In economics, the Metzler paradox (named after the American economist Lloyd Metzler) is the theoretical possibility that the imposition of a tariff on imports may reduce the relative internal price of that good. [1] It was proposed by Lloyd Metzler in 1949 upon examination of tariffs within the Heckscher–Ohlin model. [2] The paradox has roughly the same status as immiserizing growth and a transfer that makes the recipient worse off. [3]
This peculiar outcome could occur if the offer curve of the exporting country is highly inelastic. In such a scenario, the tariff reduces the duty-free cost of the imported goods to such an extent that the effect of improving the terms of trade of the tariff-imposing countries on relative prices outweighs the impact of the tariff. Such a tariff would not effectively protect the industry competing with the imported goods.
However, in practice, this scenario is deemed unlikely. [4] [5]
See also
References
- ^ Casas, François R.; Choi, Eun K. (1985). "The Metzler Paradox and the Non-equivalence of Tariffs and Quotas: Further Results". Journal of Economic Studies. 12 (5): 53–57. doi: 10.1108/eb002612.
- ^ Metzler, Lloyd A. (1949). "Tariffs, the Terms of Trade, and the Distribution of National Income". Journal of Political Economy. 57 (1): 1–29. doi: 10.1086/256766. S2CID 153833656.
- ^ Krugman and Obstfeld (2003), p. 112
- ^ de Haan, Werner A.; Visser, Patrice (December 1979). "A note on tariffs, quotas, and the Metzler Paradox: An alternative approach". Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 115 (4): 736–741. doi: 10.1007/bf02696743. S2CID 153602151.
- ^ Krugman and Obstfeld (2003), p. 113
Further reading
- Krugman, Paul R.; Obstfeld, Maurice (2003). "Chapter 5: The Standard Trade Model". International Economics: Theory and Policy (6th ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley. p. 112. ISBN 0-321-11639-9.
 | This international trade related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
In economics, the Metzler paradox (named after the American economist Lloyd Metzler) is the theoretical possibility that the imposition of a tariff on imports may reduce the relative internal price of that good. [1] It was proposed by Lloyd Metzler in 1949 upon examination of tariffs within the Heckscher–Ohlin model. [2] The paradox has roughly the same status as immiserizing growth and a transfer that makes the recipient worse off. [3]
This peculiar outcome could occur if the offer curve of the exporting country is highly inelastic. In such a scenario, the tariff reduces the duty-free cost of the imported goods to such an extent that the effect of improving the terms of trade of the tariff-imposing countries on relative prices outweighs the impact of the tariff. Such a tariff would not effectively protect the industry competing with the imported goods.
However, in practice, this scenario is deemed unlikely. [4] [5]
See also
References
- ^ Casas, François R.; Choi, Eun K. (1985). "The Metzler Paradox and the Non-equivalence of Tariffs and Quotas: Further Results". Journal of Economic Studies. 12 (5): 53–57. doi: 10.1108/eb002612.
- ^ Metzler, Lloyd A. (1949). "Tariffs, the Terms of Trade, and the Distribution of National Income". Journal of Political Economy. 57 (1): 1–29. doi: 10.1086/256766. S2CID 153833656.
- ^ Krugman and Obstfeld (2003), p. 112
- ^ de Haan, Werner A.; Visser, Patrice (December 1979). "A note on tariffs, quotas, and the Metzler Paradox: An alternative approach". Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 115 (4): 736–741. doi: 10.1007/bf02696743. S2CID 153602151.
- ^ Krugman and Obstfeld (2003), p. 113
Further reading
- Krugman, Paul R.; Obstfeld, Maurice (2003). "Chapter 5: The Standard Trade Model". International Economics: Theory and Policy (6th ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley. p. 112. ISBN 0-321-11639-9.
|
| This international trade related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |