-
current status
-
03 Oct 2009
-
29 Sep 2009
-
07 Jul 2009
-
21 Jan 2009
There is no Åland on this map. -- Dima1 ( talk) 20:12, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
ireland should be changed to red to show it has been rejected and will not be ratified.
I did this on my computer but I'm not an autoconfirmed user so I cant upload it - Thealamo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thealamo ( talk • contribs) 18:37, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
I agree, and Poland should be changed to green as its parliament already ratified the Treaty. It doesn't matter whether President Kaczynski did not sign the law yet. In most countries, any law must be signed by a head of state in order to enter in force. Then either you turn also Germany, Estonia, Greece and Finland into blue (as of june 14th) or Poland must be green as the others. Finedelledanze ( talk) 11:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
If it's not law, it shouldn't be green —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.217.59.87 ( talk) 23:26, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Change colour of Cyprus. It has ratified Treaty today. -- Dima1 ( talk) 18:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Could anyone, please, change the colour of Poland on this map to cyan (RGB(0,255,255))? The president hasn't signed the treaty and it CANNOT be deposited in Rome. What he has done really is given himself the right to do so, nothing is obligatory however. Since we have cyan on the map it's been the right colour for Poland. It's also been explained on the Treaty of Lisbon wikipedia page.I've already tried to upload the corrected image, but the wiki doesn't trust me enough (update: I can't do this - image handling on Wiki is a horror :/// -- Pawel-kermit ( talk) 11:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Somebody please fix Estonia, it deposited already, also Poland must be painted in one colour with Germany and counted together (both presidents not signed the treaty) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.201.142 ( talk) 05:11, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Somebody should change the colour of Germany to yellow because the president has signed the treaty. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.192.36.27 ( talk) 21:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Excuse me, but Germany's president hasn't signed yet. -- Schokotrunk ( talk) 16:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
This is minor but as the lakes are part of Sweden, shouldn't their colour be the same as Sweden as a whole? Therequiembellishere ( talk) 17:20, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Poland should be stay blue. President Kaczyński not signed treaty. I'm a Pole and I watched that issue very carefully. On April 8, 2008 Lech Kaczyński signed only act over process of ratification, but not same treaty. Later Kaczyński announced he will sign treaty if will be ratified in Ireland. Ron 1987 ( User talk:Ron 1987 12:30, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
I think that the Lisbon treaty sucks and therefore, I notice that the colors are POV. -- 130.243.148.247 ( talk) 17:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Taking POV to the extreme, are we?? WOW!! IT USES RED AND GREEN... yes... they could be negative and positive... or they could be "has happened" and "hasn't happened"... of course... yes it's the second one !!!! 89.243.23.108 ( talk) 22:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC) (ATMarsden - not signed in - computer issues
Even if Westerwelle may like to see it all yellow.
One of the colours is described as "Ratified but no deposition of documents yet (i.e., signed by president)". This is confusing, since the treaty hasn't been signed by any presidents on behalf of Sweden, the Netherlands, Spain, the UK and some other countries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.247.11.156 ( talk) 13:32, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
This map is becoming slightly pointless now that it's all green! May I suggest a change to a more descriptive map, perhaps along the lines of:
AndrewRT( Talk) 15:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
The treaty had to be ratified by each member state before it came into effect. The process was not instantaneous, and took nearly two years from beginning to end. The ratification process is depicted below:
If green means "signed by head of state", then Sweden has the wrong colour. Sweden has fully ratified the treaty, but the ratification process has not involved the Swedish head of state in any way.
Maybe different colours could be used depending on when the treaty was ratified? E.g. "ratified during first half of 2008", "second half of 2008", "first half of 2009" and "second half of 2009". Maybe also "first half of 2010" if Klaus is slow. ( 212.247.11.156 ( talk) 15:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC))
See [1]. ( 212.247.11.156 ( talk) 21:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC))
There is no Åland on this map. -- Dima1 ( talk) 20:12, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
ireland should be changed to red to show it has been rejected and will not be ratified.
I did this on my computer but I'm not an autoconfirmed user so I cant upload it - Thealamo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thealamo ( talk • contribs) 18:37, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
I agree, and Poland should be changed to green as its parliament already ratified the Treaty. It doesn't matter whether President Kaczynski did not sign the law yet. In most countries, any law must be signed by a head of state in order to enter in force. Then either you turn also Germany, Estonia, Greece and Finland into blue (as of june 14th) or Poland must be green as the others. Finedelledanze ( talk) 11:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
If it's not law, it shouldn't be green —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.217.59.87 ( talk) 23:26, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Change colour of Cyprus. It has ratified Treaty today. -- Dima1 ( talk) 18:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Could anyone, please, change the colour of Poland on this map to cyan (RGB(0,255,255))? The president hasn't signed the treaty and it CANNOT be deposited in Rome. What he has done really is given himself the right to do so, nothing is obligatory however. Since we have cyan on the map it's been the right colour for Poland. It's also been explained on the Treaty of Lisbon wikipedia page.I've already tried to upload the corrected image, but the wiki doesn't trust me enough (update: I can't do this - image handling on Wiki is a horror :/// -- Pawel-kermit ( talk) 11:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Somebody please fix Estonia, it deposited already, also Poland must be painted in one colour with Germany and counted together (both presidents not signed the treaty) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.201.142 ( talk) 05:11, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Somebody should change the colour of Germany to yellow because the president has signed the treaty. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.192.36.27 ( talk) 21:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Excuse me, but Germany's president hasn't signed yet. -- Schokotrunk ( talk) 16:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
This is minor but as the lakes are part of Sweden, shouldn't their colour be the same as Sweden as a whole? Therequiembellishere ( talk) 17:20, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Poland should be stay blue. President Kaczyński not signed treaty. I'm a Pole and I watched that issue very carefully. On April 8, 2008 Lech Kaczyński signed only act over process of ratification, but not same treaty. Later Kaczyński announced he will sign treaty if will be ratified in Ireland. Ron 1987 ( User talk:Ron 1987 12:30, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
I think that the Lisbon treaty sucks and therefore, I notice that the colors are POV. -- 130.243.148.247 ( talk) 17:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Taking POV to the extreme, are we?? WOW!! IT USES RED AND GREEN... yes... they could be negative and positive... or they could be "has happened" and "hasn't happened"... of course... yes it's the second one !!!! 89.243.23.108 ( talk) 22:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC) (ATMarsden - not signed in - computer issues
Even if Westerwelle may like to see it all yellow.
One of the colours is described as "Ratified but no deposition of documents yet (i.e., signed by president)". This is confusing, since the treaty hasn't been signed by any presidents on behalf of Sweden, the Netherlands, Spain, the UK and some other countries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.247.11.156 ( talk) 13:32, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
This map is becoming slightly pointless now that it's all green! May I suggest a change to a more descriptive map, perhaps along the lines of:
AndrewRT( Talk) 15:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
The treaty had to be ratified by each member state before it came into effect. The process was not instantaneous, and took nearly two years from beginning to end. The ratification process is depicted below:
If green means "signed by head of state", then Sweden has the wrong colour. Sweden has fully ratified the treaty, but the ratification process has not involved the Swedish head of state in any way.
Maybe different colours could be used depending on when the treaty was ratified? E.g. "ratified during first half of 2008", "second half of 2008", "first half of 2009" and "second half of 2009". Maybe also "first half of 2010" if Klaus is slow. ( 212.247.11.156 ( talk) 15:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC))
See [1]. ( 212.247.11.156 ( talk) 21:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC))