15:1315:13, 17 July 2019diffhist−338
SIGGRAPH
→Overview: The statement about SIGGRAPH's prestige is absolutely true. That said the source does not fully support the text and it will be almost impossible to defend this language from editors not familiar with the conferenceTag: references removed
14:5714:57, 17 July 2019diffhist−29
SIGGRAPH
I don't see the required information on the talk page and this article is certainly not promotional in characterTag: COI template removed
11:5411:54, 17 July 2019diffhist+42
Direct Action Everywhere
This tag is now in play again as I have detected at least one more connected contributor editing on an undisclosed basis and believe more have been at work in the past
11:0911:09, 17 July 2019diffhist+68
Wayne Hsiung
The claim is not flimsy. There has been extensive POV editing by at least one connected contributor and this text has not been vetted. Keep this up and I will take this to COIN and they will probably reduce this article to stub.Tag: Undo
15:1315:13, 17 July 2019diffhist−338
SIGGRAPH
→Overview: The statement about SIGGRAPH's prestige is absolutely true. That said the source does not fully support the text and it will be almost impossible to defend this language from editors not familiar with the conferenceTag: references removed
14:5714:57, 17 July 2019diffhist−29
SIGGRAPH
I don't see the required information on the talk page and this article is certainly not promotional in characterTag: COI template removed
11:5411:54, 17 July 2019diffhist+42
Direct Action Everywhere
This tag is now in play again as I have detected at least one more connected contributor editing on an undisclosed basis and believe more have been at work in the past
11:0911:09, 17 July 2019diffhist+68
Wayne Hsiung
The claim is not flimsy. There has been extensive POV editing by at least one connected contributor and this text has not been vetted. Keep this up and I will take this to COIN and they will probably reduce this article to stub.Tag: Undo