13 April 2015

• 16:19 16:19, 13 April 2015 diff hist 0‎ Who Stole Feminism? ‎ Percent symbol after numbers, not before.
• 08:55 08:55, 13 April 2015 diff hist +1,549‎ Talk:Rape statistics ‎ →‎Rape by use of alcohol bit

12 April 2015

• 14:04 14:04, 12 April 2015 diff hist +4,088‎ User talk:Padenton ‎ How do I science? Reliably?
• 10:08 10:08, 12 April 2015 diff hist +3‎ Murder of Linda Cook ‎ minor edit. Grammar "correction" that might be considered unnecessary; open to criticism.

9 April 2015

• 14:40 14:40, 9 April 2015 diff hist +390‎ Talk:Rape statistics ‎ →‎Rape by use of alcohol bit
• 14:14 14:14, 9 April 2015 diff hist +2,253‎ Talk:Rape statistics ‎ →‎Why is Steven Pinker's non-notable book quoted from?

8 April 2015

• 15:48 15:48, 8 April 2015 diff hist +1,262‎ Talk:Rape statistics ‎ A "statistic" without data doesn't belong on an encyclopedia. This shouldn't even have to be argued...
• 15:06 15:06, 8 April 2015 diff hist +9,810‎ Talk:Rape statistics ‎ →‎Under-reporting: Statistics and stuff.

30 March 2015

• 21:10 21:10, 30 March 2015 diff hist −428‎ Rape statistics ‎ Undid revision 654159785 by Gavleson ( talk) Discuss controversial material on the talk page if you feel it should remain in the article. Do not reinstate controversial material prior to consensus.
• 09:57 09:57, 30 March 2015 diff hist −428‎ Rape statistics ‎ The protocol is Bold, Revert, Discuss. I reverted, and others are to wait for consensus before reinstating content.

29 March 2015

• 23:11 23:11, 29 March 2015 diff hist −428‎ Rape statistics ‎ Undid hostile revision by OccultZone. Edit warring while refusing to participate in talk page discussion.
• 23:07 23:07, 29 March 2015 diff hist +976‎ Talk:Rape statistics ‎ →‎Under-reporting
• 17:28 17:28, 29 March 2015 diff hist −470‎ Rape statistics ‎ Undid revision 654034206 by Padenton ( talk)
• 17:22 17:22, 29 March 2015 diff hist +1,865‎ User talk:Padenton ‎ The government is always credible. I am not a crook.
• 16:09 16:09, 29 March 2015 diff hist +1,152‎ User talk:Padenton ‎ →‎"Disruptive" editing: new section
• 10:15 10:15, 29 March 2015 diff hist −470‎ Rape statistics ‎ Poor source, reach consensus in talk page before reverting.
• 10:10 10:10, 29 March 2015 diff hist −48‎ List of Super NES enhancement chips ‎ Improved a revision that changed the original meaning and was still confusing.

22 March 2015

• 20:38 20:38, 22 March 2015 diff hist −470‎ Rape statistics ‎ Poor source, reach consensus in "Under-reporting" section of talk page before making changes.
• 20:19 20:19, 22 March 2015 diff hist −20‎ Arsenal ‎ Removed redundancy and cleaned up punctuation.

16 February 2015

• 00:47 00:47, 16 February 2015 diff hist −474‎ Rape statistics ‎ Poor source. See talk page.

3 February 2015

• 01:35 01:35, 3 February 2015 diff hist +803‎ Talk:Estimates of sexual violence ‎ →‎Lifetime incidence of rape in USA women
• 01:24 01:24, 3 February 2015 diff hist −474‎ Rape statistics ‎ Poor source. See talk page.

10 August 2014

• 00:56 00:56, 10 August 2014 diff hist 0‎ Tylenol (brand) ‎ Minor correction of study size

6 July 2014

• 13:05 13:05, 6 July 2014 diff hist −2‎ Standard Zhuang ‎ Fixed minor grammar error: "vocabulary is a based"

29 May 2014

• 03:11 03:11, 29 May 2014 diff hist −1,248‎ Brainfuck ‎ See talk page for detailed issued of neutrality and notability. Tag: section blanking
• 03:10 03:10, 29 May 2014 diff hist +18,777‎ Talk:Brainfuck ‎ Explained revision that is being reversed without consensus

27 May 2014

• 19:05 19:05, 27 May 2014 diff hist +2‎ Brainfuck ‎ Added newline to correctly mark section start
• 19:03 19:03, 27 May 2014 diff hist +85‎ Brainfuck ‎ Added appropriate tags to address problems with individual statements as well as section as a whole

25 May 2014

• 22:25 22:25, 25 May 2014 diff hist +147‎ Talk:Brainfuck ‎ →‎In re "Interpretation as art" section
• 22:19 22:19, 25 May 2014 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Brainfuck ‎ Fixed indentation of bullets.
• 21:24 21:24, 25 May 2014 diff hist −74‎ Talk:Brainfuck ‎ Added source of book review that is intelligible to Talk page formatting (lack of citations section, but ability to use normal citing method)
• 21:16 21:16, 25 May 2014 diff hist +742‎ Talk:Brainfuck ‎ →‎practical use
• 20:47 20:47, 25 May 2014 diff hist −1,081‎ Brainfuck ‎ We do not need a postmodern interpretation of every non-traditional contribution to technical fields such as computer science. Wikipedia is not a postmodern or New Media critique archive. See Talk page for more thorough justification. Tag: section blanking
• 20:44 20:44, 25 May 2014 diff hist +7,428‎ Talk:Brainfuck ‎ →‎In re "Interpretation as art" section

23 May 2014

• 18:54 18:54, 23 May 2014 diff hist −1,081‎ Brainfuck ‎ →‎Interpretation as art: We do not need a postmodern interpretation of every non-traditional contribution to technical fields such as computer science. Tag: section blanking