Would it be a good idea or not to move 'Matter' to be a header for the left section, replacing it in the graph with 'Fermions', and do the same with 'Force carriers' and 'Bosons'? -- 80.192.11.119 ( talk) 04:36, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Um, shouldn't that not be there. Or did I misread the graph? Was it supposed to be based on source material? Because there are no source gravitons because they don't exist. Gravity is the relative approximate inversion of what is really going on. Mass only 'appears' to affect 'gravity' because each and every particle brings with it an entire universe of suction. However, the suction is not the root cause. The root cause is falling into the particle from all directions. It is the strong interaction & it is not gravity, gravity is just a current. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.218.85.222 ( talk) 17:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Would it be a good idea or not to move 'Matter' to be a header for the left section, replacing it in the graph with 'Fermions', and do the same with 'Force carriers' and 'Bosons'? -- 80.192.11.119 ( talk) 04:36, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Um, shouldn't that not be there. Or did I misread the graph? Was it supposed to be based on source material? Because there are no source gravitons because they don't exist. Gravity is the relative approximate inversion of what is really going on. Mass only 'appears' to affect 'gravity' because each and every particle brings with it an entire universe of suction. However, the suction is not the root cause. The root cause is falling into the particle from all directions. It is the strong interaction & it is not gravity, gravity is just a current. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.218.85.222 ( talk) 17:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)