This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Music ratings template. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
The template doc says that the default width of 24.2em matches the width of the album infobox in most browsers and skins. The album infobox width is 22em. I am using the latest version of Chrome. For me, the Ratings box is wider than the album infobox with the Vector (legacy and new), MinervaNeue, MonoBook and Timeless skins. Also with Firefox and Vector. Is the statement about "most browsers and skins" correct? If not, should Template:Album_ratings be reduced to 22em as well, or should the doc just be corrected? Thanks. Nurg ( talk) 08:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Module:Album ratings has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I suppose the width of this template/module should be changed to 22em to match the width of album infoboxes: see any article in Category:Articles with album ratings that need to be turned into prose. Solidest ( talk) 14:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
:css('width', args.width or '24.2em')
. I set it to 22em in the sandbox module, and that works well in my Chrome browser. YMMV.
P.I. Ellsworth ,
ed.
put'r there
20:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)|answered=no
.
P.I. Ellsworth ,
ed.
put'r there
05:36, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Hello, there has been a music critic rising to fame in the past ten years, his name is Anthony Fantano. Whether you agree with him or not, he is quite prominent, which is why I am opening a discussion to start adding his personal album reviews to the Album ratings template (the way Robert Christgau has his own category). Please discuss. Marmio ( talk) 08:07, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Album ratings has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Template:Album ratings has been listed at Templates for discussion ( nomination), but it was protected, so it could not be tagged. Please add:
{{subst:tfm|help=off|type=sidebar|1=Song ratings}}
to the top of the page to complete the nomination. Thank you. QuietHere ( talk) 06:18, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Is it possible to have the template automatically sort the ratings alphabetically? It gets very tedious having to shift a bunch of parameters just because Allmusic, for example, published their review after the article was created. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 23:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
|rev1 = Pitchfork |rev2 = The Guardian |sort2 = "Guardian" |rev3 = AllMusic
I've done the work to merge Template:Song ratings, Template:Album ratings, and Template:Single ratings into one music ratings template now as a result of the TFD (it was effectively nothing).
I've done the minimal work to update Template:Music ratings/doc to make the language in it applicable to songs as well as best I can. Page watchers may be interested in further adjustment with instructions from Template:Single ratings/doc and Template:Song ratings/doc. Izno ( talk) 02:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
I feel like having the reviews on TOP of the paragraphs is sort of choppy. Shouldn't we place the template to the right of the review paragraphs so that they compliment each other? Kind of like biography templates are laid out. skelter ( talk) 19:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
This template is generally the first element after the heading for the section on Reception, Critical reception, Reviews, or something similar. If one of those sections is not present, the template should be placed immediately after the infobox, and can then be moved once a Reception section is present.– Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Music ratings template. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
The template doc says that the default width of 24.2em matches the width of the album infobox in most browsers and skins. The album infobox width is 22em. I am using the latest version of Chrome. For me, the Ratings box is wider than the album infobox with the Vector (legacy and new), MinervaNeue, MonoBook and Timeless skins. Also with Firefox and Vector. Is the statement about "most browsers and skins" correct? If not, should Template:Album_ratings be reduced to 22em as well, or should the doc just be corrected? Thanks. Nurg ( talk) 08:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Module:Album ratings has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I suppose the width of this template/module should be changed to 22em to match the width of album infoboxes: see any article in Category:Articles with album ratings that need to be turned into prose. Solidest ( talk) 14:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
:css('width', args.width or '24.2em')
. I set it to 22em in the sandbox module, and that works well in my Chrome browser. YMMV.
P.I. Ellsworth ,
ed.
put'r there
20:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)|answered=no
.
P.I. Ellsworth ,
ed.
put'r there
05:36, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Hello, there has been a music critic rising to fame in the past ten years, his name is Anthony Fantano. Whether you agree with him or not, he is quite prominent, which is why I am opening a discussion to start adding his personal album reviews to the Album ratings template (the way Robert Christgau has his own category). Please discuss. Marmio ( talk) 08:07, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Album ratings has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Template:Album ratings has been listed at Templates for discussion ( nomination), but it was protected, so it could not be tagged. Please add:
{{subst:tfm|help=off|type=sidebar|1=Song ratings}}
to the top of the page to complete the nomination. Thank you. QuietHere ( talk) 06:18, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Is it possible to have the template automatically sort the ratings alphabetically? It gets very tedious having to shift a bunch of parameters just because Allmusic, for example, published their review after the article was created. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 23:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
|rev1 = Pitchfork |rev2 = The Guardian |sort2 = "Guardian" |rev3 = AllMusic
I've done the work to merge Template:Song ratings, Template:Album ratings, and Template:Single ratings into one music ratings template now as a result of the TFD (it was effectively nothing).
I've done the minimal work to update Template:Music ratings/doc to make the language in it applicable to songs as well as best I can. Page watchers may be interested in further adjustment with instructions from Template:Single ratings/doc and Template:Song ratings/doc. Izno ( talk) 02:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
I feel like having the reviews on TOP of the paragraphs is sort of choppy. Shouldn't we place the template to the right of the review paragraphs so that they compliment each other? Kind of like biography templates are laid out. skelter ( talk) 19:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
This template is generally the first element after the heading for the section on Reception, Critical reception, Reviews, or something similar. If one of those sections is not present, the template should be placed immediately after the infobox, and can then be moved once a Reception section is present.– Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)