05:2905:29, 14 February 2021diffhist−405
Al Jazeera Arabic
Undid revision 1006662214 by
174.254.192.112 (
talk): The “sourced content” fails inline-verification connotatively, oui fellow IP editor!( As already explained, the said citation is already placed where it's relevant.) Maybe you should try bothering to understand the background behind edits made by the said registered-user, too — unless you haven't reverted my edit in good-faith (i.e. are “like-minded”, as I conveyed).Tags: Undoreferences removed
03:2503:25, 14 February 2021diffhist−210
Al Jazeera America
Undid revision 1006458542 by
Fahadharbi (
talk): Already a defunct channel since years. What's the point of adding something which preceded even its founding? The citations say nothing in particular about AJAM, yet a-gain. Thusly: Had to revert here, as well. For others reading this: Ref to my contributions-history to get the context, if not this newbie.Tags: Undoreferences removed
03:1803:18, 14 February 2021diffhist−121
Al Jazeera Documentary Channel
Undid revision 1006458223 by
Fahadharbi (
talk): Also reverted here. Ref to my contributions-history to get the context, if not this newbie. But yes.. This stub needs not just compliant-expansion, but even removal of junk and hence: Removed the redundant parameters of "network"+"owner" and replaced it with a single, far more precise parameter.Tag: references removed
03:0803:08, 14 February 2021diffhist−207
Al Jazeera Mubasher
Undid revision 1006458378 by
Fahadharbi (
talk): Same tendentious-editing, same messaging conveyed. That's enough! It's clearly
WP:DE across all of AJMN-related articles linked in the infobox by somebody clearly here for
WP:ADVOCACY — beyond any realm of reasonable-doubt whatsoever. While I would say that I preferred the infobox-parameter spacing by this newbie, my preferences don't matter as
User:GhostInTheMachine is pro.Tags: UndoRevertedreferences removed
02:5802:58, 14 February 2021diffhist−373
AJ+
Undid revision 1006459495 by
Fahadharbi (
talk) Part of the very same tendentious-editing pattern leading to this lazy addition in 2 edits. Let it be known,
WP:NOTSOURCE so aggressively copy-pasting an information from the infobox of one sister-article (
Al Jazeera English here, RIIIGGGGHHHT?) to another does send a signal you're
WP:NOTHERE. & in any case, "2 wrongs don't make a right" and yes, a hidden-note is over there.
02:3802:38, 14 February 2021diffhist−857
Al Jazeera English
Undid revision 1006459809 by
Fahadharbi (
talk): "Founder" addition, whilst allowed in the infoboxes of television channels — seem to have been added rather haphazardly with citations saying nothing specific about the establishment of AJE. Appears like part of the very same editing-pattern. Wikipedia is not supposed to stand
WP:ADVOCACY and hence, unless they or anybody else like-minded come around: Such edits shall be reverted.Tag: Undo
02:2702:27, 14 February 2021diffhist−405
Al Jazeera Arabic
Undid all revs by
Fahadharbi (
talk): Tendentious-editing by supposedly-newbie editor in restoring the urban-legend of "ownership" definition here, and a rather obsessive editing-pattern found on all of AJMN-assets listed in the infobox. They even added the same claim there, no bother to explain themselves in ES, & added that everywhere based on citations which are already in the article. Deceptive "minor" mark. No engagement on UTP.Tags: Revertedreferences removed
05:2905:29, 14 February 2021diffhist−405
Al Jazeera Arabic
Undid revision 1006662214 by
174.254.192.112 (
talk): The “sourced content” fails inline-verification connotatively, oui fellow IP editor!( As already explained, the said citation is already placed where it's relevant.) Maybe you should try bothering to understand the background behind edits made by the said registered-user, too — unless you haven't reverted my edit in good-faith (i.e. are “like-minded”, as I conveyed).Tags: Undoreferences removed
03:2503:25, 14 February 2021diffhist−210
Al Jazeera America
Undid revision 1006458542 by
Fahadharbi (
talk): Already a defunct channel since years. What's the point of adding something which preceded even its founding? The citations say nothing in particular about AJAM, yet a-gain. Thusly: Had to revert here, as well. For others reading this: Ref to my contributions-history to get the context, if not this newbie.Tags: Undoreferences removed
03:1803:18, 14 February 2021diffhist−121
Al Jazeera Documentary Channel
Undid revision 1006458223 by
Fahadharbi (
talk): Also reverted here. Ref to my contributions-history to get the context, if not this newbie. But yes.. This stub needs not just compliant-expansion, but even removal of junk and hence: Removed the redundant parameters of "network"+"owner" and replaced it with a single, far more precise parameter.Tag: references removed
03:0803:08, 14 February 2021diffhist−207
Al Jazeera Mubasher
Undid revision 1006458378 by
Fahadharbi (
talk): Same tendentious-editing, same messaging conveyed. That's enough! It's clearly
WP:DE across all of AJMN-related articles linked in the infobox by somebody clearly here for
WP:ADVOCACY — beyond any realm of reasonable-doubt whatsoever. While I would say that I preferred the infobox-parameter spacing by this newbie, my preferences don't matter as
User:GhostInTheMachine is pro.Tags: UndoRevertedreferences removed
02:5802:58, 14 February 2021diffhist−373
AJ+
Undid revision 1006459495 by
Fahadharbi (
talk) Part of the very same tendentious-editing pattern leading to this lazy addition in 2 edits. Let it be known,
WP:NOTSOURCE so aggressively copy-pasting an information from the infobox of one sister-article (
Al Jazeera English here, RIIIGGGGHHHT?) to another does send a signal you're
WP:NOTHERE. & in any case, "2 wrongs don't make a right" and yes, a hidden-note is over there.
02:3802:38, 14 February 2021diffhist−857
Al Jazeera English
Undid revision 1006459809 by
Fahadharbi (
talk): "Founder" addition, whilst allowed in the infoboxes of television channels — seem to have been added rather haphazardly with citations saying nothing specific about the establishment of AJE. Appears like part of the very same editing-pattern. Wikipedia is not supposed to stand
WP:ADVOCACY and hence, unless they or anybody else like-minded come around: Such edits shall be reverted.Tag: Undo
02:2702:27, 14 February 2021diffhist−405
Al Jazeera Arabic
Undid all revs by
Fahadharbi (
talk): Tendentious-editing by supposedly-newbie editor in restoring the urban-legend of "ownership" definition here, and a rather obsessive editing-pattern found on all of AJMN-assets listed in the infobox. They even added the same claim there, no bother to explain themselves in ES, & added that everywhere based on citations which are already in the article. Deceptive "minor" mark. No engagement on UTP.Tags: Revertedreferences removed