![]() | This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
portal about
Philosophy.
Content dispute discussions should take place on the appropriate article's talk page. For discussions about general portal development, please see the
WikiProject Portals talk page. If you are a regular maintainer of this portal, please add yourself to this list. |
|
![]() | This portal does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() List includes recommendations with replies/status.
Stevekim 1357 ( talk) 18:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC) would you add linguistic philosophy as branch of philosophy? and pragmatic philosophy? |
![]() | Automated portal content suggestions ( ) The following suggestions have been automatically generated as content that might be suitable for the portal, subject to review by a human editor. Please do not mindlessly copy items to the portal page without first checking that the suggestions are appropriate.
|
There is a discussion for the category: Abstraction that could do with your input. Brad7777 ( talk) 16:07, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Can someone add an ancient greek perspective to the evil article? Lbertolotti ( talk) 12:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject Portals is back!
The project was rebooted and completely overhauled on April 17th, 2018. Its goals are to revitalize the entire portal system, make building and maintaining portals easier, support the ongoing improvement of portals and the editors dedicated to this, and design the portals of the future.
As of May 2nd, 2018, membership is at 60 editors, and growing. You are welcome to join us.
There are design initiatives for revitalizing the portals system as a whole, and for improving each component of portals. So far, 2 new dynamic components have been developed: Template:Transclude lead excerpt and Template:Transclude random excerpt.
Tools are provided for building and maintaining portals, including automated portals that update themselves in various ways.
And, if you are bored and would like something to occupy your mind, we have a wonderful task list.
From your friendly neighborhood Portals WikiProject. Hope to see you there. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 07:41, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Commons says this photo "File:Langer.Susanne.foto 2.jpg" is being used on this portal. I cannot find it in the code of the portal. In fact it should be changed to this photo "File:Susanne Langer 1945.jpg" ~ R. T. G 11:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
The following GA-class articles are presently being displayed in the portal using transclusion from articles. Consensus at VPP has approved using transclusion templates in portals, which provides users with up-to-date content that is verbatim to that in articles. North America 1000 21:52, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
The following GA-class articles were added to the portal's Good article section today: Stoicism, Divine command theory, Buddhaghosa, Gary Varner, From Bakunin to Lacan. North America 1000 02:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Is this portal active? Editor2020 ( talk) 22:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello lovers of wisdom.
I think people here probably could assist in making the epistemological and ontological presuppositions of certain authors writing in this field more explicit to help those who aren't familiar with the topic get a basic grasp of it.
Kind regards,
Pauloroboto ( talk) 12:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I would like to share a vision for a real-time fact-checking resource: Wikifact. I hope that the project is of some interest to those who contribute to Wikipedia in this philosophy portal.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikifact
In the not-too-distant future, it may become possible for end-users to fact-check arbitrary portions of documents in word processors and Web browsers simply by selecting content, using context menus, and making use of crowdsourced, collaborative resources such as Wikifact. End-users would be able to select content from social media websites, news articles, digital textbooks, or arbitrary other documents and websites, and then open context menus providing options for exploring, e.g., fact-checking, the content.
I am hoping that more people will express interest on the project proposal’s website. I am hoping to publicize the project proposal. I am hoping to disseminate these ideas.
Please express your support for or opposition to the proposal on the project’s wiki page. We also welcome any of your comments, questions, or feedback with respect to the proposal, in particular ideas for improving it. Please feel free to share any of your ideas in our talk pages.
Thank you, AdamSobieski ( talk) 09:46, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi fellow Wikipedians, does anyone know why there are three pages essentially fulfilling the same purpose? I am talking about Portal:Philosophy, Wikipedia:Contents/Philosophy and thinking and Draft:Contents of philosophy. Can't we simply opt for one and delete the others? Infogiraffic ( talk) 15:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
portal about
Philosophy.
Content dispute discussions should take place on the appropriate article's talk page. For discussions about general portal development, please see the
WikiProject Portals talk page. If you are a regular maintainer of this portal, please add yourself to this list. |
|
![]() | This portal does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() List includes recommendations with replies/status.
Stevekim 1357 ( talk) 18:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC) would you add linguistic philosophy as branch of philosophy? and pragmatic philosophy? |
![]() | Automated portal content suggestions ( ) The following suggestions have been automatically generated as content that might be suitable for the portal, subject to review by a human editor. Please do not mindlessly copy items to the portal page without first checking that the suggestions are appropriate.
|
There is a discussion for the category: Abstraction that could do with your input. Brad7777 ( talk) 16:07, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Can someone add an ancient greek perspective to the evil article? Lbertolotti ( talk) 12:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject Portals is back!
The project was rebooted and completely overhauled on April 17th, 2018. Its goals are to revitalize the entire portal system, make building and maintaining portals easier, support the ongoing improvement of portals and the editors dedicated to this, and design the portals of the future.
As of May 2nd, 2018, membership is at 60 editors, and growing. You are welcome to join us.
There are design initiatives for revitalizing the portals system as a whole, and for improving each component of portals. So far, 2 new dynamic components have been developed: Template:Transclude lead excerpt and Template:Transclude random excerpt.
Tools are provided for building and maintaining portals, including automated portals that update themselves in various ways.
And, if you are bored and would like something to occupy your mind, we have a wonderful task list.
From your friendly neighborhood Portals WikiProject. Hope to see you there. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 07:41, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Commons says this photo "File:Langer.Susanne.foto 2.jpg" is being used on this portal. I cannot find it in the code of the portal. In fact it should be changed to this photo "File:Susanne Langer 1945.jpg" ~ R. T. G 11:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
The following GA-class articles are presently being displayed in the portal using transclusion from articles. Consensus at VPP has approved using transclusion templates in portals, which provides users with up-to-date content that is verbatim to that in articles. North America 1000 21:52, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
The following GA-class articles were added to the portal's Good article section today: Stoicism, Divine command theory, Buddhaghosa, Gary Varner, From Bakunin to Lacan. North America 1000 02:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Is this portal active? Editor2020 ( talk) 22:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello lovers of wisdom.
I think people here probably could assist in making the epistemological and ontological presuppositions of certain authors writing in this field more explicit to help those who aren't familiar with the topic get a basic grasp of it.
Kind regards,
Pauloroboto ( talk) 12:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I would like to share a vision for a real-time fact-checking resource: Wikifact. I hope that the project is of some interest to those who contribute to Wikipedia in this philosophy portal.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikifact
In the not-too-distant future, it may become possible for end-users to fact-check arbitrary portions of documents in word processors and Web browsers simply by selecting content, using context menus, and making use of crowdsourced, collaborative resources such as Wikifact. End-users would be able to select content from social media websites, news articles, digital textbooks, or arbitrary other documents and websites, and then open context menus providing options for exploring, e.g., fact-checking, the content.
I am hoping that more people will express interest on the project proposal’s website. I am hoping to publicize the project proposal. I am hoping to disseminate these ideas.
Please express your support for or opposition to the proposal on the project’s wiki page. We also welcome any of your comments, questions, or feedback with respect to the proposal, in particular ideas for improving it. Please feel free to share any of your ideas in our talk pages.
Thank you, AdamSobieski ( talk) 09:46, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi fellow Wikipedians, does anyone know why there are three pages essentially fulfilling the same purpose? I am talking about Portal:Philosophy, Wikipedia:Contents/Philosophy and thinking and Draft:Contents of philosophy. Can't we simply opt for one and delete the others? Infogiraffic ( talk) 15:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)