Big omissions:
(the preceding unsigned comment was added at 07:47, 18 December 2008 by an anonymous user)
Great to see all the fixes people have made. It does seem to me, however, that perhaps there should be more porous borders between Poland, Belarus, and the Ukraine? In particular aren't there still pockets of Polish speakers in northwest Belarus and the Ukraine, particularly around L'viv/Lvov? Also, I wonder if Russian is really so equally distributed throughout Belarus, is it not concentrated more in the east? Brianski ( talk) 03:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Slavic Silesian has been recognized as a language by the academic community. It needs to be added to Upper Silesia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.212.68.23 ( talk) 06:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
German is also spoken in Upper Silesia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.80.115.113 ( talk) 03:21, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
What's the last time anyone has heard of Czechia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.127.153.31 ( talk) 21:50, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
I am not affiliated with Kosovo in any way, shape or form, but this png should have Kosovo as a country, at least with dispute borders. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.53.7.110 ( talk) 15:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Can you tell what is wrong with this map ?
Vast areas of Russia or Central to North Europe with many different official and minority languages are covered at best with checked colourations with general sense of language divergence, while small (really small) territory of Bosnia-H. and Montenegro is differentiated pixel by pixel !? Is that really necessary, are we really such a tribal maniacs ?
Not to mention that is completely incorrect ! -- Santasa99 ( talk) 08:39, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
I would like to add a suggestion - these two small territories of B-H and MN (with Croatia and Kosovo) should be coloured with checked patterns, since we know that all three languages are official and more-less evenly spread through out of state territory, at least not in a manner depicted on current map. -- Santasa99 ( talk) 08:56, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
On this Wikipedia hard to offend some people and their national languages, ignoring the facts and international documents. The fact that the Serbian and Croatian two different standard languages, here it does not matter how big the difference is, it deals with linguistics.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.227.18.219 ( talk) 16:06, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
-- 95.168.98.98 ( talk) 16:58, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Dear colleagues, I think that I have not well understood. The structure is not controversial, I and my colleagues think that your map is not correct. If these national languages into a single language group, though the map has to be labeled usage areas Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian and Montenegrin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.0.105.164 ( talk) 07:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Your map is nonsense, this opinion has the most people, you need to know.
By expert Professor Wayles Browne of Cornell University Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian and Montenegrin languages area
--Wayles Browne
This map has no sense - contains errors, lacks of many border transitional areas etc. Good candidate to nomination for deletation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.150.224.186 ( talk) 15:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Big omissions:
(the preceding unsigned comment was added at 07:47, 18 December 2008 by an anonymous user)
Great to see all the fixes people have made. It does seem to me, however, that perhaps there should be more porous borders between Poland, Belarus, and the Ukraine? In particular aren't there still pockets of Polish speakers in northwest Belarus and the Ukraine, particularly around L'viv/Lvov? Also, I wonder if Russian is really so equally distributed throughout Belarus, is it not concentrated more in the east? Brianski ( talk) 03:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Slavic Silesian has been recognized as a language by the academic community. It needs to be added to Upper Silesia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.212.68.23 ( talk) 06:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
German is also spoken in Upper Silesia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.80.115.113 ( talk) 03:21, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
What's the last time anyone has heard of Czechia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.127.153.31 ( talk) 21:50, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
I am not affiliated with Kosovo in any way, shape or form, but this png should have Kosovo as a country, at least with dispute borders. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.53.7.110 ( talk) 15:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Can you tell what is wrong with this map ?
Vast areas of Russia or Central to North Europe with many different official and minority languages are covered at best with checked colourations with general sense of language divergence, while small (really small) territory of Bosnia-H. and Montenegro is differentiated pixel by pixel !? Is that really necessary, are we really such a tribal maniacs ?
Not to mention that is completely incorrect ! -- Santasa99 ( talk) 08:39, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
I would like to add a suggestion - these two small territories of B-H and MN (with Croatia and Kosovo) should be coloured with checked patterns, since we know that all three languages are official and more-less evenly spread through out of state territory, at least not in a manner depicted on current map. -- Santasa99 ( talk) 08:56, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
On this Wikipedia hard to offend some people and their national languages, ignoring the facts and international documents. The fact that the Serbian and Croatian two different standard languages, here it does not matter how big the difference is, it deals with linguistics.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.227.18.219 ( talk) 16:06, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
-- 95.168.98.98 ( talk) 16:58, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Dear colleagues, I think that I have not well understood. The structure is not controversial, I and my colleagues think that your map is not correct. If these national languages into a single language group, though the map has to be labeled usage areas Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian and Montenegrin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.0.105.164 ( talk) 07:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Your map is nonsense, this opinion has the most people, you need to know.
By expert Professor Wayles Browne of Cornell University Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian and Montenegrin languages area
--Wayles Browne
This map has no sense - contains errors, lacks of many border transitional areas etc. Good candidate to nomination for deletation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.150.224.186 ( talk) 15:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)