Intelligence is spelled wrong. -anonymous
SaaS appears twice. Why is that? 9ign 22:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
It would be cool if this talk page had links to the terms in this picture, which serves as a visual index of web 2.0 terms like:
Mathiastck 17:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
You can't claim the following concepts to have appeared as early as you did:
Indeed, some folks experimented very early with all those ideas, but it never went beyond their small communities. Granted, intelligence has been put in common since the early days of humanity, but in the web 2.0 context, this is about taking advantage of every bit of decision from (maybe anonymous) web users, in order to improve the service they are using; you can't put that prior WWW invention!
Besides, things like MCF (a very obscure ancestor of RDF) has never been associated with the web 2.0 buzz.
Also, the acronym SaaS, which certainly is now part of the Web 2.0 phenomenon (eventhough not really part of the associated buzz), is a relatively new kid on the block: I would have put it on 2005, not before.
Other components are okay, but if you talk about buzz, I'm surprised Google isn't there at all! -- XC 08:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC).
Intelligence is spelled wrong. -anonymous
SaaS appears twice. Why is that? 9ign 22:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
It would be cool if this talk page had links to the terms in this picture, which serves as a visual index of web 2.0 terms like:
Mathiastck 17:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
You can't claim the following concepts to have appeared as early as you did:
Indeed, some folks experimented very early with all those ideas, but it never went beyond their small communities. Granted, intelligence has been put in common since the early days of humanity, but in the web 2.0 context, this is about taking advantage of every bit of decision from (maybe anonymous) web users, in order to improve the service they are using; you can't put that prior WWW invention!
Besides, things like MCF (a very obscure ancestor of RDF) has never been associated with the web 2.0 buzz.
Also, the acronym SaaS, which certainly is now part of the Web 2.0 phenomenon (eventhough not really part of the associated buzz), is a relatively new kid on the block: I would have put it on 2005, not before.
Other components are okay, but if you talk about buzz, I'm surprised Google isn't there at all! -- XC 08:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC).