18:2618:26, 17 October 2015diffhist−2
Miserere (Allegri)
→Recordings: If it is indeed said to be celebrated in the ref, then "celebrated" needs no "so-called" quotes. Just say (paraphrase) what the ref says. Does the ref really say it's "celebrated" though?
17:4017:40, 10 October 2015diffhist−28
Carol Burnett
→Personal life: The problem here wasn't a lack of a citation, but that the reference was included as part of the text. Moved the reference to an inline citation. The formatting of the citation can use some improvement though.
7 October 2015
01:5701:57, 7 October 2015diffhist−86
Crispus Attucks
Removed out-of-place remark, not a summary of material in main text. Not sourced. With a source (and maybe a little more detail about the matter), it can be put back, but it should be in the "Early life" section where it would fit better.
00:3100:31, 7 October 2015diffhist−39
Atomic demolition munition
→Military uses: "Recent" is subjective/ambiguous. Also, the source of a purported fact is usually off topic for inclusion in text (as is so here). Source is given here (properly) via the inline citations. Reworded to straightforwardly state the fact.
6 October 2015
23:4823:48, 6 October 2015diffhist+2
Castle Bravo
→Fallout: American spelling. Subject is more American than British, the rest of the article is also already established in American style. Also, the error was America's fault so we should take ALL the blame! Right? :-)
08:5608:56, 5 October 2015diffhist−154
Dan Carlin
→Common Sense: Almost the whole article is unsourced original analysis. There are a few "factual" statements (but still unsourced!). This is OR and subjective in addition to the usual unsourced.
20:2620:26, 29 September 2015diffhist−2,105
Radio-controlled aircraft
Rmvd dubious "wing location" theses. What's "easy to fly" is OR and dubious + ambiguous. Vertical CG affects dihedral effect, but not so much that it can't be compensated for by increased dihedral angle, etc. Conclusions about mid-wing were just nutty.
17:0917:09, 29 September 2015diffhist−34
Mother Earth News
Sentence smithing. Split up run-on (it was a long single-sentence paragraph). "Saner" is still problematic (POV). "Better", "meaningfull" are also still subjective.
01:1101:11, 28 September 2015diffhist−15
Vladimir Pozner Jr.
→Personal life: What's "interesting" is subjective, unencyclopedic. If it's notable and well-enough ref'd, then simply say it as a fact. "Interestingly," is magazine-article style, not encyclopedic style.
00:4900:49, 28 September 2015diffhist+17
Phil Donahue
→The Phil Donahue Show: Removed off-topic digression. Adjusted time setting of the remark to not be open ended. (left the commentary hidden (vs. deleting) so as to serve editing after 2015 when those "results are in")
04:3404:34, 23 September 2015diffhist−1,020
Gorongosa National Park
→Mount Gorongosa: Removed unsourced POV blather complained about in the tag. Stuck to the basic facts rather than the "verdant land" "peaceful people" subjective POV drivel. The "2000 people" fact could use a citation.
18:2618:26, 17 October 2015diffhist−2
Miserere (Allegri)
→Recordings: If it is indeed said to be celebrated in the ref, then "celebrated" needs no "so-called" quotes. Just say (paraphrase) what the ref says. Does the ref really say it's "celebrated" though?
17:4017:40, 10 October 2015diffhist−28
Carol Burnett
→Personal life: The problem here wasn't a lack of a citation, but that the reference was included as part of the text. Moved the reference to an inline citation. The formatting of the citation can use some improvement though.
7 October 2015
01:5701:57, 7 October 2015diffhist−86
Crispus Attucks
Removed out-of-place remark, not a summary of material in main text. Not sourced. With a source (and maybe a little more detail about the matter), it can be put back, but it should be in the "Early life" section where it would fit better.
00:3100:31, 7 October 2015diffhist−39
Atomic demolition munition
→Military uses: "Recent" is subjective/ambiguous. Also, the source of a purported fact is usually off topic for inclusion in text (as is so here). Source is given here (properly) via the inline citations. Reworded to straightforwardly state the fact.
6 October 2015
23:4823:48, 6 October 2015diffhist+2
Castle Bravo
→Fallout: American spelling. Subject is more American than British, the rest of the article is also already established in American style. Also, the error was America's fault so we should take ALL the blame! Right? :-)
08:5608:56, 5 October 2015diffhist−154
Dan Carlin
→Common Sense: Almost the whole article is unsourced original analysis. There are a few "factual" statements (but still unsourced!). This is OR and subjective in addition to the usual unsourced.
20:2620:26, 29 September 2015diffhist−2,105
Radio-controlled aircraft
Rmvd dubious "wing location" theses. What's "easy to fly" is OR and dubious + ambiguous. Vertical CG affects dihedral effect, but not so much that it can't be compensated for by increased dihedral angle, etc. Conclusions about mid-wing were just nutty.
17:0917:09, 29 September 2015diffhist−34
Mother Earth News
Sentence smithing. Split up run-on (it was a long single-sentence paragraph). "Saner" is still problematic (POV). "Better", "meaningfull" are also still subjective.
01:1101:11, 28 September 2015diffhist−15
Vladimir Pozner Jr.
→Personal life: What's "interesting" is subjective, unencyclopedic. If it's notable and well-enough ref'd, then simply say it as a fact. "Interestingly," is magazine-article style, not encyclopedic style.
00:4900:49, 28 September 2015diffhist+17
Phil Donahue
→The Phil Donahue Show: Removed off-topic digression. Adjusted time setting of the remark to not be open ended. (left the commentary hidden (vs. deleting) so as to serve editing after 2015 when those "results are in")
04:3404:34, 23 September 2015diffhist−1,020
Gorongosa National Park
→Mount Gorongosa: Removed unsourced POV blather complained about in the tag. Stuck to the basic facts rather than the "verdant land" "peaceful people" subjective POV drivel. The "2000 people" fact could use a citation.