22:4722:47, 6 May 2013diffhist+60
Plyler v. Doe
→See also: there is a subsequent supreme court case (9 years later) that addresses a factually similar incident/ statute and comes to a different conclusion.
3 May 2013
18:0318:03, 3 May 2013diffhist+12
Hanna v. Plumer
→Background of the case: inserted language direct from the federal rules of civil procedure 4(e)(2)(b). Language was "who resides at the" as this distinction is critical for a proper service of process in the US.
22:4722:47, 6 May 2013diffhist+60
Plyler v. Doe
→See also: there is a subsequent supreme court case (9 years later) that addresses a factually similar incident/ statute and comes to a different conclusion.
3 May 2013
18:0318:03, 3 May 2013diffhist+12
Hanna v. Plumer
→Background of the case: inserted language direct from the federal rules of civil procedure 4(e)(2)(b). Language was "who resides at the" as this distinction is critical for a proper service of process in the US.