18:0118:01, 23 August 2022diffhist+344
Psychiatry
Undid revision 1106214436 by
C.Fred (
talk) Huh? Looks like some anti-psychiatry trolls are trying to bury a consensus. Follow Wikipedia's rules or the page gets locked.Tags: UndoReverted
17:3917:39, 23 August 2022diffhist+344
Psychiatry
Huh? Looks like some anti-psychiatry trolls are trying to bury a consensus. Follow Wikipedia's rules or the page gets locked.Tag: Reverted
03:3403:34, 11 August 2022diffhist+344
Psychiatry
Undid revision 1103760157 by
Talpedia (
talk) Aw, that's a shame! "Editors who ignore talk page discussions yet continue to edit in or revert disputed material, or who stonewall discussions, may be guilty of disruptive editing and incur sanctions." Looks like you can revive the discussion rather than continue reverting in conflict with the consensus, achieved on the Talk page, doesn't it then? This is your first warning. Apologies, my guy!Tags: UndoReverted
10 August 2022
20:5820:58, 10 August 2022diffhist+344
Psychiatry
Undid revision 1103730565 by
Squeakachu (
talk) Ah oops, you're probably thinking about that several-hundred word section on the Talk page that you forgot to read for several months while you were responding to each of the other active discussions. Please restore it from the archives if you want to re-open the closed discussion and do not revert until you have a new consensus, haha! Thanks!Tags: UndoReverted
20:3820:38, 10 August 2022diffhist+344
Psychiatry
Undid revision 1103723420 by
Talpedia (
talk) Oh geez @Talpedia I'm so sorry buddy but in that case add a citation needed tag and revive the section on the talk page and see if you can create a new consensus. I've noticed you've been very active there so good work on all that you've been doing (other than offering your opinion over the course of several months, allowing a consensus to be achieved without you, I mean). You crazy, rich cat!Tags: UndoReverted
20:1020:10, 10 August 2022diffhist+344
Psychiatry
We've had consensus on this for several months now, so high time someone added it to the article, I suppose; particularly if we want to archive that section of the talk page.Tag: Reverted
18:0118:01, 23 August 2022diffhist+344
Psychiatry
Undid revision 1106214436 by
C.Fred (
talk) Huh? Looks like some anti-psychiatry trolls are trying to bury a consensus. Follow Wikipedia's rules or the page gets locked.Tags: UndoReverted
17:3917:39, 23 August 2022diffhist+344
Psychiatry
Huh? Looks like some anti-psychiatry trolls are trying to bury a consensus. Follow Wikipedia's rules or the page gets locked.Tag: Reverted
03:3403:34, 11 August 2022diffhist+344
Psychiatry
Undid revision 1103760157 by
Talpedia (
talk) Aw, that's a shame! "Editors who ignore talk page discussions yet continue to edit in or revert disputed material, or who stonewall discussions, may be guilty of disruptive editing and incur sanctions." Looks like you can revive the discussion rather than continue reverting in conflict with the consensus, achieved on the Talk page, doesn't it then? This is your first warning. Apologies, my guy!Tags: UndoReverted
10 August 2022
20:5820:58, 10 August 2022diffhist+344
Psychiatry
Undid revision 1103730565 by
Squeakachu (
talk) Ah oops, you're probably thinking about that several-hundred word section on the Talk page that you forgot to read for several months while you were responding to each of the other active discussions. Please restore it from the archives if you want to re-open the closed discussion and do not revert until you have a new consensus, haha! Thanks!Tags: UndoReverted
20:3820:38, 10 August 2022diffhist+344
Psychiatry
Undid revision 1103723420 by
Talpedia (
talk) Oh geez @Talpedia I'm so sorry buddy but in that case add a citation needed tag and revive the section on the talk page and see if you can create a new consensus. I've noticed you've been very active there so good work on all that you've been doing (other than offering your opinion over the course of several months, allowing a consensus to be achieved without you, I mean). You crazy, rich cat!Tags: UndoReverted
20:1020:10, 10 August 2022diffhist+344
Psychiatry
We've had consensus on this for several months now, so high time someone added it to the article, I suppose; particularly if we want to archive that section of the talk page.Tag: Reverted