I suggest to remove the protection of this page. This should be perfectly safe if the h1 heading is emulated with CSS instead of the current heading markup which results in the [edit] link next to the section. There shouldn't be problems with vandalization once this link has gone. This page is transcluded by a special page and therefore hard to discover; i.e. one can not click edit nor check the source of the special page to see what is transcluded. -- He!ko ( talk) 15:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Done – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 02:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
I suggest to remove the protection of this page. This should be perfectly safe if the h1 heading is emulated with CSS instead of the current heading markup which results in the [edit] link next to the section. There shouldn't be problems with vandalization once this link has gone. This page is transcluded by a special page and therefore hard to discover; i.e. one can not click edit nor check the source of the special page to see what is transcluded. -- He!ko ( talk) 15:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Done – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 02:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC)