talk about the races, then why not use only that?
- 09:43 09:43, 25 October 2012 diff hist −1 Marble Boat why interrupt sentences unnecessarily? It annoys the reader.
- 06:03 06:03, 25 October 2012 diff hist −11 Betting in poker this indentation of certain paragraphs is just confusing and unnecessary.
- 05:59 05:59, 25 October 2012 diff hist −2 Betting in poker →Acting out of turn: why would that be indented? No need for it - corrected.
- 01:37 01:37, 25 October 2012 diff hist −124 Andy Kaufman →Illness and death: removed sentence which makes absolutely no sense at all.
24 October 2012
- 16:19 16:19, 24 October 2012 diff hist −300 John Williams this is already made clear in the article. promoting a particular source's pov about the article subject doesn't add anything.
- 04:27 04:27, 24 October 2012 diff hist −8 Ian Shelton Look, this is really basic. Simply say what he has done, don't impose a judgement like this. Seems that fewer and fewer people understand what NPOV means.
- 04:21 04:21, 24 October 2012 diff hist −183 Philip Chevron →Career: rm pov
- 04:19 04:19, 24 October 2012 diff hist −123 The Pogues →Band history: the bits in brackets were 1. meaningless, and 2. not relevant. removed.
23 October 2012
- 21:47 21:47, 23 October 2012 diff hist −5 Ceefax unnecessary
- 21:30 21:30, 23 October 2012 diff hist −22 Tone mapping "essentially" is unnecessary verbosity that adds nothing. the brackets here were also unnecessary and only served to obscure the meaning of the sentence.
- 21:26 21:26, 23 October 2012 diff hist −7 Tone mapping rm pov
- 16:40 16:40, 23 October 2012 diff hist 0 Ceefax →Modern day: Don't put references before the fact. It makes no sense. Put them after.
- 04:08 04:08, 23 October 2012 diff hist −37 Quisling →Etymology: rm pov
- 03:38 03:38, 23 October 2012 diff hist −167 User:Valoem/Poker probability (Texas hold 'em) rm pov, poor tone and excessive jargon
- 03:33 03:33, 23 October 2012 diff hist −69 John Bercow →Rumours of defection: again, put the bloody citation after the bloody fact. how is that not obvious? and report what the source says, don't endorse it.
- 03:31 03:31, 23 October 2012 diff hist 0 John Bercow →Rumours of defection: never yet seen anyone even attempt to explain why you would ever put a citation in the middle of the fact like this, instead of afterwards as is plainly obviously the correct place to put it.
- 03:30 03:30, 23 October 2012 diff hist −2,083 User:Valoem/Poker probability (Texas hold 'em) →Interesting cases to memorize: if the author wants to reserve any rights, the material must be removed. Tag: section blanking
- 03:29 03:29, 23 October 2012 diff hist −3 Brazilian real rm jargon
- 03:28 03:28, 23 October 2012 diff hist −36 Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva →Economy: rm nonsense jargon. we are not collaterly sisters here.
- 03:24 03:24, 23 October 2012 diff hist +565 User talk:190.44.158.38 →Uncivil edit summaries
13 October 2012
- 01:24 01:24, 13 October 2012 diff hist −4 Bill Maher →Health care: why actually put in the effort to make the article harder to read?
 | This is the
contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
For 190.44.158.38
talk
block log
logs
filter log
21 November 2012
- 23:27 23:27, 21 November 2012 diff hist −21 Wonga.com what a dumb place to put a reference, in the middle of a two word phrase. awful, awful style
20 November 2012
- 13:05 13:05, 20 November 2012 diff hist −375 Frankie Dettori →Career: rm advertising
19 November 2012
- 01:44 01:44, 19 November 2012 diff hist +28 Second Intifada →First days of the Intifada: poor writing. why conceal the name of the boy? why use brackets unnecessarily?
- 01:40 01:40, 19 November 2012 diff hist 0 Second Intifada references after facts, not before. It doesn't get any less obvious.
- 01:34 01:34, 19 November 2012 diff hist −22 San Alfonso del Mar →Development: rm pov
17 November 2012
- 17:53 17:53, 17 November 2012 diff hist +8 The Burghers of Calais →Examples
15 November 2012
- 22:37 22:37, 15 November 2012 diff hist +16 Glenn Mulcaire →Footballer: rather than link to an article using an apparently unrelated name, simply give all the necessary facts.
- 22:34 22:34, 15 November 2012 diff hist −1,047 Glenn Mulcaire →Footballer: rm pov, regurgitation of other people's pov, and move references to after the fact instead of before which is obviously a dumb place to put them.
14 November 2012
- 23:38 23:38, 14 November 2012 diff hist −45 AFC Wimbledon rm pov. seriously, if people can't even understand this basic policy, why are they editing?
- 02:46 02:46, 14 November 2012 diff hist −210 Moon (2009 film) →Production: irrelevant
12 November 2012
- 02:47 02:47, 12 November 2012 diff hist −14 Bellinzona →Name and coat of arms: it is one, not both. why put a right thing and a wrong thing, and not just the right thing?
29 October 2012
- 04:34 04:34, 29 October 2012 diff hist −90 2012 Indian Grand Prix in what circumstances do you suppose anyone uses this supposed "formal" name? You have it in the infobox and you should not be forcing advertising into the article. The F1 wikiproject agreed that the full official event name should go in the infobox only
- 04:31 04:31, 29 October 2012 diff hist −63 2011 Indian Grand Prix "rv - because that's what the Project agreed to do", you said, but the project did not agree to this. The project agreed on exactly the opposite. Why make stuff up?
- 04:27 04:27, 29 October 2012 diff hist −52 Imogen Heap →Musical and songwriting style: "singer songwriter" is not a genre, don't put important parts of the sentence in brackets, and rm pov.
- 04:26 04:26, 29 October 2012 diff hist +418 User talk:190.44.158.38 →F1 race leads
27 October 2012
- 17:15 17:15, 27 October 2012 diff hist −63 2011 Indian Grand Prix In fact, an extensive search of the F1 project talk archives reveals that the only relevant discussion ended with someone saying that the full name should only go in the infobox and not in the lead paragraph.
- 17:06 17:06, 27 October 2012 diff hist −36 Bracket →List of types: these terms specifically refer to the left or the right of any type of bracket, and not to this particular type generally.
- 17:04 17:04, 27 October 2012 diff hist −15 Overselling →Solutions: this section is stating the absurdly obvious anyway but it could at least make actual sense.
- 16:59 16:59, 27 October 2012 diff hist −186 Bracket →List of types: bold face is used in particular circumstances only. See MOS.
- 16:46 16:46, 27 October 2012 diff hist −5 Bracket →Parentheses ( ){{Anchor|Parentheses|Parenthesis}}: rm pov
- 16:30 16:30, 27 October 2012 diff hist −312 Overselling →Internet connectivity: a 15 year old source is not appropriate here. Also, rm misused brackets.
- 11:01 11:01, 27 October 2012 diff hist −639 Frequentist probability →Application: in any case, on further reflection, this section does nothing except put up a straw man and then knock it down. Nothing of substance is said. Tag: section blanking
- 10:59 10:59, 27 October 2012 diff hist 0 Frequentist probability →Application: References AFTER facts, NOT before. This is OBVIOUS.
- 10:58 10:58, 27 October 2012 diff hist −31 Frequentist probability →Etymology: putting references before the facts being cited is dumb, and the meaning of the reference to Harold Jeffrys is not clear.
26 October 2012
- 03:51 03:51, 26 October 2012 diff hist 0 Carol Barnes →Later life and death: do not link text to an article about something different.
- 03:50 03:50, 26 October 2012 diff hist +13 Carol Barnes →Personal life: horrific ambiguities. Dennis MacShane did not die in a skydiving accident, and James Barnes was not a magistrate.
- 03:22 03:22, 26 October 2012 diff hist −20 Bill Hicks →Cancer diagnosis and death: cite the source, don't regurgitate it.
25 October 2012
- 16:14 16:14, 25 October 2012 diff hist −6 Dan Wheldon Not needed. See MOS.
- 16:12 16:12, 25 October 2012 diff hist −44 2011 Indian Grand Prix Starting an article off with two names for the same thing is dumb. If you people seriously believe that there is a "formal name" for grands prix, which I suppose you imagine the posh people use when they talk about the races, then why not use only that?
- 09:43 09:43, 25 October 2012 diff hist −1 Marble Boat why interrupt sentences unnecessarily? It annoys the reader.
- 06:03 06:03, 25 October 2012 diff hist −11 Betting in poker this indentation of certain paragraphs is just confusing and unnecessary.
- 05:59 05:59, 25 October 2012 diff hist −2 Betting in poker →Acting out of turn: why would that be indented? No need for it - corrected.
- 01:37 01:37, 25 October 2012 diff hist −124 Andy Kaufman →Illness and death: removed sentence which makes absolutely no sense at all.
24 October 2012
- 16:19 16:19, 24 October 2012 diff hist −300 John Williams this is already made clear in the article. promoting a particular source's pov about the article subject doesn't add anything.
- 04:27 04:27, 24 October 2012 diff hist −8 Ian Shelton Look, this is really basic. Simply say what he has done, don't impose a judgement like this. Seems that fewer and fewer people understand what NPOV means.
- 04:21 04:21, 24 October 2012 diff hist −183 Philip Chevron →Career: rm pov
- 04:19 04:19, 24 October 2012 diff hist −123 The Pogues →Band history: the bits in brackets were 1. meaningless, and 2. not relevant. removed.
23 October 2012
- 21:47 21:47, 23 October 2012 diff hist −5 Ceefax unnecessary
- 21:30 21:30, 23 October 2012 diff hist −22 Tone mapping "essentially" is unnecessary verbosity that adds nothing. the brackets here were also unnecessary and only served to obscure the meaning of the sentence.
- 21:26 21:26, 23 October 2012 diff hist −7 Tone mapping rm pov
- 16:40 16:40, 23 October 2012 diff hist 0 Ceefax →Modern day: Don't put references before the fact. It makes no sense. Put them after.
- 04:08 04:08, 23 October 2012 diff hist −37 Quisling →Etymology: rm pov
- 03:38 03:38, 23 October 2012 diff hist −167 User:Valoem/Poker probability (Texas hold 'em) rm pov, poor tone and excessive jargon
- 03:33 03:33, 23 October 2012 diff hist −69 John Bercow →Rumours of defection: again, put the bloody citation after the bloody fact. how is that not obvious? and report what the source says, don't endorse it.
- 03:31 03:31, 23 October 2012 diff hist 0 John Bercow →Rumours of defection: never yet seen anyone even attempt to explain why you would ever put a citation in the middle of the fact like this, instead of afterwards as is plainly obviously the correct place to put it.
- 03:30 03:30, 23 October 2012 diff hist −2,083 User:Valoem/Poker probability (Texas hold 'em) →Interesting cases to memorize: if the author wants to reserve any rights, the material must be removed. Tag: section blanking
- 03:29 03:29, 23 October 2012 diff hist −3 Brazilian real rm jargon
- 03:28 03:28, 23 October 2012 diff hist −36 Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva →Economy: rm nonsense jargon. we are not collaterly sisters here.
- 03:24 03:24, 23 October 2012 diff hist +565 User talk:190.44.158.38 →Uncivil edit summaries
13 October 2012
- 01:24 01:24, 13 October 2012 diff hist −4 Bill Maher →Health care: why actually put in the effort to make the article harder to read?
|
| This is the
contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |