18:2218:22, 4 September 2012diffhist−1
Poop sex
Undid revision 510206039 by AvicBot. This explains why Wikipedia is not a good source for info and I do not trust a lot on it, like how about a bot that links poop sex to a renown classical composer? Sadly, some staunch editors refuse to admit such issue.current
18:2218:22, 4 September 2012diffhist−1
Poop sex
Undid revision 510206039 by AvicBot. This explains why Wikipedia is not a good source for info and I do not trust a lot on it, like how about a bot that links poop sex to a renown classical composer? Sadly, some staunch editors refuse to admit such issue.current