In rhetorical analysis, to pooh-pooh an argument is to dismiss it as being unworthy of serious consideration. It is a fallacy in informal logic. [1]
Scholars generally characterize the fallacy as a rhetorical device in which the speaker ridicules an argument without responding to the substance of the argument. [2] It has been characterized as a form of a straw man fallacy, where an argument is described as inherently worthless or undeserving of serious attention. [3]
Some authors have also described the fallacy as the act of "ridicul[ing]" an argument as though it were "a myth", [4] and some characterize it as the act of dismissing an argument "with insults without responding to its substance in any way". [2] Other authors describe the fallacy as the act of dismissing an argument "with the wave of a hand". [5] Some sources also suggest the fallacy is an expression that involves "sneer[ing]", [5] "ridicule", [1] or "malicious comments about the proponent of the argument". [2] Some authors also suggest the term originated as a "representation of the act of spitting in sign of contemptuous rejection". [6] There is no evidence of a relationship with the slang word for feces.[ citation needed]
See also
References
- ^ a b Munson, Ronald; Black, Andrew (2016). The Elements of Reasoning. Cengage Learning. p. 257. ISBN 1305886836.
- ^ a b c Virginia Tech Intellectual Prop. (1999). Language and Logic. Kendall Hunt Publishing Company. p. 119. ISBN 0787262439.
- ^ See, e.g., Munson, Ronald; Black, Andrew (2016). The Elements of Reasoning. Cengage Learning. pp. 149, 257. ISBN 1305886836.
- ^ Dwight, Joyce Ingle (1976). Is It Really So?: A Guide to Clear Thinking. Westminster Press. p. 115. ISBN 0664247830.
- ^ a b Stanley, Maurice (2002). Logic and Controversy. Wadsworth. p. 98. ISBN 0534573789.
- ^ Wedgwood, Hensleigh (1859). Dictionary of English Etymology, Vol. 1. p. xiv. ISBN 9781230255484.
 | This logic-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
In rhetorical analysis, to pooh-pooh an argument is to dismiss it as being unworthy of serious consideration. It is a fallacy in informal logic. [1]
Scholars generally characterize the fallacy as a rhetorical device in which the speaker ridicules an argument without responding to the substance of the argument. [2] It has been characterized as a form of a straw man fallacy, where an argument is described as inherently worthless or undeserving of serious attention. [3]
Some authors have also described the fallacy as the act of "ridicul[ing]" an argument as though it were "a myth", [4] and some characterize it as the act of dismissing an argument "with insults without responding to its substance in any way". [2] Other authors describe the fallacy as the act of dismissing an argument "with the wave of a hand". [5] Some sources also suggest the fallacy is an expression that involves "sneer[ing]", [5] "ridicule", [1] or "malicious comments about the proponent of the argument". [2] Some authors also suggest the term originated as a "representation of the act of spitting in sign of contemptuous rejection". [6] There is no evidence of a relationship with the slang word for feces.[ citation needed]
See also
References
- ^ a b Munson, Ronald; Black, Andrew (2016). The Elements of Reasoning. Cengage Learning. p. 257. ISBN 1305886836.
- ^ a b c Virginia Tech Intellectual Prop. (1999). Language and Logic. Kendall Hunt Publishing Company. p. 119. ISBN 0787262439.
- ^ See, e.g., Munson, Ronald; Black, Andrew (2016). The Elements of Reasoning. Cengage Learning. pp. 149, 257. ISBN 1305886836.
- ^ Dwight, Joyce Ingle (1976). Is It Really So?: A Guide to Clear Thinking. Westminster Press. p. 115. ISBN 0664247830.
- ^ a b Stanley, Maurice (2002). Logic and Controversy. Wadsworth. p. 98. ISBN 0534573789.
- ^ Wedgwood, Hensleigh (1859). Dictionary of English Etymology, Vol. 1. p. xiv. ISBN 9781230255484.
|
| This logic-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |