(Redirected from
Module talk:CoxeterâDynkin diagram)
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved ( non-admin closure). Xain36 ( talk) 03:28, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
â Clarify name {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 04:19, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support because CDD doesn't intuitively refer to Coxeter-Dynkin diagram -- DannyS712 ( talk) 19:46, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support - per above, as can be seen at CDD. -- Gonnym ( talk) 14:01, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
- I don't support this move. There are many hundreds of these template instances in use, [1]. The reason for a short template is to have something easy to write for easily generating symbols. Tom Ruen ( talk) 09:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- The move has broken things at Coxeter_group Tom Ruen ( talk) 10:03, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
(Redirected from
Module talk:CoxeterâDynkin diagram)
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved ( non-admin closure). Xain36 ( talk) 03:28, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
â Clarify name {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 04:19, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support because CDD doesn't intuitively refer to Coxeter-Dynkin diagram -- DannyS712 ( talk) 19:46, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support - per above, as can be seen at CDD. -- Gonnym ( talk) 14:01, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
- I don't support this move. There are many hundreds of these template instances in use, [1]. The reason for a short template is to have something easy to write for easily generating symbols. Tom Ruen ( talk) 09:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- The move has broken things at Coxeter_group Tom Ruen ( talk) 10:03, 27 February 2019 (UTC)