This file is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
PD-text?
I'm quite unsure this logo can be claimed as unelligible for copyright, even according to US law. The company separately uses the X-looking symbol as a marque logo, and it may be beyond the treshold of originality by itself. It's certainly tricky to say it's just a "typeface" or a "simple geometric shape". Anyway, as I said I'm not sure, but I left my thoughts to be considered before this logo is moved to Commons. --
Urbanoc (
talk) 16:27, 27 April 2019 (UTC)reply
If it cannot be claimed as C-ineligible, then the licensing can be rolled back to the fair-use NFUR version of the file page. However, both the NIO marque logo and the Rivian marque logo exist on COMMONS and are more sophisticated symbols than this stylized X, without the alphabetic meaning, as PD-simple and PD-shape images, so this would seem to indicated that this stylized X is (C)-ineligible. --
70.51.201.106 (
talk) 09:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)reply
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
PD-text?
I'm quite unsure this logo can be claimed as unelligible for copyright, even according to US law. The company separately uses the X-looking symbol as a marque logo, and it may be beyond the treshold of originality by itself. It's certainly tricky to say it's just a "typeface" or a "simple geometric shape". Anyway, as I said I'm not sure, but I left my thoughts to be considered before this logo is moved to Commons. --
Urbanoc (
talk) 16:27, 27 April 2019 (UTC)reply
If it cannot be claimed as C-ineligible, then the licensing can be rolled back to the fair-use NFUR version of the file page. However, both the NIO marque logo and the Rivian marque logo exist on COMMONS and are more sophisticated symbols than this stylized X, without the alphabetic meaning, as PD-simple and PD-shape images, so this would seem to indicated that this stylized X is (C)-ineligible. --
70.51.201.106 (
talk) 09:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)reply