20:0720:07, 28 April 2023diffhist+29
Type 80/88 main battle tank
labeled a dead link. (I am not kin to replace the link for another re-published one. Ultimately, the article is an editorial in a enthusiast type of website and not by an authoritative source.)
19:5819:58, 28 April 2023diffhist+140
Type 80/88 main battle tank
Updated dead link to a different website re-publishing the same article. Original website was mentioned in the article (though somewhat hidden). The ultimate reference given within the article is that the original is from magazine 《兵工科技》
01:5001:50, 21 February 2023diffhist+326
Bella ciao
→Covers: added reference to HOI4 cover. (Note that the link points to an official announcement video about the cover. Obviously, for the cover itself, we are not posting copyright-dubious link here.)
04:4604:46, 30 May 2021diffhist+248
Iraqi invasion of Kuwait
Whose ass was this statement pulled out of? The current reference is a secondary source that mentions a 110 kill count without further reference, and makes a sketchy comparison to Vietnam War casualty in proportion. Where is "most of ... executed were civilians"?!Tags: nowiki addedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
04:3404:34, 30 May 2021diffhist+476
Iraqi invasion of Kuwait
Described what the wikileak Glaspie cable provide. The cable itself does not support any of the preceding passages directly. Hence removed that citation. Also provided another view of the interaction in the form of an FP article. Those interested can trace that article and its contexts and expand on the discussion on US role in (failure in) deterring Iraqi aggression.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
01:1601:16, 30 May 2021diffhist−17
Iraqi invasion of Kuwait
→Aftermath: The previous writing pretended there is 1st hand report and a greater scale based what is an uncited encyclopedia webpage. AWEFUL practice. I rewrote the sentence assuming the source deserves full credibility in the absence of replacements. I hope future editors take a more ethical approach.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
00:3200:32, 26 April 2021diffhist−8
Soviet–Afghan War
→Rape: I don't know which unethical idiot wrote the line earlier -- conflating "heard" with "confirmed" and swapped killing not excluding women/children with targeting women/children
06:4406:44, 3 February 2020diffhist+118
Luigi Durand de la Penne
→Sinking of Valiant: DO NOT make notes in the form of citation. Simply edit the article (as can be done in this case.) At most, use footnote. One cannot emphasize this enough. Confusing footnote with citation is AWFUL practice.
20:0720:07, 28 April 2023diffhist+29
Type 80/88 main battle tank
labeled a dead link. (I am not kin to replace the link for another re-published one. Ultimately, the article is an editorial in a enthusiast type of website and not by an authoritative source.)
19:5819:58, 28 April 2023diffhist+140
Type 80/88 main battle tank
Updated dead link to a different website re-publishing the same article. Original website was mentioned in the article (though somewhat hidden). The ultimate reference given within the article is that the original is from magazine 《兵工科技》
01:5001:50, 21 February 2023diffhist+326
Bella ciao
→Covers: added reference to HOI4 cover. (Note that the link points to an official announcement video about the cover. Obviously, for the cover itself, we are not posting copyright-dubious link here.)
04:4604:46, 30 May 2021diffhist+248
Iraqi invasion of Kuwait
Whose ass was this statement pulled out of? The current reference is a secondary source that mentions a 110 kill count without further reference, and makes a sketchy comparison to Vietnam War casualty in proportion. Where is "most of ... executed were civilians"?!Tags: nowiki addedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
04:3404:34, 30 May 2021diffhist+476
Iraqi invasion of Kuwait
Described what the wikileak Glaspie cable provide. The cable itself does not support any of the preceding passages directly. Hence removed that citation. Also provided another view of the interaction in the form of an FP article. Those interested can trace that article and its contexts and expand on the discussion on US role in (failure in) deterring Iraqi aggression.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
01:1601:16, 30 May 2021diffhist−17
Iraqi invasion of Kuwait
→Aftermath: The previous writing pretended there is 1st hand report and a greater scale based what is an uncited encyclopedia webpage. AWEFUL practice. I rewrote the sentence assuming the source deserves full credibility in the absence of replacements. I hope future editors take a more ethical approach.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
00:3200:32, 26 April 2021diffhist−8
Soviet–Afghan War
→Rape: I don't know which unethical idiot wrote the line earlier -- conflating "heard" with "confirmed" and swapped killing not excluding women/children with targeting women/children
06:4406:44, 3 February 2020diffhist+118
Luigi Durand de la Penne
→Sinking of Valiant: DO NOT make notes in the form of citation. Simply edit the article (as can be done in this case.) At most, use footnote. One cannot emphasize this enough. Confusing footnote with citation is AWFUL practice.