In mathematics, physics and engineering, the sinc function, denoted by sinc(x), has two forms, normalized and unnormalized. [1]
Sinc | |
---|---|
General information | |
General definition | |
Motivation of invention | Telecommunication |
Date of solution | 1952 |
Fields of application | Signal processing, spectroscopy |
Domain, codomain and image | |
Domain | |
Image | |
Basic features | |
Parity | Even |
Specific values | |
At zero | 1 |
Value at +∞ | 0 |
Value at −∞ | 0 |
Maxima | 1 at |
Minima | at |
Specific features | |
Root | |
Related functions | |
Reciprocal | |
Derivative | |
Antiderivative | |
Series definition | |
Taylor series |
In mathematics, the historical unnormalized sinc function is defined for x ≠ 0 by
Alternatively, the unnormalized sinc function is often called the sampling function, indicated as Sa(x). [2]
In digital signal processing and information theory, the normalized sinc function is commonly defined for x ≠ 0 by
In either case, the value at x = 0 is defined to be the limiting value
The normalization causes the definite integral of the function over the real numbers to equal 1 (whereas the same integral of the unnormalized sinc function has a value of π). As a further useful property, the zeros of the normalized sinc function are the nonzero integer values of x.
The normalized sinc function is the Fourier transform of the rectangular function with no scaling. It is used in the concept of reconstructing a continuous bandlimited signal from uniformly spaced samples of that signal.
The only difference between the two definitions is in the scaling of the independent variable (the x axis) by a factor of π. In both cases, the value of the function at the removable singularity at zero is understood to be the limit value 1. The sinc function is then analytic everywhere and hence an entire function.
The function has also been called the cardinal sine or sine cardinal function. [3] [4] The term sinc /ˈsɪŋk/ was introduced by Philip M. Woodward in his 1952 article "Information theory and inverse probability in telecommunication", in which he said that the function "occurs so often in Fourier analysis and its applications that it does seem to merit some notation of its own", [5] and his 1953 book Probability and Information Theory, with Applications to Radar. [6] [7] The function itself was first mathematically derived in this form by Lord Rayleigh in his expression ( Rayleigh's formula) for the zeroth-order spherical Bessel function of the first kind.
The zero crossings of the unnormalized sinc are at non-zero integer multiples of π, while zero crossings of the normalized sinc occur at non-zero integers.
The local maxima and minima of the unnormalized sinc correspond to its intersections with the cosine function. That is, sin(ξ)/ξ = cos(ξ) for all points ξ where the derivative of sin(x)/x is zero and thus a local extremum is reached. This follows from the derivative of the sinc function:
The first few terms of the infinite series for the x coordinate of the n-th extremum with positive x coordinate are
The normalized sinc function has a simple representation as the infinite product:
and is related to the gamma function Γ(x) through Euler's reflection formula:
The continuous Fourier transform of the normalized sinc (to ordinary frequency) is rect(f):
This Fourier integral, including the special case
The normalized sinc function has properties that make it ideal in relationship to interpolation of sampled bandlimited functions:
Other properties of the two sinc functions include:
The normalized sinc function can be used as a nascent delta function, meaning that the following weak limit holds:
This is not an ordinary limit, since the left side does not converge. Rather, it means that
for every Schwartz function, as can be seen from the Fourier inversion theorem. In the above expression, as a → 0, the number of oscillations per unit length of the sinc function approaches infinity. Nevertheless, the expression always oscillates inside an envelope of ±1/πx, regardless of the value of a.
This complicates the informal picture of δ(x) as being zero for all x except at the point x = 0, and illustrates the problem of thinking of the delta function as a function rather than as a distribution. A similar situation is found in the Gibbs phenomenon.
All sums in this section refer to the unnormalized sinc function.
The sum of sinc(n) over integer n from 1 to ∞ equals π − 1/2:
The sum of the squares also equals π − 1/2: [10] [11]
When the signs of the addends alternate and begin with +, the sum equals 1/2:
The alternating sums of the squares and cubes also equal 1/2: [12]
The Taylor series of the unnormalized sinc function can be obtained from that of the sine (which also yields its value of 1 at x = 0):
The series converges for all x. The normalized version follows easily:
Euler famously compared this series to the expansion of the infinite product form to solve the Basel problem.
The product of 1-D sinc functions readily provides a multivariate sinc function for the square Cartesian grid ( lattice): sincC(x, y) = sinc(x) sinc(y), whose Fourier transform is the indicator function of a square in the frequency space (i.e., the brick wall defined in 2-D space). The sinc function for a non-Cartesian lattice (e.g., hexagonal lattice) is a function whose Fourier transform is the indicator function of the Brillouin zone of that lattice. For example, the sinc function for the hexagonal lattice is a function whose Fourier transform is the indicator function of the unit hexagon in the frequency space. For a non-Cartesian lattice this function can not be obtained by a simple tensor product. However, the explicit formula for the sinc function for the hexagonal, body-centered cubic, face-centered cubic and other higher-dimensional lattices can be explicitly derived [13] using the geometric properties of Brillouin zones and their connection to zonotopes.
For example, a hexagonal lattice can be generated by the (integer) linear span of the vectors
Denoting
This construction can be used to design Lanczos window for general multidimensional lattices. [13]
In mathematics, physics and engineering, the sinc function, denoted by sinc(x), has two forms, normalized and unnormalized. [1]
Sinc | |
---|---|
General information | |
General definition | |
Motivation of invention | Telecommunication |
Date of solution | 1952 |
Fields of application | Signal processing, spectroscopy |
Domain, codomain and image | |
Domain | |
Image | |
Basic features | |
Parity | Even |
Specific values | |
At zero | 1 |
Value at +∞ | 0 |
Value at −∞ | 0 |
Maxima | 1 at |
Minima | at |
Specific features | |
Root | |
Related functions | |
Reciprocal | |
Derivative | |
Antiderivative | |
Series definition | |
Taylor series |
In mathematics, the historical unnormalized sinc function is defined for x ≠ 0 by
Alternatively, the unnormalized sinc function is often called the sampling function, indicated as Sa(x). [2]
In digital signal processing and information theory, the normalized sinc function is commonly defined for x ≠ 0 by
In either case, the value at x = 0 is defined to be the limiting value
The normalization causes the definite integral of the function over the real numbers to equal 1 (whereas the same integral of the unnormalized sinc function has a value of π). As a further useful property, the zeros of the normalized sinc function are the nonzero integer values of x.
The normalized sinc function is the Fourier transform of the rectangular function with no scaling. It is used in the concept of reconstructing a continuous bandlimited signal from uniformly spaced samples of that signal.
The only difference between the two definitions is in the scaling of the independent variable (the x axis) by a factor of π. In both cases, the value of the function at the removable singularity at zero is understood to be the limit value 1. The sinc function is then analytic everywhere and hence an entire function.
The function has also been called the cardinal sine or sine cardinal function. [3] [4] The term sinc /ˈsɪŋk/ was introduced by Philip M. Woodward in his 1952 article "Information theory and inverse probability in telecommunication", in which he said that the function "occurs so often in Fourier analysis and its applications that it does seem to merit some notation of its own", [5] and his 1953 book Probability and Information Theory, with Applications to Radar. [6] [7] The function itself was first mathematically derived in this form by Lord Rayleigh in his expression ( Rayleigh's formula) for the zeroth-order spherical Bessel function of the first kind.
The zero crossings of the unnormalized sinc are at non-zero integer multiples of π, while zero crossings of the normalized sinc occur at non-zero integers.
The local maxima and minima of the unnormalized sinc correspond to its intersections with the cosine function. That is, sin(ξ)/ξ = cos(ξ) for all points ξ where the derivative of sin(x)/x is zero and thus a local extremum is reached. This follows from the derivative of the sinc function:
The first few terms of the infinite series for the x coordinate of the n-th extremum with positive x coordinate are
The normalized sinc function has a simple representation as the infinite product:
and is related to the gamma function Γ(x) through Euler's reflection formula:
The continuous Fourier transform of the normalized sinc (to ordinary frequency) is rect(f):
This Fourier integral, including the special case
The normalized sinc function has properties that make it ideal in relationship to interpolation of sampled bandlimited functions:
Other properties of the two sinc functions include:
The normalized sinc function can be used as a nascent delta function, meaning that the following weak limit holds:
This is not an ordinary limit, since the left side does not converge. Rather, it means that
for every Schwartz function, as can be seen from the Fourier inversion theorem. In the above expression, as a → 0, the number of oscillations per unit length of the sinc function approaches infinity. Nevertheless, the expression always oscillates inside an envelope of ±1/πx, regardless of the value of a.
This complicates the informal picture of δ(x) as being zero for all x except at the point x = 0, and illustrates the problem of thinking of the delta function as a function rather than as a distribution. A similar situation is found in the Gibbs phenomenon.
All sums in this section refer to the unnormalized sinc function.
The sum of sinc(n) over integer n from 1 to ∞ equals π − 1/2:
The sum of the squares also equals π − 1/2: [10] [11]
When the signs of the addends alternate and begin with +, the sum equals 1/2:
The alternating sums of the squares and cubes also equal 1/2: [12]
The Taylor series of the unnormalized sinc function can be obtained from that of the sine (which also yields its value of 1 at x = 0):
The series converges for all x. The normalized version follows easily:
Euler famously compared this series to the expansion of the infinite product form to solve the Basel problem.
The product of 1-D sinc functions readily provides a multivariate sinc function for the square Cartesian grid ( lattice): sincC(x, y) = sinc(x) sinc(y), whose Fourier transform is the indicator function of a square in the frequency space (i.e., the brick wall defined in 2-D space). The sinc function for a non-Cartesian lattice (e.g., hexagonal lattice) is a function whose Fourier transform is the indicator function of the Brillouin zone of that lattice. For example, the sinc function for the hexagonal lattice is a function whose Fourier transform is the indicator function of the unit hexagon in the frequency space. For a non-Cartesian lattice this function can not be obtained by a simple tensor product. However, the explicit formula for the sinc function for the hexagonal, body-centered cubic, face-centered cubic and other higher-dimensional lattices can be explicitly derived [13] using the geometric properties of Brillouin zones and their connection to zonotopes.
For example, a hexagonal lattice can be generated by the (integer) linear span of the vectors
Denoting
This construction can be used to design Lanczos window for general multidimensional lattices. [13]