Differences between versions

ItemVersion from 18:44, 5 September 2009 by HersfoldVersion from 21:41, 22 October 2009 by Prodego
Basic information
Flags:
Enabled
 
Notes:
Users creating very short articles
Users creating very short articles


A size of 200 was more or less chosen at random, it make sense to adjust it higher or lower to better fit user behavior.
A size of 200 was more or less chosen at random, it make sense to adjust it higher or lower to better fit user behavior.


Apparently one can create correct disambigs in less than 200 characters...
Apparently one can create correct disambigs in less than 200 characters...
Added {{softredirect}}. - Ruslik
Added {{softredirect}}. - Ruslik


Added {{db-unpatrolled}}, see bugzilla #18114 - Stifle
Added {{db-unpatrolled}}, see bugzilla #18114 - Stifle


Stubs aren't necessarily bad. I think the warning ("make your article longer") needs to be changed, we don't want to discourage good edits. -Prodego
Stubs aren't necessarily bad. I think the warning ("make your article longer") needs to be changed, we don't want to discourage good edits. -Prodego


Disabled for sysops. - KoH
Disabled for sysops. - KoH


I limited this filter to non-autoconfirmed users and decreased the size limit to 150. - Ruslik
I limited this filter to non-autoconfirmed users and decreased the size limit to 150. - Ruslik


add tag "very short new article" - Cen
add tag "very short new article" - Cen


I rearranged conditions. - Ruslik
I rearranged conditions. - Ruslik
As did I, hopefully this will improve runtime. - Hersfold
As did I, hopefully this will improve runtime. - Hersfold
Nope, that made it markedly worse. - Hersfold
Nope, that made it markedly worse. - Hersfold
Try this instead... - Hersfold
Try this instead... - Hersfold
There is nothing wrong with a short article, lets not patronize. People can work in steps. Disable - P

Differences between versions

ItemVersion from 18:44, 5 September 2009 by HersfoldVersion from 21:41, 22 October 2009 by Prodego
Basic information
Flags:
Enabled
 
Notes:
Users creating very short articles
Users creating very short articles


A size of 200 was more or less chosen at random, it make sense to adjust it higher or lower to better fit user behavior.
A size of 200 was more or less chosen at random, it make sense to adjust it higher or lower to better fit user behavior.


Apparently one can create correct disambigs in less than 200 characters...
Apparently one can create correct disambigs in less than 200 characters...
Added {{softredirect}}. - Ruslik
Added {{softredirect}}. - Ruslik


Added {{db-unpatrolled}}, see bugzilla #18114 - Stifle
Added {{db-unpatrolled}}, see bugzilla #18114 - Stifle


Stubs aren't necessarily bad. I think the warning ("make your article longer") needs to be changed, we don't want to discourage good edits. -Prodego
Stubs aren't necessarily bad. I think the warning ("make your article longer") needs to be changed, we don't want to discourage good edits. -Prodego


Disabled for sysops. - KoH
Disabled for sysops. - KoH


I limited this filter to non-autoconfirmed users and decreased the size limit to 150. - Ruslik
I limited this filter to non-autoconfirmed users and decreased the size limit to 150. - Ruslik


add tag "very short new article" - Cen
add tag "very short new article" - Cen


I rearranged conditions. - Ruslik
I rearranged conditions. - Ruslik
As did I, hopefully this will improve runtime. - Hersfold
As did I, hopefully this will improve runtime. - Hersfold
Nope, that made it markedly worse. - Hersfold
Nope, that made it markedly worse. - Hersfold
Try this instead... - Hersfold
Try this instead... - Hersfold
There is nothing wrong with a short article, lets not patronize. People can work in steps. Disable - P

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook