SPECIAL:ABUSEFILTER HISTORY 1297 ITEM 31876

You are viewing an old version of this filter. The statistics quoted are for the most recent version of the filter. • Return to this filter's history.

Filter parameters

Filter ID:	1,297
Description: (publicly viewable)
Statistics:	Of the last 210,752 actions, this filter has matched 160 (0.08%). On average, its run time is 1.05 ms, and it consumes 1.8 conditions of the condition limit.
Conditions: ( documentation)	sus := "(?x)\b(?: fortnite \|ass+ \|poo+ \|fart(?:ed\|ing\|s)? \|suck(?:ed\|ing\|s)? \|cool \|gay \|fat \|balls \|daddy \|i[ ]like \|sexy? \|racist )\b"; page_namespace == 0 & !("confirmed" in user_groups) & added_lines irlike sus & !(removed_lines irlike sus) & ( /* Baseline AGF / score := 1.0; / More AGF on "sweary" pages / score := score + 0.2 rcount("(?i)" + sus, old_wikitext); /* Added references / ref_cnt := (count("<ref", added_lines) - count("<ref", removed_lines)); clamped_ref_cnt := ref_cnt < -1 ? -1 : ref_cnt; score := score + 2.0 ref_cnt; /* Added markup / markup_cnt := (rcount("[[\]{}\|]", added_lines)) - (rcount("[[\]{}\|]", removed_lines)); clamped_markup_cnt := markup_cnt < -10 ? -10 : markup_cnt; score := score + 0.1 clamped_markup_cnt; /* Added quotes or italics / quote_cnt := (rcount("(?<!')''(?!')\|\"", added_lines)) - rcount("(?<!')''(?!')\|\"", removed_lines); clamped_quote_cnt := quote_cnt < 0 ? 0 : quote_cnt; score := score + 0.5 clamped_quote_cnt; /* No summary / score := score - 0.5 (summary irlike "^(?:/\.?\/)?\s$"); /* Did they add these words and do nothing else except adjust whitespace and punctuation? / score := score - 2.0 (norm(str_replace_regexp(added_lines, sus, "")) == norm(removed_lines)); /* Multiple bad words / extra_cnt := rcount("(?i)" + sus, added_lines); clamped_extra_cnt := extra_cnt > 10 ? 10 : extra_cnt; score := score - 0.5 clamped_extra_cnt; /* Back-to-back bad words / tandem_cnt := rcount("(?i)(?:(?:" + sus + ")\W){2}", added_lines); clamped_tandem_cnt := tandem_cnt > 10 ? 10 : tandem_cnt; score := score - 2.0 * tandem_cnt; /* Large additions are probably more helpful / clamped_edit_delta := edit_delta < -1000 ? -1000 : edit_delta > 1000 ? 1000 : edit_delta; score := score + 0.001 clamped_edit_delta; /* On the other hand, if the word count is exactly the same, that probably means they just swapped out one word, or did a search-and-replace / score := score - 1.0 (rcount("\w+", added_lines) == rcount("\w+", removed_lines)); /* Anying in all caps, not necessarily these words / score := score - 1.0 (rcount("[A-Z]{4,}", added_lines) > rcount("[A-Z]{4,}", removed_lines)); /* Added plain text to the end of a single line / score := score - 1.0 ( strpos(norm(added_lines), norm(removed_lines)) == 0 & length(added_lines) == length(removed_lines) & quote_cnt + ref_cnt + markup_cnt == 0 ); score < 0 ) sus := "(?x)\b(?: fortnite \|ass+ \|poo+ \|fart(?:ed\|ing\|s)? \|suck(?:ed\|ing\|s)? \|cool \|gay \|fat \|balls \|daddy \|i[ ]like \|sexy? \|racist )\b"; page_namespace == 0 & !("confirmed" in user_groups) & added_lines irlike sus & !(removed_lines irlike sus) & ( /* Baseline AGF / score := 1.0; / More AGF on "sweary" pages / score := score + 0.2 rcount("(?i)" + sus, old_wikitext); /* Added references / ref_cnt := (count("<ref", added_lines) - count("<ref", removed_lines)); clamped_ref_cnt := ref_cnt < -1 ? -1 : ref_cnt; score := score + 2.0 ref_cnt; /* Added markup / markup_cnt := (rcount("[[\]{}\|]", added_lines)) - (rcount("[[\]{}\|]", removed_lines)); clamped_markup_cnt := markup_cnt < -10 ? -10 : markup_cnt; score := score + 0.1 clamped_markup_cnt; /* Added quotes or italics / quote_cnt := (rcount("(?<!')''(?!')\|\"", added_lines)) - rcount("(?<!')''(?!')\|\"", removed_lines); clamped_quote_cnt := quote_cnt < 0 ? 0 : quote_cnt; score := score + 0.5 clamped_quote_cnt; /* No summary / score := score - 0.5 (summary irlike "^(?:/\.?\/)?\s$"); /* Did they add these words and do nothing else except adjust whitespace and punctuation? / score := score - 2.0 (norm(str_replace_regexp(added_lines, sus, "")) == norm(removed_lines)); /* Multiple bad words / extra_cnt := rcount("(?i)" + sus, added_lines); clamped_extra_cnt := extra_cnt > 10 ? 10 : extra_cnt; score := score - 0.5 clamped_extra_cnt; /* Back-to-back bad words / tandem_cnt := rcount("(?i)(?:(?:" + sus + ")\W){2}", added_lines); clamped_tandem_cnt := tandem_cnt > 10 ? 10 : tandem_cnt; score := score - 2.0 * tandem_cnt; /* Large additions are probably more helpful / clamped_edit_delta := edit_delta < -1000 ? -1000 : edit_delta > 1000 ? 1000 : edit_delta; score := score + 0.001 clamped_edit_delta; /* On the other hand, if the word count is exactly the same, that probably means they just swapped out one word, or did a search-and-replace / score := score - 1.0 (rcount("\w+", added_lines) == rcount("\w+", removed_lines)); /* Anying in all caps, not necessarily these words / score := score - 1.0 (rcount("[A-Z]{4,}", added_lines) > rcount("[A-Z]{4,}", removed_lines)); /* Added plain text to the end of a single line / score := score - 1.0 ( strpos(norm(added_lines), norm(removed_lines)) == 0 & length(added_lines) == length(removed_lines) & quote_cnt + ref_cnt + markup_cnt == 0 ); score < 0 )
Notes:	Same word list as 1296. Words with too many legitimate uses to disallow outright. Instead, there must be some other clues of vandalism. Of course, this will take a huge amount of refinement. Therefore ALWAYS keep the word list in sync with 1296; otherwise it will be impossible to check if any change will cause FPs! --Suffusion of Yellow 23:16 4 Apr 2024
Flags:	Hide details of this filter from public view Enable this filter I understand that details of this filter will be hidden from users who cannot see [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:AbuseFilter/Rules_format#Protected_variables protected variables] Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:	17:31, 5 April 2024 by Suffusion of Yellow ( talk \| contribs)
History:	View this filter's history
Tools:	Export this filter to another wiki {"data":{"rules":"sus := \"(?x)\\b(?:\r\n fortnite\r\n \|ass+\r\n \|poo+\r\n \|fart(?:ed\|ing\|s)?\r\n \|suck(?:ed\|ing\|s)?\r\n \|cool\r\n \|gay\r\n \|fat\r\n \|balls\r\n \|daddy\r\n \|i[ ]like\r\n \|sexy?\r\n \|racist\r\n)\\b\";\r\n\r\npage_namespace == 0 \u0026\r\n!(\"confirmed\" in user_groups) \u0026\r\nadded_lines irlike sus \u0026\r\n!(removed_lines irlike sus) \u0026\r\n(\r\n /* Baseline AGF /\r\n score := 1.0;\r\n\r\n / More AGF on \"sweary\" pages /\r\n score := score + 0.2 rcount(\"(?i)\" + sus, old_wikitext);\r\n\r\n /* Added references /\r\n ref_cnt := (count(\"\u003Cref\", added_lines) - count(\"\u003Cref\", removed_lines));\r\n clamped_ref_cnt := ref_cnt \u003C -1 ? -1 : ref_cnt;\r\n score := score + 2.0 ref_cnt;\r\n\r\n /* Added markup /\r\n markup_cnt := (rcount(\"[[\\]{}\|]\", added_lines)) - (rcount(\"[[\\]{}\|]\", removed_lines));\r\n clamped_markup_cnt := markup_cnt \u003C -10 ? -10 : markup_cnt;\r\n score := score + 0.1 clamped_markup_cnt;\r\n\r\n /* Added quotes or italics /\r\n quote_cnt := (rcount(\"(?\u003C!')''(?!')\|\\\"\", added_lines)) - rcount(\"(?\u003C!')''(?!')\|\\\"\", removed_lines);\r\n clamped_quote_cnt := quote_cnt \u003C 0 ? 0 : quote_cnt;\r\n score := score + 0.5 clamped_quote_cnt;\r\n\r\n /* No summary /\r\n score := score - 0.5 (summary irlike \"^(?:/\\.?\\/)?\\s$\");\r\n\r\n /* Did they add these words and do nothing else except adjust whitespace and punctuation? /\r\n score := score - 2.0 (norm(str_replace_regexp(added_lines, sus, \"\")) == norm(removed_lines));\r\n\r\n /* Multiple bad words /\r\n extra_cnt := rcount(\"(?i)\" + sus, added_lines);\r\n clamped_extra_cnt := extra_cnt \u003E 10 ? 10 : extra_cnt;\r\n score := score - 0.5 clamped_extra_cnt;\r\n \r\n /* Back-to-back bad words /\r\n tandem_cnt := rcount(\"(?i)(?:(?:\" + sus + \")\\W){2}\", added_lines);\r\n clamped_tandem_cnt := tandem_cnt \u003E 10 ? 10 : tandem_cnt;\r\n score := score - 2.0 * tandem_cnt;\r\n\r\n /* Large additions are probably more helpful /\r\n clamped_edit_delta := edit_delta \u003C -1000 ? -1000 : edit_delta \u003E 1000 ? 1000 : edit_delta;\r\n score := score + 0.001 clamped_edit_delta;\r\n\r\n /* On the other hand, if the word count is exactly the same, that probably means they just swapped out one word, or did a search-and-replace /\r\n score := score - 1.0 (rcount(\"\\w+\", added_lines) == rcount(\"\\w+\", removed_lines));\r\n\r\n /* Anying in all caps, not necessarily these words /\r\n score := score - 1.0 (rcount(\"[A-Z]{4,}\", added_lines) \u003E rcount(\"[A-Z]{4,}\", removed_lines));\r\n\r\n /* Added plain text to the end of a single line /\r\n score := score - 1.0 (\r\n strpos(norm(added_lines), norm(removed_lines)) == 0 \u0026\r\n length(added_lines) == length(removed_lines) \u0026\r\n quote_cnt + ref_cnt + markup_cnt == 0\r\n );\r\n\r\n score \u003C 0\r\n)","name":"Mixed-use words","comments":"Same word list as 1296. Words with too many legitimate uses to disallow outright. Instead, there must be some other clues of vandalism.\r\n\r\nOf course, this will take a huge amount of refinement. Therefore ALWAYS keep the word list in sync with 1296; otherwise it will be impossible to check if any change will cause FPs! --Suffusion of Yellow 23:16 4 Apr 2024","group":"default","actions":[],"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"privacylevel":0,"global":false},"actions":[]}

Actions to take when matched

Trigger actions only if the user trips a rate limit

Number of actions to allow:

Period of time (in seconds):

Group throttle by:

user

See the documentation on mediawiki.org.

Trigger these actions after giving the user a warning

System message to use for warning:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Prevent the user from performing the action in question

System message to use for disallowing:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Revoke the user's autoconfirmed status

Tag the edit in contributions lists and page histories

Tags to apply:

(see Wikipedia:Tags for use and formatting)

(please don't rename a tag here, see link above)

(one per line, no commas, publicly visible)

You are viewing an old version of this filter. The statistics quoted are for the most recent version of the filter. • Return to this filter's history.

Retrieved from " /info/en/?search=Special:AbuseFilter/history/1297/item/31876"

You are viewing an old version of this filter. The statistics quoted are for the most recent version of the filter. • Return to this filter's history.

Filter parameters

Filter ID:	1,297
Description: (publicly viewable)
Statistics:	Of the last 210,752 actions, this filter has matched 160 (0.08%). On average, its run time is 1.05 ms, and it consumes 1.8 conditions of the condition limit.
Conditions: ( documentation)	sus := "(?x)\b(?: fortnite \|ass+ \|poo+ \|fart(?:ed\|ing\|s)? \|suck(?:ed\|ing\|s)? \|cool \|gay \|fat \|balls \|daddy \|i[ ]like \|sexy? \|racist )\b"; page_namespace == 0 & !("confirmed" in user_groups) & added_lines irlike sus & !(removed_lines irlike sus) & ( /* Baseline AGF / score := 1.0; / More AGF on "sweary" pages / score := score + 0.2 rcount("(?i)" + sus, old_wikitext); /* Added references / ref_cnt := (count("<ref", added_lines) - count("<ref", removed_lines)); clamped_ref_cnt := ref_cnt < -1 ? -1 : ref_cnt; score := score + 2.0 ref_cnt; /* Added markup / markup_cnt := (rcount("[[\]{}\|]", added_lines)) - (rcount("[[\]{}\|]", removed_lines)); clamped_markup_cnt := markup_cnt < -10 ? -10 : markup_cnt; score := score + 0.1 clamped_markup_cnt; /* Added quotes or italics / quote_cnt := (rcount("(?<!')''(?!')\|\"", added_lines)) - rcount("(?<!')''(?!')\|\"", removed_lines); clamped_quote_cnt := quote_cnt < 0 ? 0 : quote_cnt; score := score + 0.5 clamped_quote_cnt; /* No summary / score := score - 0.5 (summary irlike "^(?:/\.?\/)?\s$"); /* Did they add these words and do nothing else except adjust whitespace and punctuation? / score := score - 2.0 (norm(str_replace_regexp(added_lines, sus, "")) == norm(removed_lines)); /* Multiple bad words / extra_cnt := rcount("(?i)" + sus, added_lines); clamped_extra_cnt := extra_cnt > 10 ? 10 : extra_cnt; score := score - 0.5 clamped_extra_cnt; /* Back-to-back bad words / tandem_cnt := rcount("(?i)(?:(?:" + sus + ")\W){2}", added_lines); clamped_tandem_cnt := tandem_cnt > 10 ? 10 : tandem_cnt; score := score - 2.0 * tandem_cnt; /* Large additions are probably more helpful / clamped_edit_delta := edit_delta < -1000 ? -1000 : edit_delta > 1000 ? 1000 : edit_delta; score := score + 0.001 clamped_edit_delta; /* On the other hand, if the word count is exactly the same, that probably means they just swapped out one word, or did a search-and-replace / score := score - 1.0 (rcount("\w+", added_lines) == rcount("\w+", removed_lines)); /* Anying in all caps, not necessarily these words / score := score - 1.0 (rcount("[A-Z]{4,}", added_lines) > rcount("[A-Z]{4,}", removed_lines)); /* Added plain text to the end of a single line / score := score - 1.0 ( strpos(norm(added_lines), norm(removed_lines)) == 0 & length(added_lines) == length(removed_lines) & quote_cnt + ref_cnt + markup_cnt == 0 ); score < 0 ) sus := "(?x)\b(?: fortnite \|ass+ \|poo+ \|fart(?:ed\|ing\|s)? \|suck(?:ed\|ing\|s)? \|cool \|gay \|fat \|balls \|daddy \|i[ ]like \|sexy? \|racist )\b"; page_namespace == 0 & !("confirmed" in user_groups) & added_lines irlike sus & !(removed_lines irlike sus) & ( /* Baseline AGF / score := 1.0; / More AGF on "sweary" pages / score := score + 0.2 rcount("(?i)" + sus, old_wikitext); /* Added references / ref_cnt := (count("<ref", added_lines) - count("<ref", removed_lines)); clamped_ref_cnt := ref_cnt < -1 ? -1 : ref_cnt; score := score + 2.0 ref_cnt; /* Added markup / markup_cnt := (rcount("[[\]{}\|]", added_lines)) - (rcount("[[\]{}\|]", removed_lines)); clamped_markup_cnt := markup_cnt < -10 ? -10 : markup_cnt; score := score + 0.1 clamped_markup_cnt; /* Added quotes or italics / quote_cnt := (rcount("(?<!')''(?!')\|\"", added_lines)) - rcount("(?<!')''(?!')\|\"", removed_lines); clamped_quote_cnt := quote_cnt < 0 ? 0 : quote_cnt; score := score + 0.5 clamped_quote_cnt; /* No summary / score := score - 0.5 (summary irlike "^(?:/\.?\/)?\s$"); /* Did they add these words and do nothing else except adjust whitespace and punctuation? / score := score - 2.0 (norm(str_replace_regexp(added_lines, sus, "")) == norm(removed_lines)); /* Multiple bad words / extra_cnt := rcount("(?i)" + sus, added_lines); clamped_extra_cnt := extra_cnt > 10 ? 10 : extra_cnt; score := score - 0.5 clamped_extra_cnt; /* Back-to-back bad words / tandem_cnt := rcount("(?i)(?:(?:" + sus + ")\W){2}", added_lines); clamped_tandem_cnt := tandem_cnt > 10 ? 10 : tandem_cnt; score := score - 2.0 * tandem_cnt; /* Large additions are probably more helpful / clamped_edit_delta := edit_delta < -1000 ? -1000 : edit_delta > 1000 ? 1000 : edit_delta; score := score + 0.001 clamped_edit_delta; /* On the other hand, if the word count is exactly the same, that probably means they just swapped out one word, or did a search-and-replace / score := score - 1.0 (rcount("\w+", added_lines) == rcount("\w+", removed_lines)); /* Anying in all caps, not necessarily these words / score := score - 1.0 (rcount("[A-Z]{4,}", added_lines) > rcount("[A-Z]{4,}", removed_lines)); /* Added plain text to the end of a single line / score := score - 1.0 ( strpos(norm(added_lines), norm(removed_lines)) == 0 & length(added_lines) == length(removed_lines) & quote_cnt + ref_cnt + markup_cnt == 0 ); score < 0 )
Notes:	Same word list as 1296. Words with too many legitimate uses to disallow outright. Instead, there must be some other clues of vandalism. Of course, this will take a huge amount of refinement. Therefore ALWAYS keep the word list in sync with 1296; otherwise it will be impossible to check if any change will cause FPs! --Suffusion of Yellow 23:16 4 Apr 2024
Flags:	Hide details of this filter from public view Enable this filter I understand that details of this filter will be hidden from users who cannot see [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:AbuseFilter/Rules_format#Protected_variables protected variables] Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:	17:31, 5 April 2024 by Suffusion of Yellow ( talk \| contribs)
History:	View this filter's history
Tools:	Export this filter to another wiki {"data":{"rules":"sus := \"(?x)\\b(?:\r\n fortnite\r\n \|ass+\r\n \|poo+\r\n \|fart(?:ed\|ing\|s)?\r\n \|suck(?:ed\|ing\|s)?\r\n \|cool\r\n \|gay\r\n \|fat\r\n \|balls\r\n \|daddy\r\n \|i[ ]like\r\n \|sexy?\r\n \|racist\r\n)\\b\";\r\n\r\npage_namespace == 0 \u0026\r\n!(\"confirmed\" in user_groups) \u0026\r\nadded_lines irlike sus \u0026\r\n!(removed_lines irlike sus) \u0026\r\n(\r\n /* Baseline AGF /\r\n score := 1.0;\r\n\r\n / More AGF on \"sweary\" pages /\r\n score := score + 0.2 rcount(\"(?i)\" + sus, old_wikitext);\r\n\r\n /* Added references /\r\n ref_cnt := (count(\"\u003Cref\", added_lines) - count(\"\u003Cref\", removed_lines));\r\n clamped_ref_cnt := ref_cnt \u003C -1 ? -1 : ref_cnt;\r\n score := score + 2.0 ref_cnt;\r\n\r\n /* Added markup /\r\n markup_cnt := (rcount(\"[[\\]{}\|]\", added_lines)) - (rcount(\"[[\\]{}\|]\", removed_lines));\r\n clamped_markup_cnt := markup_cnt \u003C -10 ? -10 : markup_cnt;\r\n score := score + 0.1 clamped_markup_cnt;\r\n\r\n /* Added quotes or italics /\r\n quote_cnt := (rcount(\"(?\u003C!')''(?!')\|\\\"\", added_lines)) - rcount(\"(?\u003C!')''(?!')\|\\\"\", removed_lines);\r\n clamped_quote_cnt := quote_cnt \u003C 0 ? 0 : quote_cnt;\r\n score := score + 0.5 clamped_quote_cnt;\r\n\r\n /* No summary /\r\n score := score - 0.5 (summary irlike \"^(?:/\\.?\\/)?\\s$\");\r\n\r\n /* Did they add these words and do nothing else except adjust whitespace and punctuation? /\r\n score := score - 2.0 (norm(str_replace_regexp(added_lines, sus, \"\")) == norm(removed_lines));\r\n\r\n /* Multiple bad words /\r\n extra_cnt := rcount(\"(?i)\" + sus, added_lines);\r\n clamped_extra_cnt := extra_cnt \u003E 10 ? 10 : extra_cnt;\r\n score := score - 0.5 clamped_extra_cnt;\r\n \r\n /* Back-to-back bad words /\r\n tandem_cnt := rcount(\"(?i)(?:(?:\" + sus + \")\\W){2}\", added_lines);\r\n clamped_tandem_cnt := tandem_cnt \u003E 10 ? 10 : tandem_cnt;\r\n score := score - 2.0 * tandem_cnt;\r\n\r\n /* Large additions are probably more helpful /\r\n clamped_edit_delta := edit_delta \u003C -1000 ? -1000 : edit_delta \u003E 1000 ? 1000 : edit_delta;\r\n score := score + 0.001 clamped_edit_delta;\r\n\r\n /* On the other hand, if the word count is exactly the same, that probably means they just swapped out one word, or did a search-and-replace /\r\n score := score - 1.0 (rcount(\"\\w+\", added_lines) == rcount(\"\\w+\", removed_lines));\r\n\r\n /* Anying in all caps, not necessarily these words /\r\n score := score - 1.0 (rcount(\"[A-Z]{4,}\", added_lines) \u003E rcount(\"[A-Z]{4,}\", removed_lines));\r\n\r\n /* Added plain text to the end of a single line /\r\n score := score - 1.0 (\r\n strpos(norm(added_lines), norm(removed_lines)) == 0 \u0026\r\n length(added_lines) == length(removed_lines) \u0026\r\n quote_cnt + ref_cnt + markup_cnt == 0\r\n );\r\n\r\n score \u003C 0\r\n)","name":"Mixed-use words","comments":"Same word list as 1296. Words with too many legitimate uses to disallow outright. Instead, there must be some other clues of vandalism.\r\n\r\nOf course, this will take a huge amount of refinement. Therefore ALWAYS keep the word list in sync with 1296; otherwise it will be impossible to check if any change will cause FPs! --Suffusion of Yellow 23:16 4 Apr 2024","group":"default","actions":[],"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"privacylevel":0,"global":false},"actions":[]}

Actions to take when matched

Trigger actions only if the user trips a rate limit

Number of actions to allow:

Period of time (in seconds):

Group throttle by:

user

See the documentation on mediawiki.org.

Trigger these actions after giving the user a warning

System message to use for warning:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Prevent the user from performing the action in question

System message to use for disallowing:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Revoke the user's autoconfirmed status

Tag the edit in contributions lists and page histories

Tags to apply:

(see Wikipedia:Tags for use and formatting)

(please don't rename a tag here, see link above)

(one per line, no commas, publicly visible)

You are viewing an old version of this filter. The statistics quoted are for the most recent version of the filter. • Return to this filter's history.

Retrieved from " /info/en/?search=Special:AbuseFilter/history/1297/item/31876"

Videos

Websites

Encyclopedia

Facebook