Jackson v. Denno | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued December 9–10, 1963 Decided June 22, 1964 | |
Full case name | Nathan Jackson, Petitioner v. Wilfred Denno, Warden |
Citations | 378 U.S. 368 ( more) |
Argument | Oral argument |
Case history | |
Prior | United States v. Denno, 309 F. 2d 573 ( 2nd Cir. 1962) |
Holding | |
1. Under the New York procedure, the trial judge must make a preliminary determination of the voluntariness of a confession and exclude it if in no circumstances could the confession be deemed voluntary. 2. Petitioner is entitled to a state court hearing on the issue of the voluntariness of the confession by a body other than the one trying his guilt or innocence, but that does not necessarily entitle him to a new trial. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | White, joined by Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan, Goldberg |
Concur/dissent | Black, joined by Clark (Part I) |
Dissent | Clark |
Dissent | Harlan, joined by Clark, Stewart |
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | |
Stein v. New York (1953) [1] |
Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the process of determining whether a criminal defendant's confession was voluntary or coerced. The case was argued on December 9 and 10, 1963, and decided on June 22, 1964. In a majority opinion authored by Justice Byron White, the Court held that the rule requiring the jury in a criminal trial to determine the voluntariness of a confession, which was in place in New York at the time, was unconstitutional. This decision overruled the Supreme Court's prior decision in Stein v. New York, a 1953 case in which the Court had upheld the same New York rule against a constitutional challenge. [2] [3] [4]
Jackson v. Denno | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued December 9–10, 1963 Decided June 22, 1964 | |
Full case name | Nathan Jackson, Petitioner v. Wilfred Denno, Warden |
Citations | 378 U.S. 368 ( more) |
Argument | Oral argument |
Case history | |
Prior | United States v. Denno, 309 F. 2d 573 ( 2nd Cir. 1962) |
Holding | |
1. Under the New York procedure, the trial judge must make a preliminary determination of the voluntariness of a confession and exclude it if in no circumstances could the confession be deemed voluntary. 2. Petitioner is entitled to a state court hearing on the issue of the voluntariness of the confession by a body other than the one trying his guilt or innocence, but that does not necessarily entitle him to a new trial. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | White, joined by Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan, Goldberg |
Concur/dissent | Black, joined by Clark (Part I) |
Dissent | Clark |
Dissent | Harlan, joined by Clark, Stewart |
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | |
Stein v. New York (1953) [1] |
Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the process of determining whether a criminal defendant's confession was voluntary or coerced. The case was argued on December 9 and 10, 1963, and decided on June 22, 1964. In a majority opinion authored by Justice Byron White, the Court held that the rule requiring the jury in a criminal trial to determine the voluntariness of a confession, which was in place in New York at the time, was unconstitutional. This decision overruled the Supreme Court's prior decision in Stein v. New York, a 1953 case in which the Court had upheld the same New York rule against a constitutional challenge. [2] [3] [4]