03:2903:29, 27 June 2015diffhist+666
Environmental impact of wind power
→Birds: Sovacool acknowledges in the ref I supplied that his data wrt. nuclear caused bird deaths was faulty, he ascribed birds flying into cooling towers at a coal plant as something that happened at a nuclear one.. Therefore "0" was added.
03:1503:15, 27 June 2015diffhist+12
Environmental impact of wind power
→Birds: As Sovacool has since stressed that his study is a preliminary one, and he has acknowledges the large errors in the primary paper that supports all the figures in this table, it is only right to rename the table to include the word"preliminary
23:0523:05, 26 June 2015diffhist+349
Nuclear winter
These are climatology papers and as such do not model that agricultural losses would be a result. They merely suggest that would follow from cooling, and this, if you read the great section on Pinatuba, is not really a valid extrapolation. Clarified it so
22:3022:30, 26 June 2015diffhist0
Nuclear winter
as this is the webpage of 1 of the modellers & contains much non-peer reviewed information, I tagged it as, reliable source?
22:1622:16, 26 June 2015diffhist+95
Nuclear winter
How many firestorms are modeled to occur in this "US-Russia war"? Secondly, the reference is shoddy. We need peer-reviewed publications! Not the personal webpage of 1 of the modellers
03:2903:29, 27 June 2015diffhist+666
Environmental impact of wind power
→Birds: Sovacool acknowledges in the ref I supplied that his data wrt. nuclear caused bird deaths was faulty, he ascribed birds flying into cooling towers at a coal plant as something that happened at a nuclear one.. Therefore "0" was added.
03:1503:15, 27 June 2015diffhist+12
Environmental impact of wind power
→Birds: As Sovacool has since stressed that his study is a preliminary one, and he has acknowledges the large errors in the primary paper that supports all the figures in this table, it is only right to rename the table to include the word"preliminary
23:0523:05, 26 June 2015diffhist+349
Nuclear winter
These are climatology papers and as such do not model that agricultural losses would be a result. They merely suggest that would follow from cooling, and this, if you read the great section on Pinatuba, is not really a valid extrapolation. Clarified it so
22:3022:30, 26 June 2015diffhist0
Nuclear winter
as this is the webpage of 1 of the modellers & contains much non-peer reviewed information, I tagged it as, reliable source?
22:1622:16, 26 June 2015diffhist+95
Nuclear winter
How many firestorms are modeled to occur in this "US-Russia war"? Secondly, the reference is shoddy. We need peer-reviewed publications! Not the personal webpage of 1 of the modellers