Rise and Fall | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Studio album by | ||||
Released | 2001 | |||
Studio | Catasonic Studios, Los Angeles, CA | |||
Genre | ||||
Length | 58:22 | |||
Label | Bomp! [1] | |||
Producer | Rod Cervera | |||
The Warlocks chronology | ||||
|
Review scores | |
---|---|
Source | Rating |
AllMusic | [2] |
Stylus Magazine | B [3] |
Rise and Fall is the first album by American neo-psychedelic rock band the Warlocks. [4] [5] It was released by Bomp! Records in 2001.
The album has been compared to early Pink Floyd [2] and also to the work of the Velvet Underground and more recent space rock acts, such as Spacemen 3.[ citation needed]
The UK version of the album features a different track selection and ordering, modified to include tracks from the Warlocks' previous self-titled EP. The album's experimental structure, opening on the US version with a fourteen-minute instrumental and featuring a number of rough jams, would surprise and divide critics, both being remarked on as a highlight,[ citation needed] while also being panned as not translating well from live performance to the studio.[ citation needed]
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
Rise and Fall | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Studio album by | ||||
Released | 2001 | |||
Studio | Catasonic Studios, Los Angeles, CA | |||
Genre | ||||
Length | 58:22 | |||
Label | Bomp! [1] | |||
Producer | Rod Cervera | |||
The Warlocks chronology | ||||
|
Review scores | |
---|---|
Source | Rating |
AllMusic | [2] |
Stylus Magazine | B [3] |
Rise and Fall is the first album by American neo-psychedelic rock band the Warlocks. [4] [5] It was released by Bomp! Records in 2001.
The album has been compared to early Pink Floyd [2] and also to the work of the Velvet Underground and more recent space rock acts, such as Spacemen 3.[ citation needed]
The UK version of the album features a different track selection and ordering, modified to include tracks from the Warlocks' previous self-titled EP. The album's experimental structure, opening on the US version with a fourteen-minute instrumental and featuring a number of rough jams, would surprise and divide critics, both being remarked on as a highlight,[ citation needed] while also being panned as not translating well from live performance to the studio.[ citation needed]
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)