05:1205:12, 12 July 2020diffhist−321
Proto-Indo-European homeland
Repeatedly mentioned in many sections and parts of the article, no need to be written in every case against all of other theories. Please do not neglect these clear informative edit summaries or you will be reportedTags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
05:0805:08, 12 July 2020diffhist−321
Proto-Indo-European homeland
As I mentioned in my last edit to this section and clearly ignored by user, the first phrase is not informative and not necessary (also the writer is a known one, the quote does not provide any useful info.) The second part of the quote redacted for undermining rules of impartial words and tone. Please do not reinstate the unrelated biased phrases and words. Validity urges correct and unbiased approach and literature.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
04:5004:50, 12 July 2020diffhist−420
Proto-Indo-European homeland
Kristiensen has revisions about Steppe Hypothesis and has regards a prior Caucasian Phase as Proto-proto-indo-european language and culture to it. So he had abandoned his precedent views substantially.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
04:2104:21, 12 July 2020diffhist−112
Proto-Indo-European homeland
Other theories has same claims about interpretations of both linguistic and genetic findings. Violation of impartial and neutral point of view by putting unnecessary weight in the scale by obvious claims in the shape of quotes.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
03:5303:53, 12 July 2020diffhist−420
Proto-Indo-European homeland
The Copenhagen School's new substantiative revision _towards Iranian (or Near East or Armenian) urhaimat _ and against Steppe Hypothesis has not been included oddly, Moreover the abandoned point of view by them has been mentioned, how on earth...?Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
05:1205:12, 12 July 2020diffhist−321
Proto-Indo-European homeland
Repeatedly mentioned in many sections and parts of the article, no need to be written in every case against all of other theories. Please do not neglect these clear informative edit summaries or you will be reportedTags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
05:0805:08, 12 July 2020diffhist−321
Proto-Indo-European homeland
As I mentioned in my last edit to this section and clearly ignored by user, the first phrase is not informative and not necessary (also the writer is a known one, the quote does not provide any useful info.) The second part of the quote redacted for undermining rules of impartial words and tone. Please do not reinstate the unrelated biased phrases and words. Validity urges correct and unbiased approach and literature.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
04:5004:50, 12 July 2020diffhist−420
Proto-Indo-European homeland
Kristiensen has revisions about Steppe Hypothesis and has regards a prior Caucasian Phase as Proto-proto-indo-european language and culture to it. So he had abandoned his precedent views substantially.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
04:2104:21, 12 July 2020diffhist−112
Proto-Indo-European homeland
Other theories has same claims about interpretations of both linguistic and genetic findings. Violation of impartial and neutral point of view by putting unnecessary weight in the scale by obvious claims in the shape of quotes.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
03:5303:53, 12 July 2020diffhist−420
Proto-Indo-European homeland
The Copenhagen School's new substantiative revision _towards Iranian (or Near East or Armenian) urhaimat _ and against Steppe Hypothesis has not been included oddly, Moreover the abandoned point of view by them has been mentioned, how on earth...?Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit