22:4222:42, 26 July 2015diffhist−7,909
Corruption in Navarre
I explained the reason for the changes from the very first moment. The entire article is utterly biased. How can a problem with a catering company be regarded as "corruption"?
22:3922:39, 26 July 2015diffhist−96
Íñigo Arista
The reference is invalid, because is not easily verifiable and is contested by the majority of Navarrese historians.
22:2322:23, 26 July 2015diffhist−7,909
Corruption in Navarre
Please, don´t vandalizing. Use the Talk for giving the reference that states that around the world a problem with a catering company can be labelled "corruption".
22:2022:20, 26 July 2015diffhist−251
Kingdom of Navarre
I gave a verifiable references that states that the filiation of Arista is utterly unknown; references must be verifiable.
20:0920:09, 25 July 2015diffhist−96
Íñigo Arista
The reference is invalid, because is not easily verifiable and is contested by the majority of Navarrese historians.
20:0220:02, 25 July 2015diffhist−251
Kingdom of Navarre
I insist: the references are invalid, because there are'nt easily verifiable. I've used the talk to give a reliable and veriable source of information.
22:4222:42, 26 July 2015diffhist−7,909
Corruption in Navarre
I explained the reason for the changes from the very first moment. The entire article is utterly biased. How can a problem with a catering company be regarded as "corruption"?
22:3922:39, 26 July 2015diffhist−96
Íñigo Arista
The reference is invalid, because is not easily verifiable and is contested by the majority of Navarrese historians.
22:2322:23, 26 July 2015diffhist−7,909
Corruption in Navarre
Please, don´t vandalizing. Use the Talk for giving the reference that states that around the world a problem with a catering company can be labelled "corruption".
22:2022:20, 26 July 2015diffhist−251
Kingdom of Navarre
I gave a verifiable references that states that the filiation of Arista is utterly unknown; references must be verifiable.
20:0920:09, 25 July 2015diffhist−96
Íñigo Arista
The reference is invalid, because is not easily verifiable and is contested by the majority of Navarrese historians.
20:0220:02, 25 July 2015diffhist−251
Kingdom of Navarre
I insist: the references are invalid, because there are'nt easily verifiable. I've used the talk to give a reliable and veriable source of information.