From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Protactinocerida
Temporal range: Upper Cambrian
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Mollusca
Class: Cephalopoda
Subclass: Nautiloidea
Superorder: Plectronoceratoidea
Order: Protactinocerida
Chen et al., 1979
Genera

Protactinoceridae

Protactinocerida is a proposed order of Late Cambrian nautiloid cephalopods. Their fossils have only been found in the Late Cambrian (late Jiangshanian to early Stage 10) of North China, a diversity pattern similar to other early cephalopod orders. [1] [2]

They were very similar to members of the order Plectronocerida in most respects. Like plectronocerids, their shells were compressed and slightly curved, containing numerous closely-spaced septa. The connecting rings have a calciosiphonate structure, while the siphuncle is divided by narrow partitions known as diaphragms. Protactinocerids were originally differentiated from plectronocerids based on their proportionally wider siphuncle. [2] For many proposed protactinocerid genera, this may be a misinterpretation of fossil cross-sections exposed along a shallower angle than in plectronocerid fossils. Nevertheless, a very broad siphuncle (more than half the width of the shell) does seem to be valid for Protactinoceras at least. [3] Another supposed distinguishing trait is the presence of calcite deposits between the diaphragms. [2] However, it is difficult to distinguish biological calcite deposition from later diagenetic infilling, so this trait is also dubious. [4] Some authors have suggested merging Protactinocerida into Plectronocerida in light of the uncertainty in differentiating the two orders. [4] [5]

References

  1. ^ Fang, Xiang; Kröger, Björn; Zhang, Yuan-Dong; Zhang, Yun-Bai; Chen, Ting-En (2019-03-01). "Palaeogeographic distribution and diversity of cephalopods during the Cambrian–Ordovician transition". Palaeoworld. Onset of the GOBE. 28 (1): 51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.palwor.2018.08.007. hdl: 10138/308817. ISSN  1871-174X. S2CID  134586179.
  2. ^ a b c Jun-Yuan, Chen; Teichert, Curt (1983). "Cambrian cephalopods". Geology. 11 (11): 647. Bibcode: 1983Geo....11..647J. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<647:CC>2.0.CO;2.
  3. ^ Mutvei, Harry (2020-04-02). "Restudy of some plectronocerid nautiloids (Cephalopoda) from the late Cambrian of China; discussion on nautiloid evolution and origin of the siphuncle" (PDF). GFF. 142 (2): 115–124. doi: 10.1080/11035897.2020.1739742. ISSN  1103-5897. S2CID  219047374.
  4. ^ a b Mutvei, H.; Zhang, Y.; Dunca, E. (2007). "Late Cambrian Plectronocerid Nautiloids and Their Role in Cephalopod Evolution". Palaeontology. 50 (6): 1327–1333. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00708.x.
  5. ^ Pohle A, Kröger B, Warnock RC, King AH, Evans DH, Aubrechtová M, et al. (April 2022). "Early cephalopod evolution clarified through Bayesian phylogenetic inference". BMC Biology. 20 (1): 88. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01284-5. PMC  9008929. PMID  35421982.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Protactinocerida
Temporal range: Upper Cambrian
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Mollusca
Class: Cephalopoda
Subclass: Nautiloidea
Superorder: Plectronoceratoidea
Order: Protactinocerida
Chen et al., 1979
Genera

Protactinoceridae

Protactinocerida is a proposed order of Late Cambrian nautiloid cephalopods. Their fossils have only been found in the Late Cambrian (late Jiangshanian to early Stage 10) of North China, a diversity pattern similar to other early cephalopod orders. [1] [2]

They were very similar to members of the order Plectronocerida in most respects. Like plectronocerids, their shells were compressed and slightly curved, containing numerous closely-spaced septa. The connecting rings have a calciosiphonate structure, while the siphuncle is divided by narrow partitions known as diaphragms. Protactinocerids were originally differentiated from plectronocerids based on their proportionally wider siphuncle. [2] For many proposed protactinocerid genera, this may be a misinterpretation of fossil cross-sections exposed along a shallower angle than in plectronocerid fossils. Nevertheless, a very broad siphuncle (more than half the width of the shell) does seem to be valid for Protactinoceras at least. [3] Another supposed distinguishing trait is the presence of calcite deposits between the diaphragms. [2] However, it is difficult to distinguish biological calcite deposition from later diagenetic infilling, so this trait is also dubious. [4] Some authors have suggested merging Protactinocerida into Plectronocerida in light of the uncertainty in differentiating the two orders. [4] [5]

References

  1. ^ Fang, Xiang; Kröger, Björn; Zhang, Yuan-Dong; Zhang, Yun-Bai; Chen, Ting-En (2019-03-01). "Palaeogeographic distribution and diversity of cephalopods during the Cambrian–Ordovician transition". Palaeoworld. Onset of the GOBE. 28 (1): 51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.palwor.2018.08.007. hdl: 10138/308817. ISSN  1871-174X. S2CID  134586179.
  2. ^ a b c Jun-Yuan, Chen; Teichert, Curt (1983). "Cambrian cephalopods". Geology. 11 (11): 647. Bibcode: 1983Geo....11..647J. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<647:CC>2.0.CO;2.
  3. ^ Mutvei, Harry (2020-04-02). "Restudy of some plectronocerid nautiloids (Cephalopoda) from the late Cambrian of China; discussion on nautiloid evolution and origin of the siphuncle" (PDF). GFF. 142 (2): 115–124. doi: 10.1080/11035897.2020.1739742. ISSN  1103-5897. S2CID  219047374.
  4. ^ a b Mutvei, H.; Zhang, Y.; Dunca, E. (2007). "Late Cambrian Plectronocerid Nautiloids and Their Role in Cephalopod Evolution". Palaeontology. 50 (6): 1327–1333. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00708.x.
  5. ^ Pohle A, Kröger B, Warnock RC, King AH, Evans DH, Aubrechtová M, et al. (April 2022). "Early cephalopod evolution clarified through Bayesian phylogenetic inference". BMC Biology. 20 (1): 88. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01284-5. PMC  9008929. PMID  35421982.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook