14:1014:10, 9 December 2021diffhist−16
Lithuania–Taiwan relations
→History: That was not China's wording, nor is the wording provided consistent with what "expelling an ambassador" means. Wikipedia is not the place for such partisan, emotional language (remember, Neutral POV)
13:5413:54, 9 December 2021diffhist+264
Lithuania–Taiwan relations
Please stop vandalizing the article; it looks like you have a distaste for investigative media and refuse to engage on Talk on this; how about providing references that actually back your points?
13:5013:50, 9 December 2021diffhist−9
Lithuania–Taiwan relations
All Lithuanian officials have unequivocally stated Lithuania does not have diplomatic relations with Taiwan; consular services do not make TRO a diplomatic mission (please check relevant definitions); what Lithuanian officials say on the subject takes precedence over how English-language media spins it
13:2213:22, 9 December 2021diffhist+469
Lithuania–Taiwan relations
The previous editor was wrong to consider this editorializing; the referenced article is by a former Lithuanian minister in a top-2 mainstream media in Lithuania; understanding the naming controversy is key to understanding Lithuania-PRC-ROC relations in 2021; PRC has clearly stated that they object to the naming of the office in Lithuania, NOT to trade and cultural relations between Lithuania and TaiwanTag: Reverted
13:0913:09, 9 December 2021diffhist−382
Lithuania–Taiwan relations
→History: Inclusion of supposed Lithuanian choice between PRC and ROC opens a can of worms we should avoid - unless we want to expand this subject in a fair, consistent and balanced way, which does not seem to be the preference of some of the other editors. SCMP article is editorializing and not reporting on the issue; SCMP is not a trustworthy source on this (especially if sole source; its ownership history has resulted in a clear editorial slant regarding West-China relations)Tag: references removed
12:4112:41, 9 December 2021diffhist+6
Lithuania–Taiwan relations
→History: Again, editorializing; expelling an ambassador is something different; furthermore this is not how the event is characterized by a large majority of the media, Lithuanian, Chinese or otherwise
12:3512:35, 9 December 2021diffhist+258
Lithuania–Taiwan relations
The previous editor is comparing apples to oranges; they inserted a reference re: Bank of Lithuania statistics but those are not statistics on Taiwanese credit card transactions in Lithuania (BoL does not gather such data); I am reinserting report from Lithuanian media that implicitly found the Taiwanese announcement unrealistic, untrue, or not backed by evidence on the ground; 15min is famous for their investigations, including their collaboration vs fake news with Facebook.
14:3214:32, 4 December 2021diffhist+3,371
China–Lithuania relations
Wikipedia has no policy against IP contributors and does not differentiate between registered and unregistered users; I suggest users cease attacking fellow users, refrain from edit-warring and reach consensus on Talk page first.Tag: Reverted
14:1014:10, 9 December 2021diffhist−16
Lithuania–Taiwan relations
→History: That was not China's wording, nor is the wording provided consistent with what "expelling an ambassador" means. Wikipedia is not the place for such partisan, emotional language (remember, Neutral POV)
13:5413:54, 9 December 2021diffhist+264
Lithuania–Taiwan relations
Please stop vandalizing the article; it looks like you have a distaste for investigative media and refuse to engage on Talk on this; how about providing references that actually back your points?
13:5013:50, 9 December 2021diffhist−9
Lithuania–Taiwan relations
All Lithuanian officials have unequivocally stated Lithuania does not have diplomatic relations with Taiwan; consular services do not make TRO a diplomatic mission (please check relevant definitions); what Lithuanian officials say on the subject takes precedence over how English-language media spins it
13:2213:22, 9 December 2021diffhist+469
Lithuania–Taiwan relations
The previous editor was wrong to consider this editorializing; the referenced article is by a former Lithuanian minister in a top-2 mainstream media in Lithuania; understanding the naming controversy is key to understanding Lithuania-PRC-ROC relations in 2021; PRC has clearly stated that they object to the naming of the office in Lithuania, NOT to trade and cultural relations between Lithuania and TaiwanTag: Reverted
13:0913:09, 9 December 2021diffhist−382
Lithuania–Taiwan relations
→History: Inclusion of supposed Lithuanian choice between PRC and ROC opens a can of worms we should avoid - unless we want to expand this subject in a fair, consistent and balanced way, which does not seem to be the preference of some of the other editors. SCMP article is editorializing and not reporting on the issue; SCMP is not a trustworthy source on this (especially if sole source; its ownership history has resulted in a clear editorial slant regarding West-China relations)Tag: references removed
12:4112:41, 9 December 2021diffhist+6
Lithuania–Taiwan relations
→History: Again, editorializing; expelling an ambassador is something different; furthermore this is not how the event is characterized by a large majority of the media, Lithuanian, Chinese or otherwise
12:3512:35, 9 December 2021diffhist+258
Lithuania–Taiwan relations
The previous editor is comparing apples to oranges; they inserted a reference re: Bank of Lithuania statistics but those are not statistics on Taiwanese credit card transactions in Lithuania (BoL does not gather such data); I am reinserting report from Lithuanian media that implicitly found the Taiwanese announcement unrealistic, untrue, or not backed by evidence on the ground; 15min is famous for their investigations, including their collaboration vs fake news with Facebook.
14:3214:32, 4 December 2021diffhist+3,371
China–Lithuania relations
Wikipedia has no policy against IP contributors and does not differentiate between registered and unregistered users; I suggest users cease attacking fellow users, refrain from edit-warring and reach consensus on Talk page first.Tag: Reverted