| Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe | |
|---|---|
.svg) | |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Decided | 11 October 2006 |
| Citations |
|
| Case history | |
| Prior action | [2005] EWCA Civ 74 |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting |
|
Jameel & Ors v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [1] was a House of Lords judgment on English defamation law. The issue was whether the defamatory article was protected by Reynolds privilege. The judgment was an affirmation of Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd and effectively upholds a public interest defence in libel cases.
References
External links
- Jameel and others v. Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2006] UKHL 44
- Jameel & Anor v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl (No.2) [2005] EWCA Civ 74 (3 February 2005)
| Core subjects |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Further subjects | ||
| Related systems | ||
|
| This article related to English law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This case law article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
| Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe | |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Decided | 11 October 2006 |
| Citations |
|
| Case history | |
| Prior action | [2005] EWCA Civ 74 |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting |
|
Jameel & Ors v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [1] was a House of Lords judgment on English defamation law. The issue was whether the defamatory article was protected by Reynolds privilege. The judgment was an affirmation of Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd and effectively upholds a public interest defence in libel cases.
References
External links
- Jameel and others v. Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2006] UKHL 44
- Jameel & Anor v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl (No.2) [2005] EWCA Civ 74 (3 February 2005)
| Core subjects | | |
|---|---|---|
| Further subjects | ||
| Related systems | ||
|
| This article related to English law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
|
| This case law article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |