23:2723:27, 17 July 2020diffhist−10
Stone Mountain
The article begins with an Editors note stating that it was a 2017 reprint of an article from '''2015'''. Also undo recent rephrasing by
User:PFHLai. Either it is "the most visited" or it is not, what are the facts? If it is only '''"considered"'' then it needs to be said considered by whom?
23:1723:17, 17 July 2020diffhist−38
Bruce Almighty
Remove unsourced Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic scores. Best leave specific details to the sequel article. (I could have added proper references but this seemed like the best option.)
07:1407:14, 17 July 2020diffhist+26
Justice League (film)
Roundup praises "performances of ... Gadot ... Momoa ... Miller ", strange to omit Momoa, but probably better to start the paragraph without that detail. Add reference to image caption to show source of claim that they were praised (not that I find CBR convincing but at least show your work).
23:2723:27, 17 July 2020diffhist−10
Stone Mountain
The article begins with an Editors note stating that it was a 2017 reprint of an article from '''2015'''. Also undo recent rephrasing by
User:PFHLai. Either it is "the most visited" or it is not, what are the facts? If it is only '''"considered"'' then it needs to be said considered by whom?
23:1723:17, 17 July 2020diffhist−38
Bruce Almighty
Remove unsourced Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic scores. Best leave specific details to the sequel article. (I could have added proper references but this seemed like the best option.)
07:1407:14, 17 July 2020diffhist+26
Justice League (film)
Roundup praises "performances of ... Gadot ... Momoa ... Miller ", strange to omit Momoa, but probably better to start the paragraph without that detail. Add reference to image caption to show source of claim that they were praised (not that I find CBR convincing but at least show your work).