Penal Code of Myanmar ရာဇသတ်ကြီး | |
---|---|
Original title | India Act XLV, 1860 |
Date effective | 1 May 1861 |
The Penal Code of Myanmar is the official criminal code of Myanmar. The code was enacted on 1 May 1861 during British rule in Burma and is divided into 23 chapters. [1] [2] The Penal Code of Myanmar is nearly identical to the Indian Penal Code, due to their shared origins under British rule. [3]
Sections 505(a) and 505(b) of the Penal Code are commonly used against journalists, activists, and protestors. [4] [5] As of 30 April 2020, 8 of the 50 convicted political prisoners were serving sentences for violating one or both of said sections. [5] In the aftermath of the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état, the military junta amended section 505(a) to criminalise "fake news" and "incitement" against the military. [4] Lawyers who represent activists and politicians have also been charged under section 505(a). [6]
Section 377 criminalises consensual same-sex sexual conduct, and LGBT rights groups have called for the section to be abolished, [7] [8] [9]
Penal Code of Myanmar ရာဇသတ်ကြီး | |
---|---|
Original title | India Act XLV, 1860 |
Date effective | 1 May 1861 |
The Penal Code of Myanmar is the official criminal code of Myanmar. The code was enacted on 1 May 1861 during British rule in Burma and is divided into 23 chapters. [1] [2] The Penal Code of Myanmar is nearly identical to the Indian Penal Code, due to their shared origins under British rule. [3]
Sections 505(a) and 505(b) of the Penal Code are commonly used against journalists, activists, and protestors. [4] [5] As of 30 April 2020, 8 of the 50 convicted political prisoners were serving sentences for violating one or both of said sections. [5] In the aftermath of the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état, the military junta amended section 505(a) to criminalise "fake news" and "incitement" against the military. [4] Lawyers who represent activists and politicians have also been charged under section 505(a). [6]
Section 377 criminalises consensual same-sex sexual conduct, and LGBT rights groups have called for the section to be abolished, [7] [8] [9]