00:5900:59, 3 June 2020diffhist−646
Ottoman Empire
The two given sources do not claim such a thing. Those two sources are also not authoritative or legitimate enough to comment on the nature of the Ottoman dynasty to begin with. One of them is Encyclopedia Iranica the other one is a survey on use of persian language in Ottoman Historiography. The survey does not say anything relating to such a general description as the Ottoman Dynasty being "Persianized". The other source is not considered authoritative with regards to Ottoman history. Pract...Tags: references removedMobile editMobile web edit
31 May 2020
18:0518:05, 31 May 2020diffhist−1,846
Mimar Sinan
→Early years and background: The given references neither make a definitive statement with evidence ("probably", or "said to have been" are the used qualifications) nor are sources who have done any sort of research on the question of Mimar Sinan's ethnicity. Thus they are speculative hearsay at best and do not constitute expert opinion in any shaoe or form on the question of Mimar Sinan's ethnicity.Tags: references removedMobile editMobile web edit
17:5917:59, 31 May 2020diffhist−366
Ottoman architecture
The statement is not supported by given reference. Seljuq architectural tradition (as mentioned in the reference) is not an example of Iranian architecture but rather of Turkic architecture.Tags: references removedMobile editMobile web edit
30 May 2020
02:4302:43, 30 May 2020diffhist−11
Halil Kut
→Armenian Genocide: deleted unsourced material (given reference does not include stated claim), cleaned up shoddy Turkish-English translation that had interchanged parts of the given quote in their translation.
28 May 2020
14:2314:23, 28 May 2020diffhist−1,751
Armenians in Turkey
Conspiratorial statements which are not backed by actuak documented evidence or empirical data. The few sources given are by political activists and nationalists. The reference dont include any empirical research.Tags: Revertedsection blankingMobile editMobile web edit
14:2114:21, 28 May 2020diffhist−1,731
Armenians in Turkey
Conspiratorial allegations based ona a single anectodal reference. Not a reliable or valid encyclopedic entry. The claims themselves are vague enough to be useless.Tags: Revertedsection blankingMobile editMobile web edit
15:1615:16, 26 May 2020diffhist−644
Rapid Support Forces
Biased and irrelevant sentence deleted. No other military unit page on wikipedia has such descriptions in its intro paragraph despite having similar histories.Tags: references removedMobile editMobile web edit
00:3000:30, 22 May 2020diffhist+193
Turkish History Thesis
Corrected unreferenced opinions and added important caveat to a statement that didn't have a reference by providing reference to support caveat.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
23:5723:57, 21 May 2020diffhist−353
Safavid Iran
Fixed factually incorrect statement. Dozens of other references contradict that statement and one of the two references is a history of drug use in Iran, a source that is patently unqualified to comment on the ethnic origins of the Safavid dynasty. The Safavid dynasty spoke Azeri according to the sources given in other place of this article and their most trusted soldiers were Qizilbash who were by and large Alevi Turkmens and Azeris. This information is verifiable in a multitude of sources.Tags: references removedMobile editMobile web edit
23:4623:46, 21 May 2020diffhist−236
Shaybanids
Single source given which is biased and overstates case. Other references dont corroborate assertion.Tags: references removedMobile editMobile web edit
15:5015:50, 19 May 2020diffhist−526
Khalifa Haftar
Sentences were not supported by the given references. In fact, the references directly contradicted the sentences.Tags: references removedMobile editMobile web edit
00:5900:59, 3 June 2020diffhist−646
Ottoman Empire
The two given sources do not claim such a thing. Those two sources are also not authoritative or legitimate enough to comment on the nature of the Ottoman dynasty to begin with. One of them is Encyclopedia Iranica the other one is a survey on use of persian language in Ottoman Historiography. The survey does not say anything relating to such a general description as the Ottoman Dynasty being "Persianized". The other source is not considered authoritative with regards to Ottoman history. Pract...Tags: references removedMobile editMobile web edit
31 May 2020
18:0518:05, 31 May 2020diffhist−1,846
Mimar Sinan
→Early years and background: The given references neither make a definitive statement with evidence ("probably", or "said to have been" are the used qualifications) nor are sources who have done any sort of research on the question of Mimar Sinan's ethnicity. Thus they are speculative hearsay at best and do not constitute expert opinion in any shaoe or form on the question of Mimar Sinan's ethnicity.Tags: references removedMobile editMobile web edit
17:5917:59, 31 May 2020diffhist−366
Ottoman architecture
The statement is not supported by given reference. Seljuq architectural tradition (as mentioned in the reference) is not an example of Iranian architecture but rather of Turkic architecture.Tags: references removedMobile editMobile web edit
30 May 2020
02:4302:43, 30 May 2020diffhist−11
Halil Kut
→Armenian Genocide: deleted unsourced material (given reference does not include stated claim), cleaned up shoddy Turkish-English translation that had interchanged parts of the given quote in their translation.
28 May 2020
14:2314:23, 28 May 2020diffhist−1,751
Armenians in Turkey
Conspiratorial statements which are not backed by actuak documented evidence or empirical data. The few sources given are by political activists and nationalists. The reference dont include any empirical research.Tags: Revertedsection blankingMobile editMobile web edit
14:2114:21, 28 May 2020diffhist−1,731
Armenians in Turkey
Conspiratorial allegations based ona a single anectodal reference. Not a reliable or valid encyclopedic entry. The claims themselves are vague enough to be useless.Tags: Revertedsection blankingMobile editMobile web edit
15:1615:16, 26 May 2020diffhist−644
Rapid Support Forces
Biased and irrelevant sentence deleted. No other military unit page on wikipedia has such descriptions in its intro paragraph despite having similar histories.Tags: references removedMobile editMobile web edit
00:3000:30, 22 May 2020diffhist+193
Turkish History Thesis
Corrected unreferenced opinions and added important caveat to a statement that didn't have a reference by providing reference to support caveat.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
23:5723:57, 21 May 2020diffhist−353
Safavid Iran
Fixed factually incorrect statement. Dozens of other references contradict that statement and one of the two references is a history of drug use in Iran, a source that is patently unqualified to comment on the ethnic origins of the Safavid dynasty. The Safavid dynasty spoke Azeri according to the sources given in other place of this article and their most trusted soldiers were Qizilbash who were by and large Alevi Turkmens and Azeris. This information is verifiable in a multitude of sources.Tags: references removedMobile editMobile web edit
23:4623:46, 21 May 2020diffhist−236
Shaybanids
Single source given which is biased and overstates case. Other references dont corroborate assertion.Tags: references removedMobile editMobile web edit
15:5015:50, 19 May 2020diffhist−526
Khalifa Haftar
Sentences were not supported by the given references. In fact, the references directly contradicted the sentences.Tags: references removedMobile editMobile web edit