22 October 2010

• 03:50 03:50, 22 October 2010 diff hist +35‎ User talk:174.126.200.228 ‎ →‎Notice of edit warring
• 03:49 03:49, 22 October 2010 diff hist +238‎ User talk:174.126.200.228 ‎ →‎Notice of edit warring
• 03:45 03:45, 22 October 2010 diff hist +3,875‎ User talk:174.126.200.228 ‎ →‎Notice of edit warring

21 October 2010

• 03:09 03:09, 21 October 2010 diff hist +800‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ Undid revision 391960420 by Dbrodbeck ( talk) no consensus to remove this... see the history of the edit...
• 03:08 03:08, 21 October 2010 diff hist +497‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎Health concerns section's low standard
• 02:54 02:54, 21 October 2010 diff hist +1,135‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎RfC: Is relying on a fork a justifiable reason to block information on obesity?
• 02:37 02:37, 21 October 2010 diff hist +800‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ Undid revision 391927216 by Sciencewatcher ( talk) respond to the argument I made (this edit being ill-reasoned)
• 02:34 02:34, 21 October 2010 diff hist +718‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎Health concerns section's low standard

20 October 2010

• 18:11 18:11, 20 October 2010 diff hist +8‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎RfC: Is relying on a fork a justifiable reason to block information on obesity?: *elusive* formatting error
• 18:10 18:10, 20 October 2010 diff hist +4‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎RfC: Is relying on a fork a justifiable reason to block information on obesity?: formatting error
• 18:08 18:08, 20 October 2010 diff hist +800‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ This is a brand new edit by SW with a seperate discussion. Plz vote there http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Monosodium_glutamate#Health_concerns_section.27s_low_standard
• 18:06 18:06, 20 October 2010 diff hist +3,045‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎RfC: Is relying on a fork a justifiable reason to block information on obesity?
• 04:02 04:02, 20 October 2010 diff hist +63‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎RfC: Is relying on a fork a justifiable reason to block information on obesity?
• 04:00 04:00, 20 October 2010 diff hist −1‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎RfC: Is relying on a fork a justifiable reason to block information on obesity?
• 03:59 03:59, 20 October 2010 diff hist +3,016‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎No edit summary
• 03:48 03:48, 20 October 2010 diff hist +800‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ Undid revision 391570341 by Sciencewatcher ( talk) this has a discussion section, lets address the issues @ 'Health concerns sec..
• 03:45 03:45, 20 October 2010 diff hist +636‎ User talk:Looie496 ‎ →‎Wikipedia consensus to no longer be discussion driven and now based on voting?
• 03:38 03:38, 20 October 2010 diff hist +337‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎edits by 174.126.200.228
• 03:02 03:02, 20 October 2010 diff hist +437‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎edits by 174.126.200.228
• 02:56 02:56, 20 October 2010 diff hist +1,049‎ User talk:Looie496 ‎ →‎Wikipedia consensus to no longer be discussion driven and now based on voting?: new section

19 October 2010

• 01:49 01:49, 19 October 2010 diff hist −1‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎edits by 174.126.200.228: Changed 'impresive' to 'legitamate', since impresive would be an unreasonable expectation in this case
• 01:46 01:46, 19 October 2010 diff hist +1,411‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎edits by 174.126.200.228
• 01:44 01:44, 19 October 2010 diff hist +4,959‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎Health concerns section's low standard
• 01:44 01:44, 19 October 2010 diff hist +453‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎Health concerns: Your response didn't contain an argument SW, you may have not read all of the post I made?
• 01:41 01:41, 19 October 2010 diff hist +800‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ Undo of Sciencewatcher's hasty removal of the "Asia" sub header

16 October 2010

• 04:48 04:48, 16 October 2010 diff hist +453‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎Health concerns: They're actually proposing something be removed from a paragraph with established consensus. The paragraph achieved consensus after adressing an npov objection.
• 04:45 04:45, 16 October 2010 diff hist −183‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎edits by 174.126.200.228
• 04:41 04:41, 16 October 2010 diff hist +583‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎edits by 174.126.200.228

15 October 2010

• 03:43 03:43, 15 October 2010 diff hist +452‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ Undid revision 390664729 by VMS Mosaic ( talk) It's in talk page, there's just some eagerness among the dissenting party
• 03:41 03:41, 15 October 2010 diff hist +6,594‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎edits by 174.126.200.228

14 October 2010

• 03:03 03:03, 14 October 2010 diff hist +452‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ Undid revision 390487133 It's meant to include relevant information on obesity in the article. We aren't even near to the WP:LIMIT on size. See WP:POVFORK
• 03:01 03:01, 14 October 2010 diff hist +3,088‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎edits by 174.126.200.228

13 October 2010

• 04:37 04:37, 13 October 2010 diff hist +365‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎edits by 174.126.200.228
• 04:33 04:33, 13 October 2010 diff hist +452‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ Undid revision 390275498 by Sciencewatcher Rats are a model for human obesity research. The effect of MSG them is note worthy.

12 October 2010

• 04:40 04:40, 12 October 2010 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎edits by 174.126.200.228: three main peicese of info, not four.
• 04:36 04:36, 12 October 2010 diff hist +1,666‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎edits by 174.126.200.228
• 04:33 04:33, 12 October 2010 diff hist −356‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎Health concerns: trimmed obesity paragraph

11 October 2010

• 04:54 04:54, 11 October 2010 diff hist +221‎ User talk:174.126.200.228 ‎ →‎MSG
• 04:53 04:53, 11 October 2010 diff hist +1,373‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎Health concerns: Obesity association mentioned (expanded to include a study on Chinese adults)
• 04:46 04:46, 11 October 2010 diff hist +1,377‎ Talk:Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎edits by 174.126.200.228

10 October 2010

• 01:04 01:04, 10 October 2010 diff hist +1,004‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ Due to the threat of individuals carrying out political agendas, Wikipedia cannot work through votes as you insist. Valid objections must be made; fallacies obviate discussion.

9 October 2010

• 01:18 01:18, 9 October 2010 diff hist +561‎ User talk:174.126.200.228 ‎ →‎MSG
• 01:02 01:02, 9 October 2010 diff hist +431‎ User talk:174.126.200.228 ‎ →‎MSG
• 00:54 00:54, 9 October 2010 diff hist +1,004‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ Read the original edit, then read the undo's summary and compare it to perfect solution fallacy. Then review Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ#Lack_of_neutrality_as_an_excuse_to_delete

8 October 2010

• 00:18 00:18, 8 October 2010 diff hist +439‎ User talk:174.126.200.228 ‎ →‎MSG
• 00:13 00:13, 8 October 2010 diff hist +1,004‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ Undid revision 389268209 by VMS Mosaic ( talk) No reason for edit given.

7 October 2010

• 01:38 01:38, 7 October 2010 diff hist +1,004‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ Undid revision 389030436 No one is forcing you to write anything that you don't want to; it's just inappropriate to undo an edit based on the perfect solution fallacy

5 October 2010

• 23:30 23:30, 5 October 2010 diff hist +1,004‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ Undid revision 388851683 by Sciencewatcher ( talk) If there's something you feel I left out (on purpose apparently) then plz add it

4 October 2010

• 23:13 23:13, 4 October 2010 diff hist +1,004‎ Monosodium glutamate ‎ →‎Health concerns: Added mention of MSGs association with obesity. "You can't do an MSG article on wikipedia with out at least mentioning the link to obesity."

24 September 2010

• 00:20 00:20, 24 September 2010 diff hist +364‎ Talk:Funding of science ‎ →‎More work on the research funding process