01:0201:02, 17 October 2021diffhist+23
The Golden Child
There is nothing to support the claim that "The film became a cult film after its release." People seem to add "cult" claims everywhere with no sources at all. Dance did say some people called it their favorite film but that is still far from the same thing as saying the film has achieved "cult status"
17:0217:02, 16 October 2021diffhist−201
Soul Man (film)
There's no need to repeat that same reference, it should be clear to most reasonable people that the references covers both sentences of the short paragraph.Tag: references removed
16:2216:22, 16 October 2021diffhist−14
The Golden Child
Partially revert. Restore
Template:Short description but keep fix for typo in date. See the template documentation, short description is about disambiguating it from other simliar terms, so mentioning a key person like the director (or star) is better than a generic description.
13:2213:22, 16 October 2021diffhist+6
Soul Man (film)
WP:EL Reviews should be included in Reception section not the External links section. Remove Roger Ebert review from EL as it is already included in the Reception section.
13:1813:18, 16 October 2021diffhist−189
Soul Man (film)
Rotten Tomatoes 13% is not any kind of "mixed" and
User:Frschoonover should not have made claims about the what the reviews were like at the time of release without sources to support that statement. Also poor phrasing see /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Archive_48#Mixed_to_positive_/_Mixed_to_negative Undid revision 1037779708 by
FrschoonoverTag: Undo
01:0201:02, 17 October 2021diffhist+23
The Golden Child
There is nothing to support the claim that "The film became a cult film after its release." People seem to add "cult" claims everywhere with no sources at all. Dance did say some people called it their favorite film but that is still far from the same thing as saying the film has achieved "cult status"
17:0217:02, 16 October 2021diffhist−201
Soul Man (film)
There's no need to repeat that same reference, it should be clear to most reasonable people that the references covers both sentences of the short paragraph.Tag: references removed
16:2216:22, 16 October 2021diffhist−14
The Golden Child
Partially revert. Restore
Template:Short description but keep fix for typo in date. See the template documentation, short description is about disambiguating it from other simliar terms, so mentioning a key person like the director (or star) is better than a generic description.
13:2213:22, 16 October 2021diffhist+6
Soul Man (film)
WP:EL Reviews should be included in Reception section not the External links section. Remove Roger Ebert review from EL as it is already included in the Reception section.
13:1813:18, 16 October 2021diffhist−189
Soul Man (film)
Rotten Tomatoes 13% is not any kind of "mixed" and
User:Frschoonover should not have made claims about the what the reviews were like at the time of release without sources to support that statement. Also poor phrasing see /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Archive_48#Mixed_to_positive_/_Mixed_to_negative Undid revision 1037779708 by
FrschoonoverTag: Undo