19:4619:46, 29 July 2024diffhist+462
Joseph Kallarangatt
Content removed citing “Rmv POV language, original research” in this diff [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Joseph_Kallarangatt&diff=prev&oldid=1237399766] is reinstated with relevant citations. See this article's talk page for elaborationcurrentTags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
16:4716:47, 29 July 2024diffhist+1,130
Joseph Kallarangatt
Undid revision
1237402716 by
Pbritti (
talk) your argument citing dates has been refute in this article's talk page. O have already warned to discuss in article's talk before action in this[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Joseph_Kallarangatt&action=history] diff.Tags: UndoMobile editMobile web edit
16:3216:32, 29 July 2024diffhist+1,130
Joseph Kallarangatt
→2021 Love and narcotics jihad controversy: Undid revision
1237399280 by
Pbritti (
talk) presence of criticism of such person is like including opinion of a murderer on the matters regarding subjects the murder killed or the the police who nabbed the murder. Explicitly violates [WP:NPOV] when presented him as "within the Church". Discuss in the Talk Page before action regarding it. Treating the official stan...Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
15:4415:44, 29 July 2024diffhist−810
Joseph Kallarangatt
→2021 Love and narcotics jihad controversy: This priest who is under bail is facing criminal charges on case filed by this Church regarding document forgery case against then Cardinal. So it is evident how biased he would be against the official stand of the Church. As per [WP:NPOV] on living persons, removing his references form here. See this article s talk page.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
23:0723:07, 26 July 2024diffhist+208
2024 Harehills riot
Lead section made concise with relevant details. The rest moved to the background section as previously with the census report tightened to one line. Any outright removal of Background section warrants consensus from this article's talk page as it doesn't violate any of the core principles of Wikipedia.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
19:5719:57, 26 July 2024diffhist+2,002
2024 Harehills riot
Contents lost in between the edits 1236816839, 1236818672(restoration) and 1236818754 reinstated as they are even quoted as background in reliable news sources.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
16:3616:36, 26 July 2024diffhist−902
Heliocentrism
→Ancient India: Highly disputed claim regarding Heliocentrism in Vedas. Reliability of sources are questionable(second source is outrightly unreliable). Removed as per this article's talk page and see the wider discussion under the deletion discussion mentioned in the talk page.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
22:5622:56, 25 July 2024diffhist−1,009
Shatapatha Brahmana
→Mathematics: See this article's talk page under the section heading named == Statement presented as Pearce, F. Staal, & D.M. Knipe endorsing Kak == for the reasons of its removal. In brief Pearce is directly quoting Kak without independently verifying Kak's works''(see talk for his disclaimer)'', cannot suffice for Kak's far fetched claims. Staal and Knipe doesn't quote Kak directly hence it falls under WP:NOR. See the section heading for further.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
19:4619:46, 29 July 2024diffhist+462
Joseph Kallarangatt
Content removed citing “Rmv POV language, original research” in this diff [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Joseph_Kallarangatt&diff=prev&oldid=1237399766] is reinstated with relevant citations. See this article's talk page for elaborationcurrentTags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
16:4716:47, 29 July 2024diffhist+1,130
Joseph Kallarangatt
Undid revision
1237402716 by
Pbritti (
talk) your argument citing dates has been refute in this article's talk page. O have already warned to discuss in article's talk before action in this[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Joseph_Kallarangatt&action=history] diff.Tags: UndoMobile editMobile web edit
16:3216:32, 29 July 2024diffhist+1,130
Joseph Kallarangatt
→2021 Love and narcotics jihad controversy: Undid revision
1237399280 by
Pbritti (
talk) presence of criticism of such person is like including opinion of a murderer on the matters regarding subjects the murder killed or the the police who nabbed the murder. Explicitly violates [WP:NPOV] when presented him as "within the Church". Discuss in the Talk Page before action regarding it. Treating the official stan...Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
15:4415:44, 29 July 2024diffhist−810
Joseph Kallarangatt
→2021 Love and narcotics jihad controversy: This priest who is under bail is facing criminal charges on case filed by this Church regarding document forgery case against then Cardinal. So it is evident how biased he would be against the official stand of the Church. As per [WP:NPOV] on living persons, removing his references form here. See this article s talk page.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
23:0723:07, 26 July 2024diffhist+208
2024 Harehills riot
Lead section made concise with relevant details. The rest moved to the background section as previously with the census report tightened to one line. Any outright removal of Background section warrants consensus from this article's talk page as it doesn't violate any of the core principles of Wikipedia.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
19:5719:57, 26 July 2024diffhist+2,002
2024 Harehills riot
Contents lost in between the edits 1236816839, 1236818672(restoration) and 1236818754 reinstated as they are even quoted as background in reliable news sources.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
16:3616:36, 26 July 2024diffhist−902
Heliocentrism
→Ancient India: Highly disputed claim regarding Heliocentrism in Vedas. Reliability of sources are questionable(second source is outrightly unreliable). Removed as per this article's talk page and see the wider discussion under the deletion discussion mentioned in the talk page.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
22:5622:56, 25 July 2024diffhist−1,009
Shatapatha Brahmana
→Mathematics: See this article's talk page under the section heading named == Statement presented as Pearce, F. Staal, & D.M. Knipe endorsing Kak == for the reasons of its removal. In brief Pearce is directly quoting Kak without independently verifying Kak's works''(see talk for his disclaimer)'', cannot suffice for Kak's far fetched claims. Staal and Knipe doesn't quote Kak directly hence it falls under WP:NOR. See the section heading for further.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit