This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

A to dz is 130 cites, is there any chance of someone could raising the limit beyond 130? Maybe add ea to fz? -- Dual Freq 19:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

That sounds like a good idea. I've added an {{ editprotected}} tag so that an admin notices this. Tra (Talk) 20:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, Gentgeen for adding these. Tra (Talk) 22:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Could we get ia to lz? Thanks. I never expected to use all of the ones we've got, but here I am... I don't need all of these (at least, not yet), but it can't hurt to have a few extra. — Disavian ( ^talk/ _contribs) 14:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Y Done. :) Somehow, I never knew about this page, before -- we learn something every day, eh? – Luna Santin ( talk) 21:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

If the same source is being cited 338 times, possibly the <ref> tag isn't the best choice for citing it... -- ais523 13:09, 16 March 2007 ( U T C)

I've found that having a large number of references to a single reference is particularly useful for lists with a reference for each entry, especially if a certain reference supports the inclusion of a large number of list entries. — Disavian ( ^talk/ _contribs) 19:10, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I got past 702 on this page... it will probably need a lot more, but there are probably few pages that will also have this high a number, so it would probably be better for me to just simplify it. Someone the Person ( talk) 22:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Scratch that -- I'll still need some three-letter backlinks eventually. Someone the Person ( talk) 02:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

More than a dozen or so backlinks starts to look ugly and is confusing. Consider the use of {{ cref}} for a reference used a large number of times. --——  Gadget850 (Ed)  ^talk - 14:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)