The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus from below choices. Dough 4872 01:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

• California State Route 33 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevon kevono ( talk • contribs) 04:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
  • @ Kevon kevono: I'd suggest you nominate an article that's been promoted to Good Article (GA-Class). This one is only rated as a Start-Class, and normally we've required at least B-Class as noted in the directions above and we've preferred GA-Class or better to run as the selected article. Imzadi 1979  → 09:28, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Article quality is too poor, as mentioned by Imzadi1979. Dough 4872 18:06, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

I wouldn't say "too poor", but yes the article needs work. I would say put some polish on it, and nominate it in a couple of months after the polish has been applied and some 3rd parties have reviewed the article. Dave ( talk) 18:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

• • The History section needs to be edited, but everything else is fine; I agree with your oppositions. Kevon kevono ( talk • contribs) 15:36, 10 April 2016 (PT)
• California State Route 3; Kevon kevono ( talk) 19:32, 19 April 2016
  • Support - Although we just had a California article in January, I appreciate the suggestion of an article for a change. However, I would not suggest any more California articles for selected article for the rest of the year, so other states can have a chance. Dough 4872 01:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • On second thought, this article looks in poor shape considering its a 146 mile route, the lead and route description are awfully short and there's some unsourced information. Therefore, I must oppose this selection and will pick a better quality article from another state. Dough 4872 01:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

I'm gonna be bold and go ahead and select US 195 for June. Dough 4872 01:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

• U.S. Route 195. It would be Idaho's first SA on the portal. – Fredddie ™ 01:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Support - Looks good to me. Dough 4872 01:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Select Legacy Parkway. Dough 4872 02:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

• Interstate 296

This article could be listed for a April's Fools Day article, but the AFD feature had been discontinued since 2012 or 2013. The quality is "FA". Kevon kevono ( talk) 22:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC) (What the hell is UTC?) 15:47 (PT)

• Oppose - Just had a Michigan article for May, would prefer another state for regional balance. See Portal:U.S. Roads/Selected article/Regional balance for when the last time a state appeared as selected article and how many times states have appeared as selected article. Dough 4872 22:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
• Support Opposition Kevon kevono ( talk) 03:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC) (What the hell is UTC?) 20:17 (PT)

• Legacy Parkway

The last time Utah had a featured article was 2014, and this quality is A-Class, so I think this will be a fine article. Kevon kevono ( talk) 03:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)(What the hell is UTC?) 20:41 (PT)

• Support - Good quality article from Utah, which has not been featured in a couple years. For the future, you do not need to copy a preview of the article lead to this page. Dough 4872 04:39, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Select NC 54. Dough 4872 01:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

• North Carolina Highway 54 - Never had a North Carolina article before. Dough 4872 03:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Support
    Kevon kevono ( talk) 04:31, 29 July 2016 (UTC) 21:31 (PDT)
  • Support – Fredddie ™ 04:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus. Dough 4872 00:57, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

• Farm to Market Road 1528. My proposal for a very short highway in Texas. Kevon kevono ( talk) 21:14, 29 July 2016 (UTC) 14:12
  • Oppose—that's not "very short", and even so, there are articles of higher importance levels that can be featured ahead of it. Imzadi 1979  → 02:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.