For 103.163.124.78
talk
block log
logs
filter log
4 April 2021
- 14:46 14:46, 4 April 2021 diff hist +8 Sam Harris Undid revision 1015927556 by Springee ( talk): Which “MOS”? Pls specify. Just to cut to the chase, if this is a reference to MOS:WORDS, or specificially MOS:WORDS (per WP:AGF) — it's clearly not a license for virtual blanket-ban for all the terminology mentioned, let alone those which r synonymous. Whereas WP:GEVAL is more clearer. Somebody's vague-rebuttal with almost direct-accusation≠deserving equal-weight to accused RSP Tags: Undo Reverted
- 09:03 09:03, 4 April 2021 diff hist +1,243 User talk:DolyaIskrina →About one of your edits on Sam Harris: new section
- 03:00 03:00, 4 April 2021 diff hist +8 Sam Harris Undid revision 1015878884: SPLC is a perennial RS in spite of ludicrously-high number of RfCs on them. Where's the RfC on Ms Weiss?( If there are EVEN equitable number of them.) To state a highly-contentious claim by her passively against an ironclad RSP, just because it happens to be a non-BLP — is a subtle mockery of community-consensus. Giving her opinions almost-directly accusing of bad-faith practice weight equal to SPLC's prof assessment fails GEVAL. Wanna retain wording? Do EXTRAORDINARY. Tags: Undo Reverted
 | This is the
contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
For 103.163.124.78
talk
block log
logs
filter log
4 April 2021
- 14:46 14:46, 4 April 2021 diff hist +8 Sam Harris Undid revision 1015927556 by Springee ( talk): Which “MOS”? Pls specify. Just to cut to the chase, if this is a reference to MOS:WORDS, or specificially MOS:WORDS (per WP:AGF) — it's clearly not a license for virtual blanket-ban for all the terminology mentioned, let alone those which r synonymous. Whereas WP:GEVAL is more clearer. Somebody's vague-rebuttal with almost direct-accusation≠deserving equal-weight to accused RSP Tags: Undo Reverted
- 09:03 09:03, 4 April 2021 diff hist +1,243 User talk:DolyaIskrina →About one of your edits on Sam Harris: new section
- 03:00 03:00, 4 April 2021 diff hist +8 Sam Harris Undid revision 1015878884: SPLC is a perennial RS in spite of ludicrously-high number of RfCs on them. Where's the RfC on Ms Weiss?( If there are EVEN equitable number of them.) To state a highly-contentious claim by her passively against an ironclad RSP, just because it happens to be a non-BLP — is a subtle mockery of community-consensus. Giving her opinions almost-directly accusing of bad-faith practice weight equal to SPLC's prof assessment fails GEVAL. Wanna retain wording? Do EXTRAORDINARY. Tags: Undo Reverted
|
| This is the
contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |