I dispute the assertion that this fair-use image fails to meet Wikipedia's Criterion 8 for non-free content. Criterion 8 reads, Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." This image is important to readers' understanding for the following reasons:
Wikipedia's non-free content criteria page states that a main purpose of the criteria is "To facilitate the judicious use of non-free content to support the development of a high-quality encyclopedia." Although tagging and removal are important functions in the Wikipedia community, their inappropriate application is a threat to article quality. It also unnecessarily wastes a lot of people's time, especially when a valid rationale was already provided with the image in question, as it was here. -- Mianvar1 15:59 21 September 2023 (UTC) Mianvar1 ( talk) 16:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Another image, mentioned halfway through the sentence and located two sections away from the place of mention. — Ирука 13 16:08, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
In addition, this image does not fall under the first point of the WP:NFCC: it can easily be replaced with the words “the bas-relief of Hathor is so-and-so, truncated at the top along the chin line and at the bottom along the thigh.” And if the bas-relief is not destroyed, then it is cab be even recreated by 95-99%. — Ирука 13 19:21, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
I dispute the assertion that this fair-use image fails to meet Wikipedia's Criterion 8 for non-free content. Criterion 8 reads, Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." This image is important to readers' understanding for the following reasons:
Wikipedia's non-free content criteria page states that a main purpose of the criteria is "To facilitate the judicious use of non-free content to support the development of a high-quality encyclopedia." Although tagging and removal are important functions in the Wikipedia community, their inappropriate application is a threat to article quality. It also unnecessarily wastes a lot of people's time, especially when a valid rationale was already provided with the image in question, as it was here. -- Mianvar1 15:59 21 September 2023 (UTC) Mianvar1 ( talk) 16:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Another image, mentioned halfway through the sentence and located two sections away from the place of mention. — Ирука 13 16:08, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
In addition, this image does not fall under the first point of the WP:NFCC: it can easily be replaced with the words “the bas-relief of Hathor is so-and-so, truncated at the top along the chin line and at the bottom along the thigh.” And if the bas-relief is not destroyed, then it is cab be even recreated by 95-99%. — Ирука 13 19:21, 27 September 2023 (UTC)