The Second Hunnic War commenced with
Mihirakula's ascension to power in West
Punjab around 515 AD, succeeding his father,
Toramana. Initially,
Mihirakula's authority seemed lesser compared to his father's, as indicated by numismatic evidence. In 520,
Song Yun encountered the "King of the
Huns" along the
Jhelum River, where the
Northern Wei envoy depicted him as having a violent demeanor and being responsible for massacres, resulting in an unpleasant meeting.
Mihirakula consolidated his control in
India by emulating his father's initial campaign, as implied by an inscription found in a temple of the Sun at
Gwalior, between the
Chambal and
Betwa rivers. The inscription suggests that the Sun Temple at Surāj Kund might have been a
Hun temple, possibly housing a garrison. Mātrceta, rumored to be associated with King
Mihirakula, could have been a beneficiary of the foundation's success, indicating ties between the Hunnic and
Iranian cultures.
It is proposed that the garrison might have included individuals of
Iranian descent, with a temple catering to their religious needs by combining
Indian and
Iranian sun gods,
Surya (Bhanu) and
Mithra, respectively. This religious syncretism is reminiscent of
Roman legionary stations, which often contained Mithraea.
Mihirakula's domain extended from
Gwalior Hill in eastern
Malwa to
Sialkot in northern
Punjab, forming a corridor bordered by the
Aulikara kingdom of
Yashodharman to the southwest and the territory of the
Maukharis to the northeast, who had previously seized parts of the
Ganga-
Yamuna Plain. This territorial expanse facilitated
Mihirakula's strategic position in the region.
The Second Hunnic War
Mihirkula the Huna
The Second Hunnic War began when
Mihirakula, the son of
Toramana, established his position in West
Punjab shortly after taking over as leader of his father shortly after 515.
Based on numismatic evidence, it appears that
Mihirakula led a group of Alkhan chiefs and was not as powerful as his father.
Song Yun met the "King of the Huns" in 520, as we have seen above, on the banks of the
Jhelum River. The
Northern Wei envoy depicted the king (chiqin) as having a violent and harsh disposition and having perpetrated massacres. The meeting was unpleasant.[1]
Mihirakula tightened his hold in
India by going the same path his father had taken during the latter's initial campaign. This is inferred from the one known inscription of
Mihirakula, which was discovered "built into the wall in the porch of a temple of the Sun in the fortress of
Gwalior," between the
Chambal and
Betwa rivers. The Sun Temple at Surāj Kund, where the inscription was discovered, is no longer standing; it might have been the heir to the first Sun (
Surya) temple established by Mātrceta.[1]
One of the people who was rumoured to live there because of King
Mihirakula (prasadena) was Mātrceta. These individuals are identified as the heirs who will benefit from the foundation's success. Consequently, the recently established Sun Temple might have served as a
Hun temple, with a garrison inside the fort. A monarch named
Mihirakula, which means "Family of Mihira" and is of
Mitra, is a direct example of the Alkhan's
Iranian ties.[1]
According to
Hans T. Bakker It's possible that some of the garrison's members were of Iranian descent, and a temple that combined the sun gods of India's Surya (Bhanu) and Iran's Mithra catered to their religious needs.The Roman legionary stations contain Mithraea.[1]
It is clear that
Mihirakula ruled over a wide swath of territory that connected his stronghold of Gwalior Hill in eastern
Malwa to his home base of
Sialkot in northern
Punjab. This corridor shared borders with the Aulikara kingdom of
Yashodharman to the southwest and the
Maukharis' territory to the northeast, where they had previously taken over portions of the
Ganga-
Yamuna Plain.[1]
The Second Hunnic War started in 520, when the Alchon king
Mihirakula, son of Toramana, is recorded in his military encampment on the borders of the
Jhelum by Chinese monk
Song Yun. At the head of the Alchon, Mihirakula is then recorded in
Gwalior,
Central India as "Lord of the Earth" in the
Gwalior inscription of Mihirakula.[2] According to some accounts, Mihirakula invaded India as far as the Gupta capital
Pataliputra, which was sacked and left in ruins.[3][4]: 64
There was a king called Mo-hi-lo-kiu-lo (Mihirakula), who established his authority in this town (
Sagala) and ruled over India. He was of quick talent, and naturally brave. He subdued all the neighbouring provinces without exception.
—
Xuanzang "The Record of the Western Regions", 7th century CE[5]
The destructions of Mihirakula are also recorded in the
Rajatarangini:[6]
Mihirakula, a man of violent acts and resembling
Kāla (Death) ruled in the land which was overrun by hordes of
Mlecchas... the people knew his approach by noticing the vultures, crows, and other [birds], which were flying ahead to feed on those who were being slain within his army's [reach]
Finally however, Mihirakula was defeated in 528 by an alliance of Indian principalities led by
Yasodharman, the
Aulikara king of
Malwa, in the
Battle of Sondani in
Central India, which resulted in the loss of Alchon possessions in the Punjab and north India by 542. The
Sondani inscription in
Sondani, near
Mandsaur, records the submission by force of the Hunas, and claims that Yasodharman had rescued the earth from rude and cruel kings,[7][Note 1] and that he "had bent the head of Mihirakula".[2] In a part of the Sondani inscription
Yasodharman thus praises himself for having defeated king
Mihirakula:[8]
He (Yasodharman) to whose two feet respect was paid, with complimentary presents of the flowers from the lock of hair on the top of (his) head, by even that (famous) king
Mihirakula, whose forehead was pained through being bent low down by the strength of (his) arm in (the act of compelling) obeisance
The
Gupta Empire emperor
Narasimhagupta is also credited in helping repulse Mihirakula, after the latter had conquered most of India, according to the reports of Chinese monk
Xuanzang.[15][16] In a fanciful account, Xuanzang, who wrote a century later in 630 CE, reported that Mihirakula had conquered all India except for an island where the king of
Magadha named Baladitya (who could be Gupta ruler
Narasimhagupta Baladitya) took refuge, but that was finally captured by the Indian king. He later spared Mihirakula's life on the intercession of his mother, as she perceived the Hun ruler "as a man of remarkable beauty and vast wisdom".[16] Mihirakula is then said to have returned to
Kashmir to retake the throne.[17][18]: 168 This ended the Second Hunnic War in
c. 534, after an occupation which lasted nearly 15 years.[2]
"The son of that king (
Kumaragupta) was the illustrious
Dâmôdaragupta, by whom (his) enemies were slain, just like the demons by (the god)
Dâmôdara. Breaking up the proudly stepping array of mighty elephants, belonging to the Maukhari, which had thrown aloft in battle the troops of the Hûnas (in order to trample them to death), he became unconscious (and expired in the fight)."
This resulted in the loss of
Alchon possessions in the Punjab and
north India by 542. The
Sondani inscription in
Sondani, near
Mandsaur, records the submission by the
Hunas, and claims that Yasodharman had rescued the earth from rude and cruel kings,[7][Note 2] and that he "had bent the head of Mihirakula".[22] In a part of the Sondani inscription
Yasodharman thus praises himself for having defeated king
Mihirakula:[8]
He (Yasodharman) to whose two feet respect was paid, with complimentary presents of the flowers from the lock of hair on the top of (his) head, by even that (famous) king
Mihirakula, whose forehead was pained through being bent low down by the strength of (his) arm in (the act of compelling) obeisance
In a fanciful account,
Xuanzang, who wrote a century later in 630 CE, reported that Mihirakula had conquered all India except for an island where the king of
Magadha named Baladitya (who could be Gupta ruler
Narasimhagupta Baladitya) took refuge, but that was finally captured by the Indian king. He later spared Mihirakula's life on the intercession of his mother, as she perceived the Hun ruler "as a man of remarkable beauty and vast wisdom".[16] Mihirakula is then said to have returned to
Kashmir to retake the throne.[17][18]: 168
Victory pillar of Yashodharman at Sondani,
Mandsaur.
^"The earth betook itself (for succour), when it was afflicted by kings of the present age, who manifested pride; who were cruel through want of proper training; who,from delusion, transgressed the path of good conduct; (and) who were destitute of virtuous delights " from
"Sondhni pillars: where Punjabis met with their Waterloo 1500 years ago". Punjab Monitor. Amritsar: Bhai Nand Lal Foundation. 27 April 2013. Retrieved 8 July 2018.
^"The earth betook itself (for succour), when it was afflicted by kings of the present age, who manifested pride; who were cruel through want of proper training; who,from delusion, transgressed the path of good conduct; (and) who were destitute of virtuous delights " from
"Sondhni pillars: where Punjabis met with their Waterloo 1500 years ago". Punjab Monitor. Amritsar: Bhai Nand Lal Foundation. 27 April 2013. Retrieved 8 July 2018.
All of the royal families of these successor states including the
AlchonMihirakula had embraced
Saivism, which had equally profound effects.
Vaisnavism had been rendered obsolete by the fall of the Empire, particularly in its former lands. A theological innovation that specifically aided in this growth was Saivism's ability to provide access to both humdrum rewards and superformance power, in addition to this political component. This was accomplished by human agent lineages personifying god. This provided the
Śaiva officials with a unique advantage over their
Vaisnava counterparts. This is a unique factor, while Vaisnavism's diminished political standing following the collapse of the
Gupta Empire.
Saivism particularly gained traction in the regions of former
Gupta territories. Although
Vaisnavism flourished in the regions of
Kashmir and
Southern India.[25]
Vajra, who succeeded Baladitya II, did not surpass his predecessor's accomplishments. Despite his construction of an additional monastery at
Nalanda and his depiction as a devout
Buddhist by
Chinese sources, he proved incapable of resisting the formidable
Yaśodharman of
Malwa. However, the rapid expansion of
Malava power was soon curtailed, likely through the influence of emerging feudatory royal houses rather than direct
Gupta intervention.[27]
Evidence from the
Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh stone inscription suggests that either Isvaravarman or his successor, presumably Isanavarman, successfully repelled a threat originating from 'the city of
Dhar'. This conflict, occurring in the second quarter of the sixth century, likely corresponds to the invasion led by
Yasodharman. The
Maukhari kings played a significant role in opposing the
Malava adventurer, receiving support from these feudatories.[27]
Through alliances with such feudatories, Kumāragupta III, the son of Narasimhagupta II, and Vishnugupta Chandraditya, the son and successor of Kumāragupta III, were able to retain control of the imperial throne until the middle of the sixth century AD. These alliances were crucial for the
Gupta dynasty's survival amidst political instability and external threats.[27]
The
Gupta Empire faced significant challenges during
Yashodharman's conquests, as he expanded his victorious campaigns across
North India. Despite initial successes,
Yasodharman's ability to consolidate his conquests was limited, resulting in a short-lived reign reminiscent of a meteoric rise and fall. The circumstances surrounding his downfall remain unclear, but it is likely that the disintegration of the
Gupta Empire, triggered by his victories, contributed to his demise.[28]
The emergence of powers like the
Maukharis and
Later Guptas during this period suggests a shifting political landscape influenced by
Yashodharman's actions. It is possible that the
Gupta Emperor orchestrated
Yashodharman's defeat by rallying these forces against him. Alternatively,
Yashodharman may have succumbed to the chaos he instigated to dismantle the
Gupta Empire.[29]
Disintegration of the Gupta Empire
The
Gupta Empire, a beacon of stability and prosperity in ancient
India, faced a tumultuous period following the demise of
Budhagupta, its illustrious ruler. This era was characterized by internal discord, exacerbated by external threats, which precipitated the empire's gradual decline. Succession disputes emerged as a primary catalyst for the empire's instability, leading to fragmentation and partition. The absence of a clear line of succession plunged the
Gupta realm into uncertainty, opening the door to rival claimants vying for power.[30]
Among these contenders were Narasimhagupta,
Budhagupta's brother, and his successors. Narasimhagupta, known by the honorific title Baladitya, assumed the throne amidst a backdrop of political turmoil and uncertainty. However, his ascendancy was not without challenge, as other claimants, such as Vainyagupta and Bhanugupta, also sought to assert their authority. Vainyagupta's rule, centered in
Bengal, and Bhanugupta's reign, commemorated in an inscription at
Eran, added further complexity to the
Gupta political landscape. The inscription detailing
Bhanugupta's exploits suggests
Gupta efforts to resist external threats, particularly the incursions of
Huna chief
Toramana.[31]
Narasimhagupta's reign witnessed both triumph and tragedy. His notable victory over
Huna chief Mihirakula demonstrated
Gupta military prowess, yet internal discord continued to erode the empire's stability. As rival factions vied for supremacy, the
Gupta Empire entered a period of decline marked by territorial loss and political fragmentation. These tumultuous events marked a pivotal chapter in
Gupta history, signaling the empire's eventual demise and the end of an era of unparalleled prosperity and cultural flourishing in ancient
India.[32]
^The "h" () is an early variant of the Gupta script.
^The "h" () is an early variant of the Gupta script. Rev: Dotted border around Fire altar flanked by attendants, a design adopted from
Sasanian coinage.
The Second Hunnic War commenced with
Mihirakula's ascension to power in West
Punjab around 515 AD, succeeding his father,
Toramana. Initially,
Mihirakula's authority seemed lesser compared to his father's, as indicated by numismatic evidence. In 520,
Song Yun encountered the "King of the
Huns" along the
Jhelum River, where the
Northern Wei envoy depicted him as having a violent demeanor and being responsible for massacres, resulting in an unpleasant meeting.
Mihirakula consolidated his control in
India by emulating his father's initial campaign, as implied by an inscription found in a temple of the Sun at
Gwalior, between the
Chambal and
Betwa rivers. The inscription suggests that the Sun Temple at Surāj Kund might have been a
Hun temple, possibly housing a garrison. Mātrceta, rumored to be associated with King
Mihirakula, could have been a beneficiary of the foundation's success, indicating ties between the Hunnic and
Iranian cultures.
It is proposed that the garrison might have included individuals of
Iranian descent, with a temple catering to their religious needs by combining
Indian and
Iranian sun gods,
Surya (Bhanu) and
Mithra, respectively. This religious syncretism is reminiscent of
Roman legionary stations, which often contained Mithraea.
Mihirakula's domain extended from
Gwalior Hill in eastern
Malwa to
Sialkot in northern
Punjab, forming a corridor bordered by the
Aulikara kingdom of
Yashodharman to the southwest and the territory of the
Maukharis to the northeast, who had previously seized parts of the
Ganga-
Yamuna Plain. This territorial expanse facilitated
Mihirakula's strategic position in the region.
The Second Hunnic War
Mihirkula the Huna
The Second Hunnic War began when
Mihirakula, the son of
Toramana, established his position in West
Punjab shortly after taking over as leader of his father shortly after 515.
Based on numismatic evidence, it appears that
Mihirakula led a group of Alkhan chiefs and was not as powerful as his father.
Song Yun met the "King of the Huns" in 520, as we have seen above, on the banks of the
Jhelum River. The
Northern Wei envoy depicted the king (chiqin) as having a violent and harsh disposition and having perpetrated massacres. The meeting was unpleasant.[1]
Mihirakula tightened his hold in
India by going the same path his father had taken during the latter's initial campaign. This is inferred from the one known inscription of
Mihirakula, which was discovered "built into the wall in the porch of a temple of the Sun in the fortress of
Gwalior," between the
Chambal and
Betwa rivers. The Sun Temple at Surāj Kund, where the inscription was discovered, is no longer standing; it might have been the heir to the first Sun (
Surya) temple established by Mātrceta.[1]
One of the people who was rumoured to live there because of King
Mihirakula (prasadena) was Mātrceta. These individuals are identified as the heirs who will benefit from the foundation's success. Consequently, the recently established Sun Temple might have served as a
Hun temple, with a garrison inside the fort. A monarch named
Mihirakula, which means "Family of Mihira" and is of
Mitra, is a direct example of the Alkhan's
Iranian ties.[1]
According to
Hans T. Bakker It's possible that some of the garrison's members were of Iranian descent, and a temple that combined the sun gods of India's Surya (Bhanu) and Iran's Mithra catered to their religious needs.The Roman legionary stations contain Mithraea.[1]
It is clear that
Mihirakula ruled over a wide swath of territory that connected his stronghold of Gwalior Hill in eastern
Malwa to his home base of
Sialkot in northern
Punjab. This corridor shared borders with the Aulikara kingdom of
Yashodharman to the southwest and the
Maukharis' territory to the northeast, where they had previously taken over portions of the
Ganga-
Yamuna Plain.[1]
The Second Hunnic War started in 520, when the Alchon king
Mihirakula, son of Toramana, is recorded in his military encampment on the borders of the
Jhelum by Chinese monk
Song Yun. At the head of the Alchon, Mihirakula is then recorded in
Gwalior,
Central India as "Lord of the Earth" in the
Gwalior inscription of Mihirakula.[2] According to some accounts, Mihirakula invaded India as far as the Gupta capital
Pataliputra, which was sacked and left in ruins.[3][4]: 64
There was a king called Mo-hi-lo-kiu-lo (Mihirakula), who established his authority in this town (
Sagala) and ruled over India. He was of quick talent, and naturally brave. He subdued all the neighbouring provinces without exception.
—
Xuanzang "The Record of the Western Regions", 7th century CE[5]
The destructions of Mihirakula are also recorded in the
Rajatarangini:[6]
Mihirakula, a man of violent acts and resembling
Kāla (Death) ruled in the land which was overrun by hordes of
Mlecchas... the people knew his approach by noticing the vultures, crows, and other [birds], which were flying ahead to feed on those who were being slain within his army's [reach]
Finally however, Mihirakula was defeated in 528 by an alliance of Indian principalities led by
Yasodharman, the
Aulikara king of
Malwa, in the
Battle of Sondani in
Central India, which resulted in the loss of Alchon possessions in the Punjab and north India by 542. The
Sondani inscription in
Sondani, near
Mandsaur, records the submission by force of the Hunas, and claims that Yasodharman had rescued the earth from rude and cruel kings,[7][Note 1] and that he "had bent the head of Mihirakula".[2] In a part of the Sondani inscription
Yasodharman thus praises himself for having defeated king
Mihirakula:[8]
He (Yasodharman) to whose two feet respect was paid, with complimentary presents of the flowers from the lock of hair on the top of (his) head, by even that (famous) king
Mihirakula, whose forehead was pained through being bent low down by the strength of (his) arm in (the act of compelling) obeisance
The
Gupta Empire emperor
Narasimhagupta is also credited in helping repulse Mihirakula, after the latter had conquered most of India, according to the reports of Chinese monk
Xuanzang.[15][16] In a fanciful account, Xuanzang, who wrote a century later in 630 CE, reported that Mihirakula had conquered all India except for an island where the king of
Magadha named Baladitya (who could be Gupta ruler
Narasimhagupta Baladitya) took refuge, but that was finally captured by the Indian king. He later spared Mihirakula's life on the intercession of his mother, as she perceived the Hun ruler "as a man of remarkable beauty and vast wisdom".[16] Mihirakula is then said to have returned to
Kashmir to retake the throne.[17][18]: 168 This ended the Second Hunnic War in
c. 534, after an occupation which lasted nearly 15 years.[2]
"The son of that king (
Kumaragupta) was the illustrious
Dâmôdaragupta, by whom (his) enemies were slain, just like the demons by (the god)
Dâmôdara. Breaking up the proudly stepping array of mighty elephants, belonging to the Maukhari, which had thrown aloft in battle the troops of the Hûnas (in order to trample them to death), he became unconscious (and expired in the fight)."
This resulted in the loss of
Alchon possessions in the Punjab and
north India by 542. The
Sondani inscription in
Sondani, near
Mandsaur, records the submission by the
Hunas, and claims that Yasodharman had rescued the earth from rude and cruel kings,[7][Note 2] and that he "had bent the head of Mihirakula".[22] In a part of the Sondani inscription
Yasodharman thus praises himself for having defeated king
Mihirakula:[8]
He (Yasodharman) to whose two feet respect was paid, with complimentary presents of the flowers from the lock of hair on the top of (his) head, by even that (famous) king
Mihirakula, whose forehead was pained through being bent low down by the strength of (his) arm in (the act of compelling) obeisance
In a fanciful account,
Xuanzang, who wrote a century later in 630 CE, reported that Mihirakula had conquered all India except for an island where the king of
Magadha named Baladitya (who could be Gupta ruler
Narasimhagupta Baladitya) took refuge, but that was finally captured by the Indian king. He later spared Mihirakula's life on the intercession of his mother, as she perceived the Hun ruler "as a man of remarkable beauty and vast wisdom".[16] Mihirakula is then said to have returned to
Kashmir to retake the throne.[17][18]: 168
Victory pillar of Yashodharman at Sondani,
Mandsaur.
^"The earth betook itself (for succour), when it was afflicted by kings of the present age, who manifested pride; who were cruel through want of proper training; who,from delusion, transgressed the path of good conduct; (and) who were destitute of virtuous delights " from
"Sondhni pillars: where Punjabis met with their Waterloo 1500 years ago". Punjab Monitor. Amritsar: Bhai Nand Lal Foundation. 27 April 2013. Retrieved 8 July 2018.
^"The earth betook itself (for succour), when it was afflicted by kings of the present age, who manifested pride; who were cruel through want of proper training; who,from delusion, transgressed the path of good conduct; (and) who were destitute of virtuous delights " from
"Sondhni pillars: where Punjabis met with their Waterloo 1500 years ago". Punjab Monitor. Amritsar: Bhai Nand Lal Foundation. 27 April 2013. Retrieved 8 July 2018.
All of the royal families of these successor states including the
AlchonMihirakula had embraced
Saivism, which had equally profound effects.
Vaisnavism had been rendered obsolete by the fall of the Empire, particularly in its former lands. A theological innovation that specifically aided in this growth was Saivism's ability to provide access to both humdrum rewards and superformance power, in addition to this political component. This was accomplished by human agent lineages personifying god. This provided the
Śaiva officials with a unique advantage over their
Vaisnava counterparts. This is a unique factor, while Vaisnavism's diminished political standing following the collapse of the
Gupta Empire.
Saivism particularly gained traction in the regions of former
Gupta territories. Although
Vaisnavism flourished in the regions of
Kashmir and
Southern India.[25]
Vajra, who succeeded Baladitya II, did not surpass his predecessor's accomplishments. Despite his construction of an additional monastery at
Nalanda and his depiction as a devout
Buddhist by
Chinese sources, he proved incapable of resisting the formidable
Yaśodharman of
Malwa. However, the rapid expansion of
Malava power was soon curtailed, likely through the influence of emerging feudatory royal houses rather than direct
Gupta intervention.[27]
Evidence from the
Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh stone inscription suggests that either Isvaravarman or his successor, presumably Isanavarman, successfully repelled a threat originating from 'the city of
Dhar'. This conflict, occurring in the second quarter of the sixth century, likely corresponds to the invasion led by
Yasodharman. The
Maukhari kings played a significant role in opposing the
Malava adventurer, receiving support from these feudatories.[27]
Through alliances with such feudatories, Kumāragupta III, the son of Narasimhagupta II, and Vishnugupta Chandraditya, the son and successor of Kumāragupta III, were able to retain control of the imperial throne until the middle of the sixth century AD. These alliances were crucial for the
Gupta dynasty's survival amidst political instability and external threats.[27]
The
Gupta Empire faced significant challenges during
Yashodharman's conquests, as he expanded his victorious campaigns across
North India. Despite initial successes,
Yasodharman's ability to consolidate his conquests was limited, resulting in a short-lived reign reminiscent of a meteoric rise and fall. The circumstances surrounding his downfall remain unclear, but it is likely that the disintegration of the
Gupta Empire, triggered by his victories, contributed to his demise.[28]
The emergence of powers like the
Maukharis and
Later Guptas during this period suggests a shifting political landscape influenced by
Yashodharman's actions. It is possible that the
Gupta Emperor orchestrated
Yashodharman's defeat by rallying these forces against him. Alternatively,
Yashodharman may have succumbed to the chaos he instigated to dismantle the
Gupta Empire.[29]
Disintegration of the Gupta Empire
The
Gupta Empire, a beacon of stability and prosperity in ancient
India, faced a tumultuous period following the demise of
Budhagupta, its illustrious ruler. This era was characterized by internal discord, exacerbated by external threats, which precipitated the empire's gradual decline. Succession disputes emerged as a primary catalyst for the empire's instability, leading to fragmentation and partition. The absence of a clear line of succession plunged the
Gupta realm into uncertainty, opening the door to rival claimants vying for power.[30]
Among these contenders were Narasimhagupta,
Budhagupta's brother, and his successors. Narasimhagupta, known by the honorific title Baladitya, assumed the throne amidst a backdrop of political turmoil and uncertainty. However, his ascendancy was not without challenge, as other claimants, such as Vainyagupta and Bhanugupta, also sought to assert their authority. Vainyagupta's rule, centered in
Bengal, and Bhanugupta's reign, commemorated in an inscription at
Eran, added further complexity to the
Gupta political landscape. The inscription detailing
Bhanugupta's exploits suggests
Gupta efforts to resist external threats, particularly the incursions of
Huna chief
Toramana.[31]
Narasimhagupta's reign witnessed both triumph and tragedy. His notable victory over
Huna chief Mihirakula demonstrated
Gupta military prowess, yet internal discord continued to erode the empire's stability. As rival factions vied for supremacy, the
Gupta Empire entered a period of decline marked by territorial loss and political fragmentation. These tumultuous events marked a pivotal chapter in
Gupta history, signaling the empire's eventual demise and the end of an era of unparalleled prosperity and cultural flourishing in ancient
India.[32]
^The "h" () is an early variant of the Gupta script.
^The "h" () is an early variant of the Gupta script. Rev: Dotted border around Fire altar flanked by attendants, a design adopted from
Sasanian coinage.