17:1417:14, 22 December 2015diffhist−92
Don Young
The lengthy portions dedicated to controversies is actually a problem, giving undue and unneeded weight. I kept the fact he has faced federal investigation but this part is not warranted or needed
16 December 2015
03:5103:51, 16 December 2015diffhist−92
Don Young
You cannot state in the lead that unless he is universally considered a controversial person, info about investigation was kept. If you're going to revert, please state why
08:1008:10, 14 December 2015diffhist+93
Kelli Ward
Please stop reverting with vague reasons; you refuse to discuss anything on the talk page and simply revert. If you're going to cite wiki policies, please read up on them
03:0003:00, 14 December 2015diffhist+93
Kelli Ward
If you're going to revert me, say why in the talk page; these one word/ vague reasons are not good wikipedia practice
13:4413:44, 13 December 2015diffhist+93
Kelli Ward
You were reverting me without giving any valid reason - usually telling me "Do not remove updated information" under false premise when I haven't removed any. Headlines are needed to break up different info
23:4123:41, 2 December 2015diffhist+1,337
Kelli Ward
Undid revision 693462138 by
Calibrador (
talk) - I did not remove any information, you did. Please discuss on talk page before breaking the three revert ruleTag: Non-autoconfirmed user rapidly reverting edits
18:3418:34, 2 December 2015diffhist+1,125
Kelli Ward
You keep reverting pertinent sourced information without a single reason. Your support of Senator Ward is appreciated, but cannot get in the way of wikipedia's high standards
00:1700:17, 18 November 2015diffhist+924
Kelli Ward
Undid revision 691138545 by Calibrador - You keep reverting me though you have not stated why and have not responded in the talk page
18:3118:31, 11 November 2015diffhist−48
Tom Smith (Pennsylvania politician)
Why is this being changed? Every politicians article says they are a politician in the lead sentence and what party in the next. Its redundant to mention the party twice back to back sentences
23:1223:12, 5 November 2015diffhist−44
Charles Krauthammer
He said specifically he does not identify as atheist www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/12/23/i-dont-believe-in-god-but-i-fear-him-greatly-krauthammer-explains-his-thoughts-on-religion/
17:1417:14, 22 December 2015diffhist−92
Don Young
The lengthy portions dedicated to controversies is actually a problem, giving undue and unneeded weight. I kept the fact he has faced federal investigation but this part is not warranted or needed
16 December 2015
03:5103:51, 16 December 2015diffhist−92
Don Young
You cannot state in the lead that unless he is universally considered a controversial person, info about investigation was kept. If you're going to revert, please state why
08:1008:10, 14 December 2015diffhist+93
Kelli Ward
Please stop reverting with vague reasons; you refuse to discuss anything on the talk page and simply revert. If you're going to cite wiki policies, please read up on them
03:0003:00, 14 December 2015diffhist+93
Kelli Ward
If you're going to revert me, say why in the talk page; these one word/ vague reasons are not good wikipedia practice
13:4413:44, 13 December 2015diffhist+93
Kelli Ward
You were reverting me without giving any valid reason - usually telling me "Do not remove updated information" under false premise when I haven't removed any. Headlines are needed to break up different info
23:4123:41, 2 December 2015diffhist+1,337
Kelli Ward
Undid revision 693462138 by
Calibrador (
talk) - I did not remove any information, you did. Please discuss on talk page before breaking the three revert ruleTag: Non-autoconfirmed user rapidly reverting edits
18:3418:34, 2 December 2015diffhist+1,125
Kelli Ward
You keep reverting pertinent sourced information without a single reason. Your support of Senator Ward is appreciated, but cannot get in the way of wikipedia's high standards
00:1700:17, 18 November 2015diffhist+924
Kelli Ward
Undid revision 691138545 by Calibrador - You keep reverting me though you have not stated why and have not responded in the talk page
18:3118:31, 11 November 2015diffhist−48
Tom Smith (Pennsylvania politician)
Why is this being changed? Every politicians article says they are a politician in the lead sentence and what party in the next. Its redundant to mention the party twice back to back sentences
23:1223:12, 5 November 2015diffhist−44
Charles Krauthammer
He said specifically he does not identify as atheist www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/12/23/i-dont-believe-in-god-but-i-fear-him-greatly-krauthammer-explains-his-thoughts-on-religion/