03:4503:45, 21 October 2022diffhist−39
Turanism
makes no scientific claims, and no citations, couldnt be pseudo science, just about basic cultural sinilaritiesTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
13:2913:29, 16 October 2022diffhist+3,025
Bolshevism
sorry, dont cast aspersions so quickly. i have already added references with citations from academic sources and ill use much kinder and polite wording about stalin and stalinism (for which what i said there is plenty of sources to be taken from on wikipedia about stalin cited).Tag: Reverted
15:1715:17, 15 October 2022diffhist+112
The Other Russia of E. V. Limonov
this other article is basically the same thing under a new name, but this article practically looks like a stub yet should be much more important now. it could be greatly expanded this way.Tag: Reverted
14:3214:32, 15 October 2022diffhist+1,901
Bolshevism
provide citations against my citations in the definition section. write in the section of definition instead of removing entire sections. im sorry but i did provide sources and i agree with your assessment. you are committing probable vandalism by removing all my sourced material proving stalinism and bolshevism are not the same (our academic consensus).Tags: UndoReverted
14:0814:08, 14 October 2022diffhist+1,007
Bolshevism
hey yeah, sorry for your misunderstanding, but im in complete agreement with the academic consensus based on the sources in the article. you need to get sources or go to talk page to prove that stalin wasnt bolshevik or didnt invent marxism or that bolshevism doesnt have stalinist features.eninismTags: UndoReverted
16:5716:57, 13 October 2022diffhist+1,007
Bolshevism
lots of new thoughts for content to work on as a basis for expanding this young small article yet of extremely high political importance in history and philosophy.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
03:4503:45, 21 October 2022diffhist−39
Turanism
makes no scientific claims, and no citations, couldnt be pseudo science, just about basic cultural sinilaritiesTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
13:2913:29, 16 October 2022diffhist+3,025
Bolshevism
sorry, dont cast aspersions so quickly. i have already added references with citations from academic sources and ill use much kinder and polite wording about stalin and stalinism (for which what i said there is plenty of sources to be taken from on wikipedia about stalin cited).Tag: Reverted
15:1715:17, 15 October 2022diffhist+112
The Other Russia of E. V. Limonov
this other article is basically the same thing under a new name, but this article practically looks like a stub yet should be much more important now. it could be greatly expanded this way.Tag: Reverted
14:3214:32, 15 October 2022diffhist+1,901
Bolshevism
provide citations against my citations in the definition section. write in the section of definition instead of removing entire sections. im sorry but i did provide sources and i agree with your assessment. you are committing probable vandalism by removing all my sourced material proving stalinism and bolshevism are not the same (our academic consensus).Tags: UndoReverted
14:0814:08, 14 October 2022diffhist+1,007
Bolshevism
hey yeah, sorry for your misunderstanding, but im in complete agreement with the academic consensus based on the sources in the article. you need to get sources or go to talk page to prove that stalin wasnt bolshevik or didnt invent marxism or that bolshevism doesnt have stalinist features.eninismTags: UndoReverted
16:5716:57, 13 October 2022diffhist+1,007
Bolshevism
lots of new thoughts for content to work on as a basis for expanding this young small article yet of extremely high political importance in history and philosophy.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit