02:5102:51, 18 April 2018diffhist+2,995
Papaver somniferum
Reverted to the version that does not have a section with citations from the New York Times and Washington Post deleted in vandalism designed to be a show of force because I defended my content additions and grammar improvements against a prior reckless reversion. Two editors are now clearly in cahoots and the article is suffering for it. It's too easy to destroy content on this site when editors act in bad faith. Wikipedia suffers for it. See Talk and stop the destruction of even grammar fixes.
20:5120:51, 17 April 2018diffhist+1,592
Papaver somniferum
reverted destructive vandalism revert. Do not edit war. If you have specific improvements to make to the edits then make those specific improvements. Your complaint is unfounded, overly-broad, and not at all constructive. The first revert of the minor grammatical change was fine as I had misread that sentence. The rest of my additions, however, are of high quality. The grammar improvements in particular are totally objective. Justify your changes or don't engage in vandalism power plays.
18:4418:44, 17 April 2018diffhist+1,516
Pieris oleracea
→Host-plants: reviewed the citation and it does not say they are adapting. It says they "may" be adapting. It also says 60-100 generations "may" be needed to determine if it "may" be adapting. Improved formatting of the citation of that thesis.
18:2118:21, 17 April 2018diffhist−88
Pieris oleracea
removed extremely dubious unsourced statement (contradicts all of the research I have encountered on the subject), removed weasel language ("certain populations")
02:5102:51, 18 April 2018diffhist+2,995
Papaver somniferum
Reverted to the version that does not have a section with citations from the New York Times and Washington Post deleted in vandalism designed to be a show of force because I defended my content additions and grammar improvements against a prior reckless reversion. Two editors are now clearly in cahoots and the article is suffering for it. It's too easy to destroy content on this site when editors act in bad faith. Wikipedia suffers for it. See Talk and stop the destruction of even grammar fixes.
20:5120:51, 17 April 2018diffhist+1,592
Papaver somniferum
reverted destructive vandalism revert. Do not edit war. If you have specific improvements to make to the edits then make those specific improvements. Your complaint is unfounded, overly-broad, and not at all constructive. The first revert of the minor grammatical change was fine as I had misread that sentence. The rest of my additions, however, are of high quality. The grammar improvements in particular are totally objective. Justify your changes or don't engage in vandalism power plays.
18:4418:44, 17 April 2018diffhist+1,516
Pieris oleracea
→Host-plants: reviewed the citation and it does not say they are adapting. It says they "may" be adapting. It also says 60-100 generations "may" be needed to determine if it "may" be adapting. Improved formatting of the citation of that thesis.
18:2118:21, 17 April 2018diffhist−88
Pieris oleracea
removed extremely dubious unsourced statement (contradicts all of the research I have encountered on the subject), removed weasel language ("certain populations")