From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Court Iowa Supreme Court
Full case nameJohn Salsbury, Appellee, v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, Appellant.
DecidedSeptember 18, 1974
DefendantNorthwestern Bell Telephone Co.
PlaintiffJohn Salsbury
Citation221 N.W.2d 609, 1974 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1120
Court membership
Judges sitting David Harris, Don LeGrand, W. W. Reynoldson
Case opinions
Decision by David Harris

Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 221 N.W.2d 609 (IA 1974), was a case decided by the Iowa Supreme Court concerning contract law.

Background

When John Salsbury was helping to establish Charles City College, Northwestern Bell agreed to make a $5,000 contribution for the next three years but only made one payment. The school sued for breach of contract but the telephone company maintained the contract was unenforceable because they received no consideration for the donations.

Decision

The court adopted the position of the Restatement of Contracts, Second that charitable subscriptions can be enforced even without consideration or detrimental reliance. [1]

References

  1. ^ Ayres, I. & Speidel R.E. Studies in Contract Law, Seventh Edition. Foundation Press, New York, NY: 2008, p. 141

External links

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Court Iowa Supreme Court
Full case nameJohn Salsbury, Appellee, v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, Appellant.
DecidedSeptember 18, 1974
DefendantNorthwestern Bell Telephone Co.
PlaintiffJohn Salsbury
Citation221 N.W.2d 609, 1974 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1120
Court membership
Judges sitting David Harris, Don LeGrand, W. W. Reynoldson
Case opinions
Decision by David Harris

Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 221 N.W.2d 609 (IA 1974), was a case decided by the Iowa Supreme Court concerning contract law.

Background

When John Salsbury was helping to establish Charles City College, Northwestern Bell agreed to make a $5,000 contribution for the next three years but only made one payment. The school sued for breach of contract but the telephone company maintained the contract was unenforceable because they received no consideration for the donations.

Decision

The court adopted the position of the Restatement of Contracts, Second that charitable subscriptions can be enforced even without consideration or detrimental reliance. [1]

References

  1. ^ Ayres, I. & Speidel R.E. Studies in Contract Law, Seventh Edition. Foundation Press, New York, NY: 2008, p. 141

External links


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook