The Koopman–von Neumann (KvN) theory is a description of classical mechanics as an
operatorial theory similar to
quantum mechanics, based on a
Hilbert space of
complex,
square-integrable wavefunctions. As its name suggests, the KvN theory is loosely related to work by
Bernard Koopman and
John von Neumann in 1931 and 1932, respectively.[1][2][3] As explained in this entry, however, the historical origins of the theory and its name are complicated.
History
Statistical mechanics describes macroscopic systems in terms of
statistical ensembles, such as the macroscopic properties of an
ideal gas. Ergodic theory is a branch of mathematics arising from the study of statistical mechanics.
Ergodic theory
The origins of the Koopman–von Neumann theory are tightly connected with the rise[when?] of
ergodic theory as an independent branch of mathematics, in particular with
Boltzmann'sergodic hypothesis.
The Koopman-von Neumann theory is often used today to refer to a reformulation of classical mechanics in which a classical system's probability density on phase space is expressed in terms of an underlying wavefunction, meaning that the vectors of the classical Hilbert space are wavefunctions, rather than physical observables.
This approach did not originate with Koopman or von Neumann, for whom the classical Hilbert space consisted of physical observables, rather than wavefunctions. Indeed, as noted in 1961 by Thomas F. Jordan and
E. C. George Sudarshan:
It was shown by Koopman how the dynamical transformations of classical mechanics, considered as measure preserving transformations of the phase space, induce unitary transformations on the Hilbert space of functions which are square integrable with respect to a density function over the phase space. This Hilbert space formulation of classical mechanics was further developed by von Neumann. It is to be noted that this Hilbert space corresponds not to the space of state vectors in quantum mechanics but to the Hilbert space of operators on the state vectors (with the trace of the product of two operators being chosen as the scalar product).[4]
The practice of expressing classical probability distributions on phase space in terms of underlying wavefunctions goes back at least to the 1952–1953 work of
Mário Schenberg on statistical mechanics.[5][6] This method was independently developed several more times, by Angelo Loinger in 1962,[7] by Giacomo Della Riccia and Norbert Wiener in 1966,[8] and by
E. C. George Sudarshan himself in 1976.[9]
The name "Koopman-von Neumann theory" for representing classical systems based on Hilbert spaces made up of classical wavefunctions is therefore an example of
Stigler's law of eponymy. This misattribution appears to have first shown up in a paper by Danilo Mauro in 2002.[10]
Definition and dynamics
Derivation starting from the Liouville equation
In the approach of Koopman and von Neumann (KvN), dynamics in
phase space is described by a (classical) probability density, recovered from an underlying wavefunction – the Koopman–von Neumann wavefunction – as the square of its absolute value (more precisely, as the amplitude multiplied with its own
complex conjugate). This stands in analogy to the
Born rule in quantum mechanics. In the KvN framework, observables are represented by commuting self-adjoint operators acting on the
Hilbert space of KvN wavefunctions. The commutativity physically implies that all observables are simultaneously measurable. Contrast this with quantum mechanics, where observables need not commute, which underlines the
uncertainty principle,
Kochen–Specker theorem, and
Bell inequalities.[11]
The KvN wavefunction is postulated to evolve according to exactly the same
Liouville equation as the classical probability density. From this postulate it can be shown that indeed probability density dynamics is recovered.
Dynamics of the probability density (proof)
In classical statistical mechanics, the probability density (with respect to
Liouville measure) obeys the Liouville equation[12][13]
with the self-adjoint Liouvillian
where denotes the
classical Hamiltonian (i.e. the Liouvillian is times the
Hamiltonian vector field considered as a first order differential operator).
The same dynamical equation is postulated for the KvN wavefunction
which proves that probability density dynamics can be recovered from the KvN wavefunction.
Remark
The last step of this derivation relies on the classical Liouville operator containing only first-order derivatives in the coordinate and momentum; this is not the case in quantum mechanics where the
Schrödinger equation contains second-order derivatives.
Conversely, it is possible to start from operator postulates, similar to the
Hilbert space axioms of quantum mechanics, and derive the equation of motion by specifying how expectation values evolve.[14]
The relevant axioms are that as in quantum mechanics (i) the states of a system are represented by normalized vectors of a complex Hilbert space, and the observables are given by
self-adjoint operators acting on that space, (ii) the expectation value of an observable is obtained in the manner as the
expectation value in quantum mechanics, (iii) the probabilities of measuring certain values of some observables are calculated by the
Born rule, and (iv) the state space of a composite system is the
tensor product of the subsystem's spaces.
These axioms allow us to recover the formalism of both classical and quantum mechanics.[14] Specifically, under the assumption that the classical position and momentum operators
commute, the Liouville equation for the KvN wavefunction is recovered from averaged
Newton's laws of motion. However, if the coordinate and momentum obey the
canonical commutation relation, the
Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics is obtained.
into which we substitute a consequence of
Stone's theorem and obtain
Since these identities must be valid for any initial state, the averaging can be dropped and the system of commutator equations for the unknown is derived
(commutator eqs for L)
Assume that the coordinate and momentum commute . This assumption physically means that the classical particle's coordinate and momentum can be measured simultaneously, implying absence of the
uncertainty principle.
The solution cannot be simply of the form because it would imply the contractions and . Therefore, we must utilize additional operators and obeying
(KvN algebra)
The need to employ these auxiliary operators arises because all classical observables commute. Now we seek in the form . Utilizing KvN algebra, the commutator eqs for L can be converted into the following differential equations:[14][16]
Whence, we conclude that the classical KvN wave function evolves according to the
Schrödinger-like equation of motion
Projecting equation (KvN dynamical eq) onto , we get the equation of motion for the KvN wave function in the xp-representation
(KvN dynamical eq in xp)
The quantity is the probability amplitude for a classical particle to be at point with momentum at time . According to the
axioms above, the probability density is given by
. Utilizing the identity
Therefore, the rule for calculating averages of observable in classical statistical mechanics has been recovered from the
operator axioms with the additional assumption . As a result, the phase of a classical wave function does not contribute to observable averages. Contrary to quantum mechanics, the phase of a KvN wave function is physically irrelevant. Hence, nonexistence of the
double-slit experiment[13][17][18] as well as
Aharonov–Bohm effect[19] is established in the KvN mechanics.
where was introduced as a normalization constant to balance dimensionality. Since these identities must be valid for any initial state, the averaging can be dropped and the system of commutator equations for the unknown quantum generator of motion are derived
Contrary to the case of
classical mechanics, we assume that observables of the coordinate and momentum obey the
canonical commutation relation. Setting , the commutator equations can be converted into the differential equations
[14][16]
Whence, the
Schrödinger equation was derived from the Ehrenfest theorems by assuming the canonical commutation relation between the coordinate and momentum. This derivation as well as the
derivation of classical KvN mechanics shows that the difference between quantum and classical mechanics essentially boils down to the value of the commutator .
Measurements
In the Hilbert space and operator formulation of classical mechanics, the Koopman von Neumann–wavefunction takes the form of a superposition of eigenstates, and measurement collapses the KvN wavefunction to the eigenstate which is associated the measurement result, in analogy to the
wave function collapse of quantum mechanics.
However, it can be shown that for Koopman–von Neumann classical mechanics non-selective measurements leave the KvN wavefunction unchanged.[12]
The KvN approach is fruitful in studies on the
quantum-classical correspondence[14][15][34][35][36] as it reveals that the Hilbert space formulation is not exclusively quantum mechanical.[37] Even
Dirac spinors are not exceptionally quantum as they are utilized in the relativistic generalization of the KvN mechanics.[30] Similarly as the more well-known
phase space formulation of quantum mechanics, the KvN approach can be understood as an attempt to bring classical and quantum mechanics into a common mathematical framework. In fact, the time evolution of the
Wigner function approaches, in the classical limit, the time evolution of the KvN wavefunction of a classical particle.[30][38] However, a mathematical resemblance to quantum mechanics does not imply the presence of hallmark quantum effects. In particular, impossibility of
double-slit experiment[13][17][18] and
Aharonov–Bohm effect[19] are explicitly demonstrated in the KvN framework.
Quantum counterpart of the classical KvN propagation on the left: The
Wigner function time evolution of the
Morse potential in
atomic units (a.u.). The solid lines represent the
level set of the underlying
Hamiltonian. Note that the same initial condition used for this quantum propagation as well as for the KvN propagation on the left.
^von Neumann, J. (1932). "Zur Operatorenmethode In Der Klassischen Mechanik". Annals of Mathematics (in German). 33 (3): 587–642.
doi:
10.2307/1968537.
JSTOR1968537.
^von Neumann, J. (1932). "Zusatze Zur Arbeit 'Zur Operatorenmethode...'". Annals of Mathematics (in German). 33 (4): 789–791.
doi:
10.2307/1968225.
JSTOR1968225.
^Blokhintsev, D.I. (1940). "The Gibbs Quantum Ensemble and its Connection with the Classical Ensemble". J. Phys. U.S.S.R. 2 (1): 71–74.
^Blokhintsev, D.I.; Nemirovsky, P (1940). "Connection of the Quantum Ensemble with the Gibbs Classical Ensemble. II". J. Phys. U.S.S.R. 3 (3): 191–194.
^Blokhintsev, D.I.; Dadyshevsky, Ya. B. (1941). "On Separation of a System into Quantum and Classical Parts". Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 11 (2–3): 222–225.
^Bracken, A. J. (2003). "Quantum mechanics as an approximation to classical mechanics in Hilbert space", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 36(23), L329.
The Legacy of John von Neumann (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol 50), edited by James Glimm, John Impagliazzo, Isadore Singer. — Amata Graphics, 2006. —
ISBN0821842196
U. Klein, From Koopman–von Neumann theory to quantum theory, Quantum Stud.: Math. Found. (2018) 5:219–227.
[1]
The Koopman–von Neumann (KvN) theory is a description of classical mechanics as an
operatorial theory similar to
quantum mechanics, based on a
Hilbert space of
complex,
square-integrable wavefunctions. As its name suggests, the KvN theory is loosely related to work by
Bernard Koopman and
John von Neumann in 1931 and 1932, respectively.[1][2][3] As explained in this entry, however, the historical origins of the theory and its name are complicated.
History
Statistical mechanics describes macroscopic systems in terms of
statistical ensembles, such as the macroscopic properties of an
ideal gas. Ergodic theory is a branch of mathematics arising from the study of statistical mechanics.
Ergodic theory
The origins of the Koopman–von Neumann theory are tightly connected with the rise[when?] of
ergodic theory as an independent branch of mathematics, in particular with
Boltzmann'sergodic hypothesis.
The Koopman-von Neumann theory is often used today to refer to a reformulation of classical mechanics in which a classical system's probability density on phase space is expressed in terms of an underlying wavefunction, meaning that the vectors of the classical Hilbert space are wavefunctions, rather than physical observables.
This approach did not originate with Koopman or von Neumann, for whom the classical Hilbert space consisted of physical observables, rather than wavefunctions. Indeed, as noted in 1961 by Thomas F. Jordan and
E. C. George Sudarshan:
It was shown by Koopman how the dynamical transformations of classical mechanics, considered as measure preserving transformations of the phase space, induce unitary transformations on the Hilbert space of functions which are square integrable with respect to a density function over the phase space. This Hilbert space formulation of classical mechanics was further developed by von Neumann. It is to be noted that this Hilbert space corresponds not to the space of state vectors in quantum mechanics but to the Hilbert space of operators on the state vectors (with the trace of the product of two operators being chosen as the scalar product).[4]
The practice of expressing classical probability distributions on phase space in terms of underlying wavefunctions goes back at least to the 1952–1953 work of
Mário Schenberg on statistical mechanics.[5][6] This method was independently developed several more times, by Angelo Loinger in 1962,[7] by Giacomo Della Riccia and Norbert Wiener in 1966,[8] and by
E. C. George Sudarshan himself in 1976.[9]
The name "Koopman-von Neumann theory" for representing classical systems based on Hilbert spaces made up of classical wavefunctions is therefore an example of
Stigler's law of eponymy. This misattribution appears to have first shown up in a paper by Danilo Mauro in 2002.[10]
Definition and dynamics
Derivation starting from the Liouville equation
In the approach of Koopman and von Neumann (KvN), dynamics in
phase space is described by a (classical) probability density, recovered from an underlying wavefunction – the Koopman–von Neumann wavefunction – as the square of its absolute value (more precisely, as the amplitude multiplied with its own
complex conjugate). This stands in analogy to the
Born rule in quantum mechanics. In the KvN framework, observables are represented by commuting self-adjoint operators acting on the
Hilbert space of KvN wavefunctions. The commutativity physically implies that all observables are simultaneously measurable. Contrast this with quantum mechanics, where observables need not commute, which underlines the
uncertainty principle,
Kochen–Specker theorem, and
Bell inequalities.[11]
The KvN wavefunction is postulated to evolve according to exactly the same
Liouville equation as the classical probability density. From this postulate it can be shown that indeed probability density dynamics is recovered.
Dynamics of the probability density (proof)
In classical statistical mechanics, the probability density (with respect to
Liouville measure) obeys the Liouville equation[12][13]
with the self-adjoint Liouvillian
where denotes the
classical Hamiltonian (i.e. the Liouvillian is times the
Hamiltonian vector field considered as a first order differential operator).
The same dynamical equation is postulated for the KvN wavefunction
which proves that probability density dynamics can be recovered from the KvN wavefunction.
Remark
The last step of this derivation relies on the classical Liouville operator containing only first-order derivatives in the coordinate and momentum; this is not the case in quantum mechanics where the
Schrödinger equation contains second-order derivatives.
Conversely, it is possible to start from operator postulates, similar to the
Hilbert space axioms of quantum mechanics, and derive the equation of motion by specifying how expectation values evolve.[14]
The relevant axioms are that as in quantum mechanics (i) the states of a system are represented by normalized vectors of a complex Hilbert space, and the observables are given by
self-adjoint operators acting on that space, (ii) the expectation value of an observable is obtained in the manner as the
expectation value in quantum mechanics, (iii) the probabilities of measuring certain values of some observables are calculated by the
Born rule, and (iv) the state space of a composite system is the
tensor product of the subsystem's spaces.
These axioms allow us to recover the formalism of both classical and quantum mechanics.[14] Specifically, under the assumption that the classical position and momentum operators
commute, the Liouville equation for the KvN wavefunction is recovered from averaged
Newton's laws of motion. However, if the coordinate and momentum obey the
canonical commutation relation, the
Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics is obtained.
into which we substitute a consequence of
Stone's theorem and obtain
Since these identities must be valid for any initial state, the averaging can be dropped and the system of commutator equations for the unknown is derived
(commutator eqs for L)
Assume that the coordinate and momentum commute . This assumption physically means that the classical particle's coordinate and momentum can be measured simultaneously, implying absence of the
uncertainty principle.
The solution cannot be simply of the form because it would imply the contractions and . Therefore, we must utilize additional operators and obeying
(KvN algebra)
The need to employ these auxiliary operators arises because all classical observables commute. Now we seek in the form . Utilizing KvN algebra, the commutator eqs for L can be converted into the following differential equations:[14][16]
Whence, we conclude that the classical KvN wave function evolves according to the
Schrödinger-like equation of motion
Projecting equation (KvN dynamical eq) onto , we get the equation of motion for the KvN wave function in the xp-representation
(KvN dynamical eq in xp)
The quantity is the probability amplitude for a classical particle to be at point with momentum at time . According to the
axioms above, the probability density is given by
. Utilizing the identity
Therefore, the rule for calculating averages of observable in classical statistical mechanics has been recovered from the
operator axioms with the additional assumption . As a result, the phase of a classical wave function does not contribute to observable averages. Contrary to quantum mechanics, the phase of a KvN wave function is physically irrelevant. Hence, nonexistence of the
double-slit experiment[13][17][18] as well as
Aharonov–Bohm effect[19] is established in the KvN mechanics.
where was introduced as a normalization constant to balance dimensionality. Since these identities must be valid for any initial state, the averaging can be dropped and the system of commutator equations for the unknown quantum generator of motion are derived
Contrary to the case of
classical mechanics, we assume that observables of the coordinate and momentum obey the
canonical commutation relation. Setting , the commutator equations can be converted into the differential equations
[14][16]
Whence, the
Schrödinger equation was derived from the Ehrenfest theorems by assuming the canonical commutation relation between the coordinate and momentum. This derivation as well as the
derivation of classical KvN mechanics shows that the difference between quantum and classical mechanics essentially boils down to the value of the commutator .
Measurements
In the Hilbert space and operator formulation of classical mechanics, the Koopman von Neumann–wavefunction takes the form of a superposition of eigenstates, and measurement collapses the KvN wavefunction to the eigenstate which is associated the measurement result, in analogy to the
wave function collapse of quantum mechanics.
However, it can be shown that for Koopman–von Neumann classical mechanics non-selective measurements leave the KvN wavefunction unchanged.[12]
The KvN approach is fruitful in studies on the
quantum-classical correspondence[14][15][34][35][36] as it reveals that the Hilbert space formulation is not exclusively quantum mechanical.[37] Even
Dirac spinors are not exceptionally quantum as they are utilized in the relativistic generalization of the KvN mechanics.[30] Similarly as the more well-known
phase space formulation of quantum mechanics, the KvN approach can be understood as an attempt to bring classical and quantum mechanics into a common mathematical framework. In fact, the time evolution of the
Wigner function approaches, in the classical limit, the time evolution of the KvN wavefunction of a classical particle.[30][38] However, a mathematical resemblance to quantum mechanics does not imply the presence of hallmark quantum effects. In particular, impossibility of
double-slit experiment[13][17][18] and
Aharonov–Bohm effect[19] are explicitly demonstrated in the KvN framework.
Quantum counterpart of the classical KvN propagation on the left: The
Wigner function time evolution of the
Morse potential in
atomic units (a.u.). The solid lines represent the
level set of the underlying
Hamiltonian. Note that the same initial condition used for this quantum propagation as well as for the KvN propagation on the left.
^von Neumann, J. (1932). "Zur Operatorenmethode In Der Klassischen Mechanik". Annals of Mathematics (in German). 33 (3): 587–642.
doi:
10.2307/1968537.
JSTOR1968537.
^von Neumann, J. (1932). "Zusatze Zur Arbeit 'Zur Operatorenmethode...'". Annals of Mathematics (in German). 33 (4): 789–791.
doi:
10.2307/1968225.
JSTOR1968225.
^Blokhintsev, D.I. (1940). "The Gibbs Quantum Ensemble and its Connection with the Classical Ensemble". J. Phys. U.S.S.R. 2 (1): 71–74.
^Blokhintsev, D.I.; Nemirovsky, P (1940). "Connection of the Quantum Ensemble with the Gibbs Classical Ensemble. II". J. Phys. U.S.S.R. 3 (3): 191–194.
^Blokhintsev, D.I.; Dadyshevsky, Ya. B. (1941). "On Separation of a System into Quantum and Classical Parts". Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 11 (2–3): 222–225.
^Bracken, A. J. (2003). "Quantum mechanics as an approximation to classical mechanics in Hilbert space", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 36(23), L329.
The Legacy of John von Neumann (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol 50), edited by James Glimm, John Impagliazzo, Isadore Singer. — Amata Graphics, 2006. —
ISBN0821842196
U. Klein, From Koopman–von Neumann theory to quantum theory, Quantum Stud.: Math. Found. (2018) 5:219–227.
[1]