The quantum Fisher information is a central quantity in quantum metrology and is the quantum analogue of the classical Fisher information. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] It is one of the central quantities used to qualify the utility of an input state, especially in Mach–Zehnder (or, equivalently, Ramsey) interferometer-based phase or parameter estimation. [1] [3] [6] It is shown that the quantum Fisher information can also be a sensitive probe of a quantum phase transition (e.g. recognizing the superradiant quantum phase transition in the Dicke model [6]). The quantum Fisher information of a state with respect to the observable is defined as
where and are the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the density matrix respectively, and the summation goes over all and such that .
When the observable generates a unitary transformation of the system with a parameter from initial state ,
the quantum Fisher information constrains the achievable precision in statistical estimation of the parameter via the quantum Cramér–Rao bound as
where is the number of independent repetitions.
It is often desirable to estimate the magnitude of an unknown parameter that controls the strength of a system's Hamiltonian with respect to a known observable during a known dynamical time . In this case, defining , so that , means estimates of can be directly translated into estimates of .
Classical Fisher information of measuring observable on density matrix is defined as , where is the probability of obtaining outcome when measuring observable on the transformed density matrix . is the eigenvalue corresponding to eigenvector of observable .
Quantum Fisher information is the supremum of the classical Fisher information over all such observables, [7]
The quantum Fisher information equals the expectation value of , where is the symmetric logarithmic derivative
For a unitary encoding operation , the quantum Fisher information can be computed as an integral, [8]
where on the right hand side denotes commutator. It can be also expressed in terms of Kronecker product and vectorization, [9]
where denotes complex conjugate, and denotes conjugate transpose. This formula holds for invertible density matrices. For non-invertible density matrices, the inverse above is substituted by the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse. Alternatively, one can compute the quantum Fisher information for invertible state , where is any full-rank density matrix, and then perform the limit to obtain the quantum Fisher information for . Density matrix can be, for example, in a finite-dimensional system, or a thermal state in infinite dimensional systems.
For any differentiable parametrization of the density matrix by a vector of parameters , the quantum Fisher information matrix is defined as
where denotes partial derivative with respect to parameter . The formula also holds without taking the real part , because the imaginary part leads to an antisymmetric contribution that disappears under the sum. Note that all eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the density matrix potentially depend on the vector of parameters .
This definition is identical to four times the Bures metric, up to singular points where the rank of the density matrix changes (those are the points at which suddenly becomes zero.) Through this relation, it also connects with quantum fidelity of two infinitesimally close states, [10]
where the inner sum goes over all at which eigenvalues . The extra term (which is however zero in most applications) can be avoided by taking a symmetric expansion of fidelity, [11]
For and unitary encoding, the quantum Fisher information matrix reduces to the original definition.
Quantum Fisher information matrix is a part of a wider family of quantum statistical distances. [12]
Assuming that is a ground state of a parameter-dependent non-degenerate Hamiltonian , four times the quantum Fisher information of this state is called fidelity susceptibility, and denoted [13]
Fidelity susceptibility measures the sensitivity of the ground state to the parameter, and its divergence indicates a quantum phase transition. This is because of the aforementioned connection with fidelity: a diverging quantum Fisher information means that and are orthogonal to each other, for any infinitesimal change in parameter , and thus are said to undergo a phase-transition at point .
The quantum Fisher information equals four times the variance for pure states
For mixed states, when the probabilities are parameter independent, i.e., when , the quantum Fisher information is convex:
The quantum Fisher information is the largest function that is convex and that equals four times the variance for pure states. That is, it equals four times the convex roof of the variance [14] [15]
where the infimum is over all decompositions of the density matrix
Note that are not necessarily orthogonal to each other. The above optimization can be rewritten as an optimization over the two-copy space as [16]
such that is a symmetric separable state and
Later the above statement has been proved even for the case of a minimization over general (not necessarily symmetric) separable states. [17]
When the probabilities are -dependent, an extended-convexity relation has been proved: [18]
where is the classical Fisher information associated to the probabilities contributing to the convex decomposition. The first term, in the right hand side of the above inequality, can be considered as the average quantum Fisher information of the density matrices in the convex decomposition.
We need to understand the behavior of quantum Fisher information in composite system in order to study quantum metrology of many-particle systems. [19] For product states,
holds.
For the reduced state, we have
where .
There are strong links between quantum metrology and quantum information science. For a multiparticle system of spin-1/2 particles [20]
holds for separable states, where
and is a single particle angular momentum component. The maximum for general quantum states is given by
Hence, quantum entanglement is needed to reach the maximum precision in quantum metrology. Moreover, for quantum states with an entanglement depth ,
holds, where is the largest integer smaller than or equal to and is the remainder from dividing by . Hence, a higher and higher levels of multipartite entanglement is needed to achieve a better and better accuracy in parameter estimation. [21] [22] It is possible to obtain a weaker but simpler bound [23]
Hence, a lower bound on the entanglement depth is obtained as
The Wigner–Yanase skew information is defined as [24]
It follows that is convex in
For the quantum Fisher information and the Wigner–Yanase skew information, the inequality
holds, where there is an equality for pure states.
For any decomposition of the density matrix given by and the relation [14]
holds, where both inequalities are tight. That is, there is a decomposition for which the second inequality is saturated, which is the same as stating that the quantum Fisher information is the convex roof of the variance over four, discussed above. There is also a decomposition for which the first inequality is saturated, which means that the variance is its own concave roof [14]
Knowing that the quantum Fisher information is the convex roof of the variance times four, we obtain the relation [25] which is stronger than the Heisenberg uncertainty relation. For a particle of spin- the following uncertainty relation holds where are angular momentum components. The relation can be strengthened as [26] [27]
The quantum Fisher information is a central quantity in quantum metrology and is the quantum analogue of the classical Fisher information. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] It is one of the central quantities used to qualify the utility of an input state, especially in Mach–Zehnder (or, equivalently, Ramsey) interferometer-based phase or parameter estimation. [1] [3] [6] It is shown that the quantum Fisher information can also be a sensitive probe of a quantum phase transition (e.g. recognizing the superradiant quantum phase transition in the Dicke model [6]). The quantum Fisher information of a state with respect to the observable is defined as
where and are the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the density matrix respectively, and the summation goes over all and such that .
When the observable generates a unitary transformation of the system with a parameter from initial state ,
the quantum Fisher information constrains the achievable precision in statistical estimation of the parameter via the quantum Cramér–Rao bound as
where is the number of independent repetitions.
It is often desirable to estimate the magnitude of an unknown parameter that controls the strength of a system's Hamiltonian with respect to a known observable during a known dynamical time . In this case, defining , so that , means estimates of can be directly translated into estimates of .
Classical Fisher information of measuring observable on density matrix is defined as , where is the probability of obtaining outcome when measuring observable on the transformed density matrix . is the eigenvalue corresponding to eigenvector of observable .
Quantum Fisher information is the supremum of the classical Fisher information over all such observables, [7]
The quantum Fisher information equals the expectation value of , where is the symmetric logarithmic derivative
For a unitary encoding operation , the quantum Fisher information can be computed as an integral, [8]
where on the right hand side denotes commutator. It can be also expressed in terms of Kronecker product and vectorization, [9]
where denotes complex conjugate, and denotes conjugate transpose. This formula holds for invertible density matrices. For non-invertible density matrices, the inverse above is substituted by the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse. Alternatively, one can compute the quantum Fisher information for invertible state , where is any full-rank density matrix, and then perform the limit to obtain the quantum Fisher information for . Density matrix can be, for example, in a finite-dimensional system, or a thermal state in infinite dimensional systems.
For any differentiable parametrization of the density matrix by a vector of parameters , the quantum Fisher information matrix is defined as
where denotes partial derivative with respect to parameter . The formula also holds without taking the real part , because the imaginary part leads to an antisymmetric contribution that disappears under the sum. Note that all eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the density matrix potentially depend on the vector of parameters .
This definition is identical to four times the Bures metric, up to singular points where the rank of the density matrix changes (those are the points at which suddenly becomes zero.) Through this relation, it also connects with quantum fidelity of two infinitesimally close states, [10]
where the inner sum goes over all at which eigenvalues . The extra term (which is however zero in most applications) can be avoided by taking a symmetric expansion of fidelity, [11]
For and unitary encoding, the quantum Fisher information matrix reduces to the original definition.
Quantum Fisher information matrix is a part of a wider family of quantum statistical distances. [12]
Assuming that is a ground state of a parameter-dependent non-degenerate Hamiltonian , four times the quantum Fisher information of this state is called fidelity susceptibility, and denoted [13]
Fidelity susceptibility measures the sensitivity of the ground state to the parameter, and its divergence indicates a quantum phase transition. This is because of the aforementioned connection with fidelity: a diverging quantum Fisher information means that and are orthogonal to each other, for any infinitesimal change in parameter , and thus are said to undergo a phase-transition at point .
The quantum Fisher information equals four times the variance for pure states
For mixed states, when the probabilities are parameter independent, i.e., when , the quantum Fisher information is convex:
The quantum Fisher information is the largest function that is convex and that equals four times the variance for pure states. That is, it equals four times the convex roof of the variance [14] [15]
where the infimum is over all decompositions of the density matrix
Note that are not necessarily orthogonal to each other. The above optimization can be rewritten as an optimization over the two-copy space as [16]
such that is a symmetric separable state and
Later the above statement has been proved even for the case of a minimization over general (not necessarily symmetric) separable states. [17]
When the probabilities are -dependent, an extended-convexity relation has been proved: [18]
where is the classical Fisher information associated to the probabilities contributing to the convex decomposition. The first term, in the right hand side of the above inequality, can be considered as the average quantum Fisher information of the density matrices in the convex decomposition.
We need to understand the behavior of quantum Fisher information in composite system in order to study quantum metrology of many-particle systems. [19] For product states,
holds.
For the reduced state, we have
where .
There are strong links between quantum metrology and quantum information science. For a multiparticle system of spin-1/2 particles [20]
holds for separable states, where
and is a single particle angular momentum component. The maximum for general quantum states is given by
Hence, quantum entanglement is needed to reach the maximum precision in quantum metrology. Moreover, for quantum states with an entanglement depth ,
holds, where is the largest integer smaller than or equal to and is the remainder from dividing by . Hence, a higher and higher levels of multipartite entanglement is needed to achieve a better and better accuracy in parameter estimation. [21] [22] It is possible to obtain a weaker but simpler bound [23]
Hence, a lower bound on the entanglement depth is obtained as
The Wigner–Yanase skew information is defined as [24]
It follows that is convex in
For the quantum Fisher information and the Wigner–Yanase skew information, the inequality
holds, where there is an equality for pure states.
For any decomposition of the density matrix given by and the relation [14]
holds, where both inequalities are tight. That is, there is a decomposition for which the second inequality is saturated, which is the same as stating that the quantum Fisher information is the convex roof of the variance over four, discussed above. There is also a decomposition for which the first inequality is saturated, which means that the variance is its own concave roof [14]
Knowing that the quantum Fisher information is the convex roof of the variance times four, we obtain the relation [25] which is stronger than the Heisenberg uncertainty relation. For a particle of spin- the following uncertainty relation holds where are angular momentum components. The relation can be strengthened as [26] [27]