23:1723:17, 10 November 2014diffhist−35
Siberian tiger
removed Geptner as a source here. This statement is vague and unsupported. Actual observations and studies should take precedence
21:0221:02, 10 November 2014diffhist−507
Brown bear
restored study statement and removed Geptner as a source. His claim is vague and unsupported. Actual observations should that precedent
20:5020:50, 10 November 2014diffhist−434
Brown bear
NPOV, just because he mentions 2 cases doesn't mean those are the only ones. Also, what about the other source?
20:4520:45, 10 November 2014diffhist−52
Siberian tiger
they are "expectations" in YOUR opinion, you also have no proof of Geptner being the "consensus". Actual studies should take precedent over generalized statements.
23:1723:17, 10 November 2014diffhist−35
Siberian tiger
removed Geptner as a source here. This statement is vague and unsupported. Actual observations and studies should take precedence
21:0221:02, 10 November 2014diffhist−507
Brown bear
restored study statement and removed Geptner as a source. His claim is vague and unsupported. Actual observations should that precedent
20:5020:50, 10 November 2014diffhist−434
Brown bear
NPOV, just because he mentions 2 cases doesn't mean those are the only ones. Also, what about the other source?
20:4520:45, 10 November 2014diffhist−52
Siberian tiger
they are "expectations" in YOUR opinion, you also have no proof of Geptner being the "consensus". Actual studies should take precedent over generalized statements.